click here to jump to start of article
  • Torah Reading: Naso
Join Our Newsletter

Get latest articles and videos with Jewish inspiration and insights​

The Jewish Ethicist: Priority in Charitable Giving

The Jewish Ethicist: Priority in Charitable Giving

Since our resources are limited, we can't help everyone in the world. Who do we help first?


Q. Our community has a charity fund, but there are many opinions on how we should distribute them. Some say we should focus on members of our congregation, while others go so far as to favor aid to developing nations. What does Jewish tradition state?

A. Jewish law recognizes that any needy person who lives in peaceful coexistence with us is a worthy charity recipient. The Talmud teaches that we should help support the poor even outside our own community, because of the "ways of peace". (1)

At the same time, the vast number of needy people and our limited resources mean that we have to establish priorities. Our Sages learn that the language of the Torah itself contains the key to these priorities.

"When there will be a needy person from among your brethren, in one of your gates in your land that the Lord your God has given you, don't harden your heart and don't close your hand from your needy brother. Surely open your hand and lend him according to his need that is lacking to him" (Deuteronomy 15:7-8).

Rashi's commentary points out that the description of the poor person uses the relatively unusual word "needy," indicating that the neediest individuals come first. And the mention of "your gates" indicates that the poor of your city precede those from other cities.

A similar inference is made from a verse in Exodus (22:24). "When you lend to my people, to the poor among you, don't dun him for the debt; don't impose usury." As Rashi explains, this teaches that "my people" precede members of other nations, while the word "poor" shows that a poor person precedes a better off one, even though even a wealthy person may sometimes be in need of temporary aid. "Among you" -- the poor of your city come before those of other places.

From both sources we can see the special value of giving loans, rather than outright gifts. Jewish law considers loans as generally the highest form of charity. Among the advantages of loans: they don't embarrass the recipient; they represent a "vote of confidence" that the person will eventually establish himself; and they don't cultivate dependency to the same extent as gifts do. Of course there are many cases where loans are impractical, but the above verses do remind us of their special value when applicable.

One reason why "charity begins at home" is a practical one. Since our resources are limited, we can't reasonably help everyone in the world, so we might as well start with the people who are closest to us, whose needs we can most easily evaluate, and who are most likely to be able to reciprocate the need as people's fortunes are subject to vicissitudes. The Talmud learns from the same passage in Deuteronomy that "Poverty is a turning wheel" -- today's donor may be tomorrow's recipient. (2)

But there is also a deeper reason to favor those close to us. In many places we find that the commandment of charity is carried out in a way which cultivates our feeling of generosity. This is best done with the people closest to us. A similar message is found in the verse "Love your neighbor as yourself" (Leviticus 19:18). While it would have been enough to command "Love your neighbor," the addition "as yourself" reminds us that a person who doesn't love himself will find it hard to love his neighbor. Likewise, a person who doesn't show genuine concern for members of his own community will find it hard to sustain feelings of concern beyond it. So the laws of charity mandate a set of "concentric circles" of concern.

So for a community charity fund, the main emphasis in charitable giving should be on the local community, and for cases of real deprivation. When congregation members are in significant need they should have priority over outsiders. Some lesser but still meaningful amount should also be earmarked for other needy individuals in your area and for cases of extreme deprivation beyond, so that we can also promote the ways of peace.

SOURCES: (1) Babylonian Talmud Gittin 59b. (2) Babylonian Talmud Shabbat 151b

Send your queries about ethics in the workplace to

To sponsor a column of the Jewish Ethicist, please click here.

The Jewish Ethicist presents some general principles of Jewish law. For specific questions and direct application, please consult a qualified Rabbi.

The Jewish Ethicist is a joint project of and the Business Ethics Center of Jerusalem. To find out more about business ethics and Jewish values for the workplace, visit the Business Ethics Center of Jerusalem at

March 25, 2006

Give Tzedakah! Help create inspiring
articles, videos and blogs featuring timeless Jewish wisdom.
The opinions expressed in the comment section are the personal views of the commenters. Comments are moderated, so please keep it civil.

Visitor Comments: 2

(2) Daniela, March 27, 2006 12:00 AM

Ripple effect

I liked the article, but I felt a key explanation of the idea of "charity begins at home" was missing.

Giving to people close to home produces a kind of ripple effect where people close at hand are effected in a way that extends beyond them from person to person, broadening its scope like a ripple effect on water after tossing in a small stone. This is one of the ways we act as a light unto the nations. People see how we take care of each other and how we live despite economic hardships, after which they can choose to learn from us and emulate us (which I myself have actually seen happen). We very much lead by example, and not enough can be seen from the action of giving to people so far away.

Besides, it too often happens that the main motivation for giving to people in far away countries is so others can see more readily that the giving was done (thereby garnering attention so other people know they care about the world) but since they don't have to see the actual effects of the giving, a great deal of feeling of responsibility is avoided. You write the check and that's the end of it. Whoever is there working in the organizations that give the money at the other end are the ones who have to deal with the reality of the matter. People can feel like they're doing their part, their version of Tikkun Olam, which for non-religious Jews means repairing the problems of the world rather than anything spiritual. So they get to feel better rather than see justice and its obligations right in front of them, which makes a lot of problems look like nothing but daunting. Not to mention the aversion they have to anything that would have them associated with the self-important and ego-centric views of the world they think the Orthodox have, where everyone else is either dismissed or ignored.

In my opinion, since the world benefits from observing how we live, we have a primary obligation to help those of our own people closer to home first, which is what Jews have indeed traditionally done. The world can then see how we live and learn to take care of *their* own. Let the nations of the world understand what their obligations are, to seek justice for their own poor and learn from us how the word Tzedakah means Justice and not Charity. How much more true could this be when you consider how much poverty in the world is actually attributed to politics, dictators and fighting war lords ?

Helping each other first is acually what we're meant to do, and I think what Hashem wants us to do, because it's part of our purpose in this world. To teach the nations of the world that they should be taking care of their own the same way we take care of our own.

(1) Joey, March 26, 2006 12:00 AM

I've always figured...

...that it was best to give money to the really poor nations of the world, as even the poorest person in America or Israel is well-off compared to the average Ethiopian, and because (at least in theory) anyone in one of those countries can improve their situation, while the Wheel of Poverty never seems to turn up for those in other nations...but in a spiritual sense, as always, the Biblical approach makes sense. Aid should probably be given to both places, and to as many people as possible. God bless!

Submit Your Comment:

  • Display my name?

  • Your email address is kept private. Our editor needs it in case we have a question about your comment.

  • * required field 2000
Submit Comment