The Jewish Ethicist: When to Blow the Whistle
click here to jump to start of article
Join Our Newsletter

Get latest articles and videos with Jewish inspiration and insights​




The Jewish Ethicist: When to Blow the Whistle

The Jewish Ethicist: When to Blow the Whistle

Saving others from loss doesn't have to come at your expense.

by

Q. In a recent column, you advised a person working in a criminal environment how he can avoid personal responsibility for wrongdoing. Isn't this evading ethical responsibility for preventing crime?

A. A number of readers wrote with variations of this valid question. Due to restrictions of time and space, each column can deal with only one aspect of a question; the aspect I related to was the one most relevant to the asker. But the one you raise is equally important and we will discuss it now. I emphasize that everything in this column refers only to causing monetary harm, and does not necessary apply when an employer's activity involves danger to life.

Any time we witness wrongdoing, we have a responsibility to intervene. The first responsibility is to the wrongdoer. Even if the crime is a totally victimless one such as a ritual transgression (for example, desecrating the Sabbath), we have a responsibility to reprove the wrongdoer, to remind him of his religious and ethical obligations and help him return to the proper track. This is the essence of the Torah commandment of reproof: "Surely reprove your fellow, and don't bear sin towards him." (Leviticus 19:17.)

Another aspect of the responsibility to protest is the problem of condoning wrongdoing, as mentioned in the previous column. Anyone who is present when wrongdoing takes place and fails to protest may be seen as condoning the wrongdoing and being to some extent complicit in it.

 

Anyone who has the ability to protest the members of his household but doesn't protest, is held liable for the members of his household. For the residents of his city – he is held liable for the residents of his city. For the entire world – he is liable for the entire world. (1)

 

Again, this can apply even in a "victimless crime." We could view this as a responsibility to ourselves, to decisively disassociate ourselves from sin.

Above all, there is an ethical responsibility towards the victim. The Torah commands, "Don't stand idly by the blood of your neighbor" (Leviticus 19:16), thus creating an affirmative duty to protect others from harm. This above all creates a general ethical obligation to warn someone if he is being defrauded. (As we have mentioned in previous columns, disclosure is proper only if it is necessary for protecting the interests of the victim and doesn't cause disproportionate harm to the perpetrator.)

However, all of these obligations have their limits. Just as we don't have to incur significant bodily danger in order to save others from bodily danger, likewise a person doesn't have to incur financial loss in order to save others from financial loss. That means that if you are not personally involved in the wrongdoing, you are exempt from warning others if it involves personal loss – especially if it is irretrievable personal loss.

Rabbi Moshe Isserles writes in his authoritative glosses to the Shulchan Arukh (authoritative Code of Jewish Law):

 

Even though a person is obligated to protest wrongdoers, and anyone who doesn't protest and has the ability to protest is liable for that transgression, even so a person is not obligated to spend money on this. Therefore it is customary to take a lenient approach to transgressors, when there is a fear they may harm our person or possessions. (2)

 

Sadly, experience shows that so-called "whistle-blowers" usually suffer great personal loss and anguish. They almost invariably lose their jobs and in many cases lose their careers. Therefore, while it is certainly praiseworthy to protect people from fraud as soon as possible, I generally advise people to think through the consequences very carefully before they take such a far-reaching step. The essential first step is to make sure that you yourself are not participating in any wrongdoing. Usually the next step is to try to disengage yourself from the morally toxic work environment, by finding a new job. For most people, only then it will be practical for them to contemplate righting the wrong by blowing the whistle.

SOURCES: (1) Babylonian Talmud Shabbat 54b (2) Shulchan Arukh Yoreh Deah 334:48

 

Published: July 5, 2009


Give Tzedakah! Help Aish.com create inspiring
articles, videos and blogs featuring timeless Jewish wisdom.

Visitor Comments: 4

(4) Anonymous, May 14, 2012 2:24 PM

family

Father wealthy but tax evader, died without a will. Brother appropiates 3/4 of property mother the rest. Should i sue them? Blow the whistle on tax evasion and accomplices? Thanks.

(3) Anita, September 2, 2009 12:58 PM

What if...

Hi, Here's a question: I just lost a job recently because I believe my supervisor was anti-Semitic. While I am not Jewish, I do wear a Star of David and I heard her make an extremely anti-Semitic comment in my presence. I was offended because she works in a business that has a name that can be construed as Jewish and serves food that can be construed as Jewish as well. She has several Jewish customers. She never said it in front of THEM, but she did say it in front of me. I never said anything to her about it, but I felt like I was the personal whipping boy; every time something went wrong in the restaurant, I was the one that got in trouble for it and I eventually lost my position because of it. Should I have said something?

(2) yaakov schwartz, July 8, 2009 3:06 PM

Whistle blowing Obligations of A Gift

Rabbi Meir Situation: Whistle Blowing Obligations Relative To A Gift One is given stock in a company. (It is a gift - not earned) Alleged misappropriation of funds occur - reallocating funds from the gifted company to companyh #2 (a separate company in ownership percentages though there is interlocking directorates) to prop up company #2.) Furhermore there is non compliance relative to shareholder meetings and approvals for these actions. Given if the stock was bought or earned, I understand the whislteblowing obligations and parameters. But when the gift is from the company vast majority owner of both companies (though these companies are separate and non consolidated) - what is the whistle blowing obligation when the stock is a gift from the owner who allegedly is misappropriating material funds? As well, Is there an obligation to the other shareholders who may be damaged?

(1) Isidora, July 6, 2009 7:24 AM

True to the mother's tounge... I think.

Stay happy. Be happy. Jewish people are the most gifted of all. And so do G-d to all of us.

Submit Your Comment:

  • Display my name?

  • Your email address is kept private. Our editor needs it in case we have a question about your comment.


  • * required field 2000
Submit Comment
stub
Sign up today!