click here to jump to start of article
  • Torah Reading: Naso
Join Our Newsletter

Get latest articles and videos with Jewish inspiration and insights​

The Jewish Ethicist: Distant Danger

The Jewish Ethicist: Distant Danger

Is it ethical to sell cosmetics that pose a minor health hazard?


Q. Some of the cosmetics I sell contain ingredients that are now suspected of increasing the risk of disease. Can I continue to sell these products?

A. It is certainly unethical to sell clearly dangerous merchandise to an unsuspecting customer. But nowadays the situation is not always so simple. Scientists are constantly discovering new and increasing remote health hazards in common products, while consumers are displaying increased sensitivity to these distant dangers.

Products that constitute a clear and present danger to health may not be sold even to a willing customer. The Torah commands us, "Be very careful of your soul" (Deut. 4:15), and our Sages explain that this obliges us to take care of our health (Talmud, Berachot 32b). Another verse states that we should not place a stumbling block before the blind (Lev. 19:14), which means causing another person to falter in his personal obligations.

So peddling a clearly dangerous product, like selling glue for sniffing, is completely forbidden since it helps the customer to do something totally improper.

However, the health hazards that are typically discovered in common products are seldom of this nature, especially in advanced countries where personal care products are subject to regulation. It is very unusual for risks to be so great that use would be actually prohibited to an informed customer.

In this case the ethical dilemma is not the danger per se, but rather the chance that you may be misleading the customer. Can you let "the buyer beware," or do you have to take some responsibility for product safety that meets customer expectations?

Jewish law clearly states that merchants are responsible to provide products that meet reasonable customer expectations. This responsibility is not because of any particular customer need but rather because a genuinely ethical exchange is one in which there is complete understanding and agreement between the sides.

As an example, the Talmud teaches that it is forbidden for a kosher butcher to sell non-kosher meat to an unsuspecting non-Jew (Talmud, Chullin 94b). Even though non-Jews have no need for kosher meat, and even if the price is fair, the seller may not disappoint the customer's reasonable expectations -- and it is certainly reasonable to assume that meat sold by a kosher butcher should be kosher meat.

So your dilemma boils down to the following question: Do your customers have a reasonable expectation that the products you sell are free of known hazards? This will depend on many factors, but the most important is whether you or the manufacturer have worked to develop an image of purity and safety. The average customer who buys an unknown product off the shelf does not expect that it exceed regulatory requirements. If this anonymous transaction describes your relationship with your customers, then you may sell the problematic merchandise.

But if you or the manufacturer have sought a reputation for healthy and pure products, then you have simultaneously fostered expectations on the part of your clientele that your products go beyond the letter of the law and meet a higher standard.

You should examine your advertising and marketing materials and your sales pitch to determine if you are communicating a message of healthfulness, purity and responsibility over and above what the law requires. If you have cultivated these expectations in your customers, then you shouldn't sell the problematic products to your unsuspecting clientele. You should either delicately inform them of the potential problems or else pass the products on to a more anonymous selling network such as a drugstore.

Send your queries about ethics in the workplace to

The Jewish Ethicist presents some general principles of Jewish law. For specific questions and direct application, please consult a qualified Rabbi.

November 15, 2003

Give Tzedakah! Help create inspiring
articles, videos and blogs featuring timeless Jewish wisdom.
The opinions expressed in the comment section are the personal views of the commenters. Comments are moderated, so please keep it civil.

Visitor Comments: 3

(3) rivka, December 28, 2003 12:00 AM

There is a big difference . . .

. . . between something which is known to be harmful, and something which MAY cause harm. With all the "studies" that crop up (many not conducted using scientifically valid protocols) on just about every ingredient that can be named, many of which indicate that there might, perhaps, be a very small risk of future harm -- there are left very few ingredients that are KNOWN to be harmless.

Even water can kill you!

Small amounts of "ingredients that are now suspected of increasing the risk of disease" are almost UNAVOIDABLE. The problem arises when they are not merely "suspected" but there is a strong link shown to a significant risk.

This is hardly the same thing as a known defect in a property; this is a SUSPECTED -increase- in risk.

(2) Karl Rose, November 18, 2003 12:00 AM

I agree with Anonymous

I agree with her (Anonymous). Remember Enron and the managers who said nothing (condoned the egregious corporate behavior)kept mum and went along with the corporate crooks, to the detriment off the unsuspecting workers. Our ethics must be strong and for us not to waver about in our beliefs.

(1) Anonymous, November 17, 2003 12:00 AM

NO, you may not sell these products

The issue here is not advertising, it is ethics. It is not ethical to sell products which you believe may do harm, regardless of how you advertise or where you sell them. The test is: Do your customers have a reasonable expectation that the products you sell are free of known hazards? The question is, known by whom? If YOU know the product is hazardous, it is known by you-so you cannot sell it in any manner unless you fully disclose the hazard to a buyer capable of understanding the danger. This excludes selling to a buyer whom you know will resell the product without disclosure. In real estate sales, you must disclose any known defect in the property-same idea.

Submit Your Comment:

  • Display my name?

  • Your email address is kept private. Our editor needs it in case we have a question about your comment.

  • * required field 2000
Submit Comment