click here to jump to start of article
  • Torah Reading: Tzav
Join Our Newsletter

Get latest articles and videos with Jewish inspiration and insights​

The Jewish Ethicist: You Need This

The Jewish Ethicist: You Need This

What was previously a luxury may become a necessity.


Q. Marketers sometimes try to convince us to buy things we never thought we wanted. Is that ethical?

A. Advertisers and marketers are always trying to induce consumers to buy their product or service, but the means are varied. Some ads merely provide pertinent information about the attributes and price of a product already sought by the consumer; this kind of advertising is uncontroversial. Sometimes the ads provide absolutely no information about the product; the object is to associate the product with a particular image and thus persuade the consumer that it will advance him in projecting or realizing that type of image.

But often marketers are involved in the business of "want creation". They will try to convince a consumer that a particular product, which they have never contemplated buying, can serve their needs. Contemporary secular commentators are divided on this topic. Economist and social critic John Kenneth Galbraith refused to consider created wants as real wants. He wrote that "the tendency of wants to rise as production rises, as a consequence of that increased production . . . implies that it cannot be assumed that consumers' utility will rise with production."

By contrast, advertising pioneer Bruce Barton asserted a generation earlier that astute marketing is needed to overcome the natural hesitance of consumers to adopt new habits that can really make their lives better.  Barton wrote in 1925 that "Elias Howe invented the sewing machine, but it nearly rusted away before American women could be persuaded to use it" because Howe was not a gifted salesman. By Barton's time, it was taken for granted that the sewing machine brought a great advance in standard of living.

I believe that the Jewish sages legitimized upward mobility in consumption. The Talmud sometimes uses an expression "All Israel are princes" to express the idea that even what luxury goods are not inherently beyond the lifestyle of even simple people. I understand this to mean that poor people need not consider these products out of reach, and that a desire for them is legitimate.

For example, there is a law that on Shabbat we may not use items that are designated for medicinal use except in cases of proven medical need. "Rose oil" was an expensive tincture, which poor people would only use for medicinal purposes, but wealthy people could afford to use it for a perfume. The mishna states that even poor people can use this product on Shabbat, for "all Israel are princes". (1) It is legitimate if today he thinks of it as a medicine, and tomorrow as a consumer product.

Another example is eligibility for charity. A person is eligible for charity if he doesn't have enough for his "needs", but what are these needs? The authoritative codifier Rabbi Yaakov ben Asher rules that these are different from one generation to another. An amenity that is luxurious in one generation may be considered a basic necessity in another; "everything is according to the place and time".(2) Once running water was considered a luxury, but today someone who lacked running water would be considered to be living below subsistence. So this is a created need, but one that is given legitimation within Jewish life.

Of course this insight does not legitimate any kind of advertising. Some goods or services are inappropriate for a Jewish lifestyle; others may induce envy or overspending. Even if it is proper to encourage people to adopt a product they are unfamiliar with, proper means have to be used in doing so; for example, we discussed a few weeks ago Judaism's disapproval of provocative messages in advertisements. But the basic idea of trying to convince someone to buy a product he didn't even know he wanted is not unethical.

SOURCES: (1) Mishna Shabbat 14:4 (2) Tur Yoreh Deah 253, see also Ahavat Chesed, epilogue.

January 16, 2011

Give Tzedakah! Help create inspiring
articles, videos and blogs featuring timeless Jewish wisdom.
The opinions expressed in the comment section are the personal views of the commenters. Comments are moderated, so please keep it civil.

Visitor Comments: 4

(4) Rachel, January 18, 2011 7:11 PM

Needs and health

I didn't bother with an electirc toothbrush, thinking it was just one more unnecessary gadget -- and then my dentist told me that it works SO much better that I was doing myself a disservice by not getting one. That being said, I don't have an ipod, and only got a cellphone when my health deteriorated and my family was concerned about being able to reach me when I'm not at home.

(3) Anonymous, January 18, 2011 6:53 PM

The "advertising" in movies and tv is called "product placement." The vendor of products that they want to be shown are placed with full label front or are at least mentioned in some way, or as part of the decor on a set. Although it is still advertising, the movie or tv program might not get made without it. The producers of these products will pay to have their products in plain view. It is still advertising, I agree, however some of the movies that this people may want to or need to see would not be made without it. I still despise commercials and turn them all down. There is not one thing that I have purchased that has been from a televised commercial. The products (and the people who produce the commercial use very young women) like cosmetics that are supposed to make you look radiant or younger are total silliness and I don't like them. Use older women if they want to prove some point. I happen to believe that I have earned my wrinkles and moisture is my sole goal. Some producers of products actually go right into lying to get the product sold and I fully object to that. I believe that we all should object and not just laugh it off. Changing their tactics would show that they finally see that we are not all idiots and won't buy their products if they continue to lie to us. I still mute the commercials! I don't like the annoyance they bring.

(2) Anonymous, January 18, 2011 6:01 PM

Nice article.

Nice article. The examples were very helpful

(1) Susane, January 16, 2011 2:40 PM

Keeping Up with The Jones' Monkey.

Generally, if a product is bought by one consumer and he brags about it, others adopt a monkey see monkey do attitude and purchase the product whether they need it or not. Actually they don't even 'want' it until they see someone else with it.. Granite countertops. Flat screen TV. Cosmetics, Branded handbag. The masses will have the monkey see monkey want attitude. Nobody needed a salad spinner or Thigh Master but millions were sold because of advertising to the masses. Tobacco and drugs and alcohol and many charities are advertised the same way. I don't necessarily blame the blantent advertisers, anyone with a working brain can say no to any unnecessary product. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ It's the subtle advertising that I have a problem with. The inclusion of a product or of a brand in a movie, or in a Television show to create want. Banks and insurance companies have hidden agendas in advertised offers. We used to call it subliminal advertising. I would call that unethical.

Submit Your Comment:

  • Display my name?

  • Your email address is kept private. Our editor needs it in case we have a question about your comment.

  • * required field 2000
Submit Comment