The Jewish Ethicist: Lender Responsibility
click here to jump to start of article
Join Our Newsletter

Get latest articles and videos with Jewish inspiration and insights​




The Jewish Ethicist: Lender Responsibility

The Jewish Ethicist: Lender Responsibility

Lenders have an ethical responsibility not to put borrowers in an untenable situation.

by

Q. Do lenders have a responsibility to check the creditworthiness of borrowers?

A. The first responsibility of lenders to check out borrowers is fiscal. If the borrower is unable to pay, then the lender will not get his money back. One might think that this responsibility is enough, but the rabbis took pains to point out that there is also an ethical responsibility of lenders.

Rabbi Yaakov ben Asher, one of the most important legal codifiers of the Middle Ages, describes the delicate balance of obligation between lender and borrower.

The lender is not allowed to dun the borrower if the borrower is unable to pay. In that case, the collection actions are just harassment:

    It is forbidden to dun the borrower to make him repay if it is known that he has nothing. Even to appear before him is forbidden, because he will be ashamed when he sees the lender and has nothing to give. (1)

This ruling is in fact just an application of the Torah prohibition (Exodus 22:24), "When you lend to My people, to the poor among you, don't be to him as a creditor, [and] don't impose interest on him."

However, this limitation creates the potential for the borrower to exploit this ethical obligation by neglecting his own obligation to do his utmost to pay. Against this, Rabbi Yaakov ben Asher writes:

    Just as it is forbidden for the lender to demand payment, so it is forbidden for the borrower to hide his money and say "come back tomorrow" when he really has. And likewise it is forbidden for the borrower to take a loan and spend it needlessly and waste the money so that the lender will not find from where to collect, and if he does so he is considered wicked.

Yet this also creates a countervailing ethical obligation:

    If the lender is aware that the borrower has this tendency, it is better not to lend rather than lend and then be required to dun, and thus transgress the prohibition of "Don't be to him as a creditor".

Obviously the lender already has a monetary incentive not to lend to weak borrowers, because after all they can't pay. But ending up in that situation is bad not only for the lender, but also for the borrower, and for society as a whole. Futile collection actions take up unnecessary energy and ultimately involve a kind of harassment.

I believe the same applies to the recent financial crisis. The lack of caution of lenders involved them in a monetary loss because people couldn't pay back. But that is not the total extent of the damage. Some lenders passed the loans on to other creditors, and much of the debt was ultimately passed on to the public in various explicit and implicit bailouts.

Beyond that is the human cost for the many borrowers who are now in a worse situation than if they had never taken out the loans in the first place.

Jewish tradition makes clear that if lenders plan to take aggressive steps to collect their loans, they have not only a prudential but also an ethical obligation to take reasonable steps to check the credit-worthiness of borrowers.

SOURCES: (1) Tur Choshen Mishpat 97

Published: February 27, 2010


Give Tzedakah! Help Aish.com create inspiring
articles, videos and blogs featuring timeless Jewish wisdom.

Visitor Comments: 3

(3) Folke Holtz, March 3, 2010 1:32 PM

Very wise prescription.

very wise prescription. I have never heard anything like this before anywhere. This and much more shows the wisdom of the Torah since it was given at Sinai. What the Torah teach us written or/and Oral is what people even today after the crises still don´t understand or practize. This shows how important it is to live a full Torah-observant life. Thank you very much.

(2) Mark Douglas Obenour, March 2, 2010 9:39 PM

Are Corporations worth more than people?

It seems there is more value these days to corporations than humans. We were told that corporations were TOO BIG to be allowed to go under as that would be devistating to our nations economy. Yet we are allowed to personally not get bailed out and fail one-by-one. That is okay as long as it doesn't affect your health care...or your food stamps...or your unemployment check. The people with their heads in the sand will find out that Like Esther in the story of Purim the adversity will come upon them too...rain or adversity finds the just and the unjust and they themselves will have to fight to survive against the odds. May we all have the strength to endure it!. Thank G-d, I always ran into ethical lenders that told me when I could not afford a loan. Business and Banking should be the same way!!

(1) SusanE, February 28, 2010 5:39 PM

Thank You!!

Thank You Rabbi Dr. Asher Meir, for the clear, easy to understand obligations and ethics between Lenders and Borrowers. You have answer my questions. Thoroughly enjoy all the discussions in the Jewish Ethicist!

Submit Your Comment:

  • Display my name?

  • Your email address is kept private. Our editor needs it in case we have a question about your comment.


  • * required field 2000
Submit Comment
stub
Sign up today!