click here to jump to start of article
  • Torah Reading: Naso
Join Our Newsletter

Get latest articles and videos with Jewish inspiration and insights​

The Jewish Ethicist: Clique Doesn't Click

The Jewish Ethicist: Clique Doesn't Click

How should we relate to exclusive social circles?


Q. The really snobby, "in" clique at my school views me as unsophisticated due to my family background. As a result, I'm sentenced to socializing with a bunch of nerds. Is it ethical for social groups to be so closed?

A. Your question describes a phenomenon I see very often. People are ultra-sensitive to the way in which they are unfairly pigeonholed in society, yet they remain unaware of the way in which they themselves tend to categorize others.

In your case, you feel that the "fashionable" students are not looking at your character, but only at superficial characteristics such as your family background. Yet you yourself are also prejudging other students, dismissing pupils who don't belong to the elite group as "a bunch of nerds".

The same phenomenon exists in dating. A young adult with outstanding personal qualities who didn't attend the most prestigious college or elite day-school may find it difficult to get dates with the "in" people who belong.. The paradoxical result is often for the single to complain that he or she is stuck dating the "second-rate" singles instead of the "elite" ones he or she seeks.

The most effective and most ethical response is to be determined not to make the same mistakes you perceive in others. Instead of dismissing the "second-tier" clique as a bunch of nerds, be determined to judge each one on his or her character. Instead of resenting being limited to "second-rate" singles, be determined to judge your own dates as you want them to judge you: by their conduct, not by their diplomas.

This paradox was the topic of Marty, a wonderful 1950's movie starring Ernest Borgnine as a single, not-so-attractive middle-aged butcher. At first Marty resents that his outward appearance and lack of charm condemn him to dates with "ugly" girls, but he learns that in fact these qualities free him to look past the superficial qualities valued by his friends and family and establish a deep connection with a young woman of great inner beauty, with whom he can find genuine happiness.

My experience is that the "Marty" phenomenon is genuine. In a status-crazed society, a clique can be as much a prison as a club. Sometimes only outsiders have the luxury of finding deeper happiness by choosing friends or dates on the basis of character and compatibility rather than on all kinds of superficial social conventions.

At the time of the exodus from Egypt, God punished all the Egyptians, "from the first-born of Pharaoh sitting on his throne to the first born of the bond-servant behind the grinding stone" (Exodus 11:5). This verse hints that Egyptian society was obsessed with class distinctions; it suggests a whole range of intermediate gradations familiar to everybody. Rashi's commentary adds that even the bond-servants were worthy of vengeance because they too lorded it over the Israelites. Rather than learning from their own lowly status that we should reject and overcome class distinctions, the Egyptian servants were willing to accept these distinctions because they too could take pride in their superiority over a yet-lower class.

Only the Israelites learned the true lesson of slavery. The Torah teaches us that from our own experience of slavery, we must learn the value of freedom and equality. The children of Israel went on to create a truly egalitarian society, in which every family acquired a comparable landed estate and in which no hereditary class distinctions were observed. I personally know of no Jewish community in history which recognized any kind of formal hereditary ruling or land-owning class.

Every person who feels the sting of exclusion and stereotyping is capable of internalizing this remarkable message.

The Jewish Ethicist presents some general principles of Jewish law. For specific questions and direct application, please consult a qualified Rabbi.

April 16, 2005

Give Tzedakah! Help create inspiring
articles, videos and blogs featuring timeless Jewish wisdom.
The opinions expressed in the comment section are the personal views of the commenters. Comments are moderated, so please keep it civil.

Visitor Comments: 2

(2) Eliyahu Rooff, April 26, 2005 12:00 AM

But did we learn?

Rabbi Meir says that only the Israelites learned the true lesson of slavery. While we may not now discriminate on a basis of property ownership or ruling status, we set other criteria that we use instead of judging the person as an individual. Easiest example would be in arranging marriages within the O community. Much attention is still paid to the ancestry of the prospective bride or groom, what the parents do for a living, where they came from, etc. -- things having nothing to do with the actual character or worth of the son or daughter. Had our ancestors used such qualifications, no one would have found a bride for Moshe Rabbenu (educated in a goyish household; ex-felon, based on his killing of the overseer; no yeshiva training), Avraham (father was an idol worshiper), Rabbi Akiva (no yeshiva background, came from a family of farmers) or other illustrious leaders of historic Judaism.
We still have classes in our Jewish community. They're just based on things other than what the Rabbi mentioned here.

(1) Yisroel Pensack, April 19, 2005 12:00 AM

Equality Depends on Land Rights

Rabbi Meir is right on target when he says that freedom and social equality depend upon equality of land rights. The American economist and social philosopher Henry George -- a great admirer of Moshe Rabbenu and a lover of Israel
-- explained how this condition can be achieved in modern society in his masterpiece "Progress and Poverty" and in his other works.

Submit Your Comment:

  • Display my name?

  • Your email address is kept private. Our editor needs it in case we have a question about your comment.

  • * required field 2000
Submit Comment