Defect Disclosure
click here to jump to start of article
Join Our Newsletter

Get latest articles and videos with Jewish inspiration and insights​




Defect Disclosure

Defect Disclosure

When do I have to let customers know about defects?

by

Q. If I tell a customer the whole story when he first comes to look at a property, he may lose interest before he becomes aware of its advantages. How far can I put off disclosing some details?

A. One thing is certain: any flaws in a purchase item must be made known to the customer before closing the agreement. The Talmud teaches explicitly that any attribute of the item that is material to the seller must be made known to him, and the seller needs to take the initiative to disclose this information. Maimonides writes: "It is forbidden to cheat people in commerce or mislead them… If he knows of any defect in the sale item, he must disclose it to the buyer." (1) We see that Jewish law categorically rejects the norm of caveat emptor, "let the buyer beware," which places all responsibility for a satisfactory purchase on the buyer. The seller has to volunteer information that he knows is material for the buyer.

But our law also avoids the opposite extreme of placing the entire burden on the seller. The seller is not expected to be a fiduciary or agent for the buyer; it is perfectly legitimate for him to promote his own interest by trying to persuade the buyer to buy. While he may not mislead the customer into thinking that the product has qualities that it really lacks, the seller does have the right to present the genuine characteristics of the merchandise in a flattering way, which maximizes the customer's interest.

One way the merchant can do this is by giving the merchandise an attractive appearance. The Mishna states that it is forbidden to paint old utensils so that the buyer is misled into thinking that they are new, but by the same token we learn that painting them to make them more attractive, without passing them off as new, is permissible. (2) So painting a house before putting it up for sale is okay, as long as the paint is not used to disguise defects such as decay.

Another legitimate selling tactic is to give the product an attractive name. The Talmud tells of an unusual case where the kosher butchers in a particular city had only non-kosher meat to sell. Since customers would normally assume the meat is kosher, the defect must be revealed to all customers, even non-Jewish ones, to avoid misleading them. However, the butchers are not required to announce in a coarse way that the meat is "treif," meaning "carrion." Rather, they may use a more delicate expression, stating that this is "meat for the soldiers." (3) Any reasonable buyer will get the hint. When dealers sell "pre-owned cars" or computer sellers market "out of the box" items, they are taking advantage of this leniency. These expressions are more delicate than "used," but they definitely get the message across.

Finally, the seller is allowed to use some judgment in deciding when to reveal defects. The Talmud tells of a fellow who found it difficult to find a match because some people disdained his family background. The leading sage, Rav, advised him to go to another city where his background would not be known. As a consequence, people would not prejudge him as a marriage prospect based on this one characteristic. In other words, it would be permissible for him to put off disclosure until the "buyer" would have chance to evaluate his positive qualities.(4)

So if you are selling a beautiful property but some of the plumbing needs replacement, you don't have to disclose this fact immediately. You can allow the customer to be impressed by the positive aspects of the home first, and disclose the flaws afterwards when the customer will be able to consider them in the total context of the property's characteristics.

However, we have to be careful not to cross the line into bargaining in bad faith. If you wait until the closing to disclose the property's flaws, then you are taking advantage of the fact that the customer has already invested time and money in pursuing this particular home; to some extent you have him over a barrel. This is definitely a misleading and exploitative sales tactic. Rather, as soon as you feel that the customer has obtained a fair impression of the property's advantages, you should advise him of any material disadvantages.

SOURCES:
(1) Maimonides Mishneh Torah Laws of Sale 18:1. (2) Mishna end of fourth chapter of Bava Metzia. (3) Babylonian Talmud Chullin 94b (4) Babylonian Talmud Yevamot 45a.

Send your queries about ethics in the workplace to jewishethicist@aish.com

To sponsor a column of the Jewish Ethicist, please click here.

The Jewish Ethicist presents some general principles of Jewish law. For specific questions and direct application, please consult a qualified Rabbi.

The Jewish Ethicist is a joint project of Aish.com and the Business Ethics Center of Jerusalem. To find out more about business ethics and Jewish values for the workplace, visit the JCT Center for Business Ethics website at www.besr.org.

JCT Center For Business Ethics

Copyright © JCT Center for Business Ethics.

Published: January 10, 2004


Give Tzedakah! Help Aish.com create inspiring
articles, videos and blogs featuring timeless Jewish wisdom.

Visitor Comments: 2

(2) Anonymous, January 14, 2004 12:00 AM

I found your article on Defect DIsclosure so interesting and extremely helpful. I am trying to decide whether to sell my home that I have occupied for over 50 years and relocate at smaller quarters. Your article gave me such insight that I made a copy of it and will refer to it when I have made a final decision to move. At this point of my life, I am widowed and my children are married and are blessed with their own families. Your article gave me much food for thought.

Thank you.

(1) al puglisi, January 12, 2004 12:00 AM

right on

I feel that this answer to the question is right on. As an insurance salesman I must sometime deal with this question, for I may have a perfectly wonderful policy that perhaps does not contain some of the features of some other policies. Does this qualify as a defect and do I need to point it out? If the prospect were to ask about xyz feature, I would of course reveal that abc policy does not have such a feature, but do I need to bring it up if the prospect does not?
I enjoyed this answer because I have known too many people who have sold their car under the caveat emptor principle, something I have never done. I have seen the suffereing that such concealment has caused.
I am not Jewish, but I am thrilled and fascinated and study hard the ethics teachings that I read here and elsewhere. Many of them are so different than what we are used to in America...this issue being one.

Submit Your Comment:

  • Display my name?

  • Your email address is kept private. Our editor needs it in case we have a question about your comment.


  • * required field 2000
Submit Comment
stub
Sign up today!