click here to jump to start of article
Join Our Newsletter

Get latest articles and videos with Jewish inspiration and insights​




The Red Tent

The Red Tent

A popular novel characterizes the founders of the Jewish people as full of intrigue, lust and deceit. Should that bother us?

by

No means No.

Unless you're writing historical fiction.

The Torah (Genesis 34) tells us that Dina, Jacob's only daughter, is forcibly taken and raped by a powerful prince. Her brothers, unbeknown to their father, free her in a surgically planned guerilla strike.

In the surprising best-selling book, "The Red Tent" by Anita Diamant, it appears that "no" may very well mean, "yes." Diamant retells the story as the blending of two cultures and the desire of a woman to find love at any cost. Dina was not raped, says the author of "The Red Tent." Rather, she eloped and intermarried, throwing caution to the wind, allowing herself to be swept off her feet, guided by her heart and her love.



Dina seems to check her brain at the door, looking for love in all the wrong places.

While this depiction may be heartwarming and romantic, it reduces Dina to a character in a Harlequin romance novel, portraying her as little more than a mindless, love-starved girl.

Diamant gives our matriarchs the flawed portrayal of someone living in the 21st century, and makes a number of significant errors:

  • Shimon and Levi are presumed to be bloodthirsty sons of a devious, barbarous father, Jacob, willing to destroy the true love of his daughter for his old-fashioned beliefs.
  • Dina is willing to throw away her belief in monotheism and her role as a part of the founding family of Judaism
  • Rebecca, Isaac's wife, is depicted as a witch
  • Isaac seems like a bumbling old fool
  • Joseph is an illiterate
  • The matriarchs are idol worshippers, engaging in strange and at times barbaric rituals which bear no resemblance to Jewish law.

To ascribe these attributes and failings to our ancestors shows not only a lack of knowledge in Jewish history, but also an ignorance of sociology. We do not believe that our ancestors (or any human being) to be perfect. They, as we, had flaws and made mistakes. However, the issues we have today certainly were not theirs.

Intermarriage may be an issue for us. It is a serious and dangerous problem that eats away at the core of our people. But it was not an issue for Dina, a prophetess who was prepared to die for her beliefs.

Can someone who actually spoke to God doubt His existence?

The Torah details how Jacob chastised his sons for killing the men of Shechem. Even on his deathbed, he let them know how this act went against his way of life and how it embarrassed the entire family.

Every Bar/Bat Mitzvah child knows that our forbearers possessed faith beyond our comprehension. What about the 10 great tests of Abraham, where he was willing to give up everything for the sake of Jewish ideals?

To give our forefathers the same doubts that many of us have concerning the existence of God and what He wants is simply too far-fetched. We struggle with these issues. We can study, learn, question and investigate the teachings of Judaism to find the answers. We look at the Holocaust and question, and we look at the world today and question. We try to get answers. But to ascribe those same doubts to our ancestors who spoke to God, who saw the burning bush, who experienced the Exodus and countless other miracles is deeply mistaken. These are our issues, not theirs.

FALLIBLE GIANTS

Anita Diamant is clear from the beginning that her work is fiction. So if she never claims the story to be true, what's the big deal about "The Red Tent"?

We cannot accept that our forefathers, even in fiction, could be petty, could be murderers, could be willing to throw away the relationship they fought so hard for with the Almighty.

Our tradition teaches that our forbearers were judged with extreme precision, because they were on such a high level.

Even the "red tent" in the story, a place to which women were cast off during their menstruation cycle and men never ventured near, has no basis in Jewish belief or history. It says more for today's questions about equality of the sexes, than in biblical times, since the red tent never existed. Perhaps the author invented it to figuratively create a "women's club." But nevertheless, she created it.

If Diamant had written about 14th century Ireland or 20th century Canada, this would not present a problem. Her story is compelling and grabs the reader from the first page. But the novel is not about those times. It is about the people who fought and struggled to bring monotheism and eventually Judaism into the world and to make it a better place.

Only sheer audacity would enable an author to rewrite the history of a nation's seminal figures, tarnishing the name of Judaism's noble ancestors. They were fallible, but they were giants. Even historical fiction must be based on history. And in this, she fails.

Published: June 9, 2001


Give Tzedakah! Help Aish.com create inspiring
articles, videos and blogs featuring timeless Jewish wisdom.

Visitor Comments: 104

(97) SusanE, December 14, 2014 7:50 PM

The Red Tent

I read this book several years ago in Book Club. We discussed it only to the point that the Red Tent wasn't a part of Jewish ritual or culture. I do know about separateness, abstinence and mikvah in those times and today for women. I thought at the time that it was not too interesting because I've read the story in Torah. HOWEVER, as the author did in this book, every false tale, every lie, every bit of fiction is made believable by a kernel of truth inserted into the fiction.

(96) Watching History, November 30, 2014 1:17 AM

Historical Errors in the Red Tent

I don't know if anyone is still reading this or will come across the post so, anyways, I will just leave this here for the curious.

To those who contend it is "just" a work of fiction, I respond that any work, fiction or not, intends to shape a consciousness concerning something. If you take on historical fiction, then you have committed yourself to some modicum of truth judgment. For example, one could and has written a novel which portrays Abraham Lincoln as a vampire hunter. Now, this is egregious fantasy, but should - not can - a person write a fictitious novel portraying Stalin as hero? One can do this, but one needs to ask whether he or she should. Historical fiction has a responsibility, just as Dan Brown violated his responsibility in the "Da Vinci Code."

Regarding the accuracy of the novel, there's a couple of problems aside from characterizations which obviously have an agenda at reinterpreting Biblical patriarchs. Since the endogamous matriarchs, daughters of Laban, hailed from Haran, I find it unlikely they would not be Yahwistic. Furthermore, the teraphim were most likely not statuettes of gods but rather than mummified heads of the ancestors used in divinatory practice (cf. Targum Pseudo-Jonathan, the accounts of teraphim in Micah and Samuel and the archaeology researches of Kathleen Kenyon). No doubt, ancestral veneration was outlawed in some forms (but encouraged in others - cf. Herbert Brichto) under Mosaic Law; however, this was by no means worship of foreign gods. Furthermore, recent archaeology (cf. Jeffrey Tigay) has suggested that much of the so-called goddess worship evidenced in the many statuettes of ancient Canaan ought to be classified as sympathetic magic without any relation to religious worship at all.

Anonymous, December 9, 2014 4:24 AM

Relax

It's a storybook. Calm down. It's a beautiful story of love and forgiveness. If people think it's all true, let them. . .
Relaaaax.

Anonymous, December 16, 2014 6:02 AM

True or not great story

People all great works of art are imbelished so that we read and enjoy. So enjoy. Don't get too deep into it.

(95) Faith, August 27, 2013 8:22 PM

Comments on the book Zipporah by Marek Halter should also be considered. Believe me, if you felt ticked off by the Red Tent, this one will tick you off by a mile! The things said about Moshe and Zipporah are mind boggling, to say the least.

See All Comments

Submit Your Comment:

  • Display my name?

  • Your email address is kept private. Our editor needs it in case we have a question about your comment.


  • * required field 2000
Submit Comment
stub