The Jewish Ethicist: Fair Pay
click here to jump to start of article
Join Our Newsletter

Get latest articles and videos with Jewish inspiration and insights​




The Jewish Ethicist: Fair Pay

The Jewish Ethicist: Fair Pay

Can my employer underpay me?

by

Q. I'm a highly qualified professional, but my employer takes advantage of my strained situation to pay me way below my true worth. Is this ethical?

A. We find that the Torah does legislate charging a fair price: "And when you sell something to your fellow, or buy from the hand of your fellow, don't oppress each other" (Leviticus 25:14).This verse forbids selling an object far above the usual price, or buying one far below this price.

However, the essence of this law is not the problem of the fair price per se. "Just price" doctrine, which was a major topic of ancient jurisprudence, is given scant attention in Jewish law. Rather, the problem is one of misleading the customer. The baseline price is not determined by any intrinsic evaluation, but rather by the normal selling price. The idea is that a customer has a right to expect that a particular merchant is selling for a price similar to that of other comparable establishments. He had no intention of making a transaction at an unfair price, so the sale is void.

There is a hint of this theme in the word "to oppress"; the problem is a human one of deceit and exploitation, rather than a specifically economic one of obtaining an unfair price. For this reason this prohibition does not apply if the seller (or buyer) openly acknowledges that his price differs from what is usual in the market.

Furthermore, this law's main application is in sales of merchandise. It is still improper to actively deceive a worker (or employer), but an unusually high or low price for work does not annul the deal as it does with goods.(1) One common explanation of this limitation is that it is impossible to talk of a "standard" rate for labor, because each human being is unique. So even this limitation to the law bears a profound human message.

Even though we can not find any specific ethical lapse in paying someone a low salary if he agrees to it, the Talmud does hint at a potential problem with such behavior. The Talmud, in tractate Bava Metzia, discusses a case where there is a sudden change in the general wage rate. If the wage rate suddenly goes down, the employer may be tempted to discharge his workers and hire new ones at the current bargain price. If the current workers persuade the employer to keep them on, they should get the same high wage they were getting before, unless the employer stipulates otherwise.

Why do they deserve this wage? The Talmud tells us that they justify their demands by stating, "We intended to work harder."

Conversely, if wages suddenly rise, the workers may be tempted to look for a new job. If the employer persuades them to stay, they get the same low wage they got before. Why do they deserve this? The employer can say, "I intend to make it up to you in better working conditions." (2) In other words, barring an explicit agreement the assumption is that a change in wages should be accompanied by a change in motivation or working conditions.

The sages of the Talmud recognized a familiar lesson of management: motivation is proportional to compensation. When people are paid more than the going rate, they are naturally motivated to work harder; when they are paid less, their motivation naturally suffers unless they are provided better working conditions. So while an underpaid worker also is obligated to be diligent and honest, the employer should be wise and not push his luck. While Jewish tradition doesn't interfere with wage negotiations between employer and employee, it does recognize that it's just not reasonable to pay a qualified worker a sub-standard salary and expect him to work at the level of his fairly-compensated peers.

SOURCES: (1) Shulchan Arukh Choshen Mishpat 227:33 and commentaries. (2) Bava Metzia 77a.

Send your queries about ethics in the workplace to jewishethicist@aish.com

To sponsor a column of the Jewish Ethicist, please click here.

The Jewish Ethicist presents some general principles of Jewish law. For specific questions and direct application, please consult a qualified Rabbi.

The Jewish Ethicist is a joint project of Aish.com and the Business Ethics Center of Jerusalem. To find out more about business ethics and Jewish values for the workplace, visit the JCT Center for Business Ethics website at www.besr.org.

Published: October 23, 2004


Give Tzedakah! Help Aish.com create inspiring
articles, videos and blogs featuring timeless Jewish wisdom.

Visitor Comments: 2

(2) Motty Perel, October 26, 2004 12:00 AM

Solution to exploitation.

Labour is property of the worker.

The worker may invest his labour in his own business for a potential profit, or he may sell his labour to an employer and then the employer is collecting the potential profit on the worker's labour. Exploitation of the worker comes down to the circumstance that when the market value of the worker's labour is less than the selling price of this labour's outcome, the employer credits the difference (profit on labour) to his account. Were the employer to credit this difference to his worker's account, and credit to himself only the profit on means of production (expenses other than labour), then the employer would have a continuously motivated worker. I regret that such an arrangement is not activated yet.

I agreement with Beverly Kurtin, however, I say that your compaliner is wrong. However exploited (if his labour does produce profit to the employer -- and that may not be the case), he is paid the market value of his labour. Everyone who holds a job is paid the market value of his labour by the very definition of market value. His labour is not forced; he can leave his employer and could have refused to work for his present wage in the first place. Working for below market value of one's labour implies that there is another employer who is ready and willing to pay more. If so, why not switch to that other employer?

What? This employer resides in another city? in another country? You cannot move to the employer? Well then, in your city, what you get is exactly the market value of your labour.

(1) Beverly Kurtin, October 24, 2004 12:00 AM

The real question

The real question is why does the individual remain where he is? I'm a professional and have always refused to work for less than I am worth based on my productivity.

As a woman, I have had employers try to cheat me by paying me less than the going rate for men. Some employers still feel that men somehow need more money than women. When I explained that I dont get discounts on my rent, food, clothing, transportation... I get what the guys get...and then after my productivity figures are calculated, I get my raises.

I now refuse to work for anyone other than myself.

Submit Your Comment:

  • Display my name?

  • Your email address is kept private. Our editor needs it in case we have a question about your comment.


  • * required field 2000
Submit Comment
stub