click here to jump to start of article
Join Our Newsletter

Join 400,000 Aish subscribers
Get Email Updates




The Jewish Ethicist: Stealing Customers_

The Jewish Ethicist: Stealing Customers_

What is considered fair competition for customers?

by

Q. In our small community there is an established business that has served residents for years. Recently, a competing business opened and is turning to customers to persuade them to use their services instead. Is this ethical?

A. Jewish law has an extensive tradition regarding fair competition for customers. Let's examine some of the main conclusions of our tradition:

1. Other things being equal, we should strive to avoid competition that would significantly harm someone's livelihood. Usually a person devotes prolonged and careful thought before entering a line of business which shows promise of profits; why not devote an extra few hours of thought to see if you can find one which won't take away someone's current means of support?

If everyone thought this way, we would have more creative ideas for new goods and services, and less economic dislocation. But more important than the economic impact is the human element: displaying consideration for our neighbors.

Realistically, it is not always possible to make a living without treading on someone's toes. Therefore, Jewish law does not forbid competing with an existing business even if the competitor may make damaging inroads into the established firm's clientele. However, there are some principles of fair competition.

2. Jewish law sanctions constructive – not destructive – competition. Therefore, it is unethical to employ means that are intended to harm the competitor, rather than attract legitimate business. This includes predatory pricing or acting to block customers' access to the competing firm.

3. It is improper to use the competitor's efforts to his detriment. For example, it is forbidden to go into the competitor's store to solicit customers! A modern variant would be using the competitor's own customer list as a basis for solicitation.

Another example given in Jewish law is using someone's creative efforts to his detriment, for example by stealing an inventive process and the like. In our time, these issues are regulated by intellectual property law, including patents, trademarks and copyrights. These should be respected.

4. Competition should be for new business. It is usually unethical to try and convince customers to cancel their existing agreements. If customers turn to you and decide on their own initiative that they want to terminate their current agreements (in a permissible way) that's not your problem, but it's not nice to encourage people to break their agreements.

It is also appropriate to consider the scope of the impact. If a new entrant will be able to make a respectable living and the existing firm will continue to exist, there is relatively little problem. But common sense and ethical sensibilities concur that it is best not to compete if the end result will be ruinous competition leading to razor-thin profits for both the new and the old firm.

Let's apply these insights to your question. First of all, let us hope that the new entrant considered other possibilities before he decided to start trying to lure customers who are currently happy with the existing firm. The next thing to point out is that the inducements being offered to customers should involve substantive and sustainable benefits compared to the current service. Also, it would be completely unethical to get the names of potential customers from the confidential lists of the current supplier. Finally, in direct solicitation the new firm should offer to take care of the customers' new business, not encourage them to cancel their agreement with the current firm.

Jewish law recognizes that competition for customers is a valuable incentive for firms to provide better service at lower prices. But like any beneficial phenomenon, the maximum benefit from competition is when it is carried out within rational and ethical constraints.

SOURCE: Pitchei Choshen Geneiva chapter 9, based mainly on Shulchan Arukh Choshen Mishpat 156 and 386.

Send your queries about ethics in the workplace to jewishethicist@aish.com

The Jewish Ethicist presents some general principles of Jewish law. For specific questions and direct application, please consult a qualified Rabbi.

Published: September 13, 2003


Give Tzedakah! Help Aish.com create inspiring
articles, videos and blogs featuring timeless Jewish wisdom.

Visitor Comments: 2

(2) Leah Mark, September 16, 2003 12:00 AM

What you say is nice in theory. We are following all the ethical precepts you mention. We have done so intrinsically always. Now that we supply only to the kosher market in a small community, we see the precepts you mention broken almost everyday by so called kosher suppliers buyers competitors, you name it. I feel the only livelihood is not selling or dealing with Jews. Call me cynical but it has been our experience. Keep writing your columns . Maybe someone will listen . Leah Mark

(1) al puglisi, September 15, 2003 12:00 AM

thank you

As an insurance professional I am sometimes in a situation where a client I may have contacted a prospect who already has an agent. Now they may be unhappy with their current agent and want to change. I try to avoid these situations but as much of business comes from cold calling, it is a virtual impossibility. Usually if someone I have contacted informs me that they have an agent, I cut the contact short there for the very reasons you state. Is this the ethical thing to do? Or should I pursue the situation? Sometimes I wonder. Thanks for giving me something to think about.
If you can answer the questions I raise here, concerning my own situation, I would appreciate it.

Submit Your Comment:

  • Display my name?

  • Your email address is kept private. Our editor needs it in case we have a question about your comment.


  • * required field 2000
Submit Comment
stub
Sign up today!