click here to jump to start of article
Join Our Newsletter

Join 400,000 Aish subscribers
Get Email Updates




Morality in the Workplace

Morality in the Workplace

How to walk the business tightrope.

by

As a criminal defense lawyer who often represents celebrities in high-profile cases, the media does not only cover my cases but also very often writes about me personally. As a result, the fact that I am an observant Jew often finds itself into many news stories, even though that information is never relevant to the case I am working on. Accordingly, I have to be very careful about what I say and how I say it, as despite my stature within the legal community, to many I am still the "Jew" lawyer. If I win the case, it is important to all Jews. Regardless of whether I win or lose, however, I must act with grace and respect as my public statements impact all Jews.

For example, when the late Johnnie Cochran and I successfully defended Puff Daddy, one of the world's best-known celebrity hip-hop stars, the stunning verdict, an acquittal on all counts, was announced in New York late on a Friday afternoon. This was a fabulous professional victory for me, which I knew would be trumpeted by the media throughout the world. With Shabbat rapidly approaching, I left the courthouse where hundreds of reporters waited to discuss the verdict. I was very conscious of the fact that every word I said would be quoted all over the world, but also well aware that it was already very late.

I looked straight into dozens of cameras and said, "This is an amazing victory, and I am, of course, very happy for Puffy and his family. I know that following the Super Bowl, the winning quarterback generally announces that he is now 'going to Disneyland.' Well, ladies and gentlemen, this winning quarterback is going to synagogue -- Shabbat is coming!"

My leaving a press conference because "Shabbat is coming" turned a personal professional victory into a genuine kiddush Hashem.

I then jumped into a waiting car and sped away. Since that episode, I have been told by hundreds of people that my winning the Puff Daddy case was an important shot in the arm for Jews everywhere, but my leaving a press conference because "Shabbat is coming" turned a personal professional victory into a genuine kiddush Hashem [sanctification of God's Name].

Perhaps my situation is unique since not many Orthodox Jews occupy high-profile jobs that are routinely covered by the media. Yet I recognize that what I do and how I do it are often a matter of public discussion and scrutiny, whether or not I like it. Accordingly, even minor encounters or seemingly inconsequential episodes in my professional life can take on extraordinary significance.

Thus, for example, some years ago I represented the principal defendant in a major trial, held in New York, that was receiving intense daily media coverage. One news article that dealt with trial scheduling issues included the observation that the trial would adjourn at two o'clock on Fridays because "lead counsel Ben Brafman, an observant Jew, had to be home before sundown." To the average reader and even to those involved in the case, that passing observation was not significant. To some Orthodox Jews, however, it was far more important than I could have possibly imagined, as for months following the trial, people I did not even know would stop me on the street to tell me how my "public" announcement about not working on Shabbat made it much easier for them to explain observance issues to their own employers. To be perfectly candid, it never occurred to me that my keeping Shabbat would help others resolve sensitive issues in their own professional lives.

As Jews, our public behavior does affect others -- not just our family members but also other Jews we have never met but nevertheless to whom we have a responsibility. This holds true for all of us, not just those of us who make it into the press. One's personal conduct as a Jew reflects on Jews throughout the world, as we are viewed as "one" people by non-Jews. When Jews were herded into the gas chambers in Auschwitz, there was one line for all Jews. Differences between various Jewish groups may, unfortunately, be real within the Jewish community but to the non-Jewish world, we speak and act with one voice and are all viewed as the same.

A decision, therefore, to wear a yarmulke in the workplace, for example, carries with it an extra measure of responsibility. Giving up one's seat to an elderly person on a crowded subway is a rather ordinary act of kindness. When performed by a boy wearing a yarmulke or a religious girl dressed modestly, however, such behavior can make a meaningful statement about the Jewish people as a whole. Even simple acts like holding a door open for someone can be a kiddush Hashem when the person exhibiting this courtesy is announcing to the world, through his or her dress, "I am an observant Jew."

On the other hand, the boisterous behavior of a group of teenagers sporting yarmulkes can have a negative impact, as bystanders will question whether religious kids always act in such an offensive and obnoxious manner. In a world where anti-Semitism flourishes and where the State of Israel is increasingly isolated, we do not need to encourage more people to dislike us.

MORE HONEST, MORE CAREFUL

Those who openly display their Judaism have an obligation to be more honest, more careful, more courteous and more prudent.

Those who openly display their devotion to God and Judaism have an obligation to be more honest, more careful, more courteous and more prudent. A truly religious Jew must also be a law-abiding citizen and must act in a manner consistent with what one would expect of a deeply religious person. He or she must remain aware at all times that when a religious Jew takes even a slight misstep, it can be magnified beyond any measure of reasonableness.

An unfortunate example of this is when the media highlights unsafe conditions in an apartment building cited for hundreds of city housing code violations, and the "slumlord" is identified as an Orthodox Jew. Such a news story makes all Jews cringe, even when the landlord is not at fault, as in the case of tenant-created building code violations. Nevertheless, the damage is done, as the story hook that captures the media's interest is the "rich" Jewish landlord who allows "poor" tenants to wallow in misery. We are vulnerable as a people. This truth makes it incumbent upon all of us to be better at what we do and more careful about how we do it.

FROM KOLLEL TO WALL STREET

Thousands of young Jewish men and women spend several years engaged in full-time Torah study in yeshivot in the United States and in Israel, where they are exposed to the depth and richness of Judaism, but receive little or no preparation for confronting the challenges of the "real" world. Young people must be prepared to face the prospect of paying taxes, applying for credit cards and living within a personal budget. Similarly, they must be prepared to contend with the complicated application process required to obtain student loans, scholarships or research grants. These applications are generally submitted under oath, with severe sanctions imposed for inaccurate or false reporting.

How to respond to official inquires, what information to provide, how to obtain assistance that one is legally entitled to and how to refrain from applying for funding that one is not entitled to are all important issues that must be addressed from a legal as well as a Torah perspective.

Many young people are simply not aware of the serious consequences that can ensue when state or federal laws are broken or when regulations affecting ordinary business commerce are ignored, even when the intent is not corrupt. But having good intentions or being ignorant of the law is not a legitimate excuse for breaking the law, nor is it a valid defense in a court of law.

BAD BEHAVIOR FOR A GOOD CAUSE

There are some individuals who rationalize breaking the law for the sake of a mitzvah. From a halachic perspective, this is unacceptable; the Eighth of the Ten Commandments states "Thou shall not steal"; it does not state "Thou shall not steal -- unless you think you have a really good reason." From a purely legal standpoint, crime for a good reason can still lead to very severe consequences. While the motive behind a legal violation may, on rare occasion, impact on the severity of the punishment imposed, in most cases it does not help one escape prosecution or punishment.

In a case with which I am familiar, a young couple needing a place to live applied for government-subsidized housing. To qualify for the housing, however, a salary cap had to be verified as such housing is intended for those who earn below a certain level of income. The husband, together with a sympathetic employer, arranged for some "off the books" compensation as part of his salary, thereby creating the false impression that the salary cap had not been exceeded. Because of his naivete, the husband felt this kind of legal infraction was "no big deal," and the employer, who knew it was not right, really believed he was doing a great mitzvah. The number of complicated legal issues that arose when this scheme was discovered was staggering. It led to criminal prosecution with severe consequences for both the husband and the employer. Moreover, it forced many other Jews into the terrible predicament of being required by law to testify against fellow Jews or risk prosecution themselves. A similar situation arises when an individual who does not qualify for his company's health care plan because of a pre-existing medical condition purposely conceals the condition from the insurer in order to fraudulently obtain health insurance. This is wrong, even if the deception is committed in order to deal with a catastrophic illness. Indeed, all who assist in carrying out this fraud, although acting for "humanitarian" reasons, may nevertheless face very serious consequences because of an insurance industry that is generally unsympathetic, and a rabid media that devours human-interest stories that contain an extra measure of irony or sadness.

The "mitzvah" excuse often also carries over into the education arena. Thus, it is wrong for a private day school to encourage parents to provide inaccurate or even patently false financial information in order to permit students to qualify for government assistance or scholarship subsidies for which they would otherwise not be entitled. Is obtaining a good Jewish education for a Jewish child worth the risk of criminal prosecution? Obviously not. At the time the crime is committed, however, the focus is not on the potential consequences or even on the halachic ramifications. It is on how to accomplish the objective at hand -- how to skirt the rules, do the "mitzvah" and then rationalize the behavior so that it appears to be consistent with the principles that a religious organization is supposed to adhere to. The fact is that a lie for a good reason is still a lie. A crime committed to help oneself or someone else is still a crime --it is against the law and against halachah, exposing oneself to punishment in two worlds!

THE GOVERNMENT IS NOT THE ENEMY

Following the Holocaust, hundreds of thousands of survivors devoted to their faith came to this country where they found true refuge. Most of these new citizens escaped from countries where the government was indeed the enemy, intent on murder, with Jews singled out for vicious brutality and death. As a result, many of the children of these immigrants were raised hearing extraordinary tales of what their parents had to do in order to survive. In some cases, passports and identity papers were forged or obtained though bribery, allowing borders to be crossed and parents and children to be reunited. Under those circumstances, breaking the law was justified.

This "survival" mentality is at least in part responsible for trivializing the obligation to strictly comply with government rules. But we must understand and make our children understand that in the United States, the government is not the enemy. The life of the Jew has improved over time. It has dramatically improved in this country, and our children need to understand that they no longer need to violate the rules in order to survive. Indeed, our persistence as a pious, respected and learned people is dependent on our living by rules -- rules imposed by the Torah, rules imposed by society.

LOOKING AHEAD

You cannot be strictly observant yet pick the rules you live by.

You cannot be strictly observant yet pick the rules you live by. Torah Judaism does not allow for selective enforcement of halachah, nor does it permit the violation of secular laws.

Day schools and yeshivot across the spectrum must strive to address the ethical issues that our students will confront in the world at large. We must impress upon them that as Jews, their behavior in the public sector will speak for an entire people. It is also important that we emphasize the obligation of the Orthodox Jew in particular to behave properly at all times. It is not enough to be a good law-abiding citizen; we need to act with proper decorum, to be courteous and kind, to be a mensch at home and on the street in order to make a kiddush Hashem.

Finally, we must teach the next generation to be thankful that we live in a democracy in which all people are given extraordinary freedom and opportunity. We must be grateful to this great country that opened its arms to so many of our grandparents and great-grandparents, providing refuge, security, freedom, tolerance and for helping all Jews practice their faith without fear, and with great pride.

Reprinted with permission from Jewish Action, the official print publication of the Orthodox Union

 

Published: February 25, 2006


Give Tzedakah! Help Aish.com create inspiring
articles, videos and blogs featuring timeless Jewish wisdom.

Visitor Comments: 21

(21) Anonymous, December 24, 2013 2:26 PM

Thank you for inspiring me to make a kiddush Hashem in the workplace!

Thank you for your well written and motivating article. It makes me feel proud to be a Jew in the workplace, where I have an opportunity to make a kiddush Hashem constantly.

(20) Anonymous, March 8, 2006 12:00 AM

A question on a Jew's responsibility in the workplace

An interesting articel which I most defeinitely agree with. The question I have is what responsibility does a Jew have when they discover illegal activities within the workplace? Reporting these almost always leads to "persecution/discrimination" by/from management, particularly when management is the culprit. Is it more important to that the truth be exposed or should one rather avoid the so called suffering and believe that G-d will execute absolute justice?

(19) jeff benjamin, March 6, 2006 12:00 AM

a different point of view, shouldn't automaticly labeled attack

To disagree by supporting a position with facts is not cause to label a dissenting comment an attack. The flaw in the counselors presentation is the law is subject to interpretation and usually has varied application depending on the politics of the enforcing authority. The comment-- The spirit of the law-- vs. The letter of the law-- should invoke a cosmic discussion about-- intent-- which is the first principle consideration in kabbala

(18) jeff benjamin, March 6, 2006 12:00 AM

final comment for consideration

The history of the Jewish people is one of dissent concerning applications of externally proscribed laws. When all laws both divine and secular are administered with the absolute common good of all humanity, without exception or qualification, then adherence without questions may be possible. Laws are designed to control the behavior of society, given the current level of human consciousness, it would be a risky choice to not question the reasoning behind laws, their application, enforcement and punishment by a society that has as many problems as the current one, with basic-- intent-- as the motivation which produce laws and resulting benefits.-- Intent-- which empowers humanity selectively, is not divine and should not be become religious doctrine.

(17) jeff benjamin, March 2, 2006 12:00 AM

the lawyer practices a double standard

A condition of the practice of law allows for the defence not to disclose issues or information injurious to itself, I refuse to testify on the grounds it may be detrimental to my person, or words to that effect. The current standard practiced by our government appears to contradict the position of the author where as the very institution making the laws and enforcing them is guilty of breaking them for the purpose of the benefit of it's own position.

See All Comments

Submit Your Comment:

  • Display my name?

  • Your email address is kept private. Our editor needs it in case we have a question about your comment.


  • * required field 2000
Submit Comment
stub
Sign up today!