Dzhokhar Tsarnaev on Rolling Stone Cover
click here to jump to start of article
Join Our Newsletter

Get latest articles and videos with Jewish inspiration and insights​




Terrorist on Rolling Stone Cover

Terrorist on Rolling Stone Cover

Where is our human decency and compassion?

by

Rolling Stone magazine is being bombarded by criticism for its cover treatment and photograph of Boston bombing suspect Dzhokhar Tsarnaev. The article, by contributing editor Janet Reitman, is called “The Bomber: How a popular, promising student was failed by his family, fell into radical Islam and became a monster.” The feature includes interviews with childhood and college friends, teachers, neighbors and police officers. Readers, especially from Boston, bashed the magazine on its Facebook page, claiming that the cover page is turning a terrorist into a “rock star.”

CVS pharmacy, Walgreens and Massachusetts-based Tedeschi convenience stores all said that they are refusing to sell copies of the magazine. Tedeschi Food Shops wrote on its Facebook page that “it cannot support actions that serve to glorify the evil actions of anyone. Music and terrorism don’t mix.” The Woonsocket, R.I-based chain CVS wrote on its Facebook page: “As a company with deep roots in New England and a strong presence in Boston, we believe this is the right decision out of respect for the victims of the attack and their loved ones.”

Some of the reader comments on Rolling Stone Facebook page wrote:

“Jeff Bauman, who lost both legs, should be on the cover.”

“The best example of why Facebook needs a dislike button.”

“I am so disappointed with Rolling Stone magazine. I have enjoyed your magazine until now. I will no longer buy/read the mag. You have just made him a ‘rock star.’ How could you?”

Reading these comments and seeing the glamorized portrait of this murderer reminded me of a conversation I had at a dinner party in New York years ago. We were visiting from Israel during the height of the intifada, and it seemed like every week there was another terrorist attack. We couldn’t go into a restaurant or board a bus without glancing around in fear, and we had been a few blocks away when the Sbarro pizza shop was bombed. Still in New York, I could hear the echo of that horrific explosion and the sirens that seemed to never end afterwards.

One of the people seated at our table began talking about Israel and asked me whether I thought that the terrorists should be pitied because of their impoverished circumstances. I almost choked on my food. How could he? Does poverty excuse murder? Does being taught evil excuse a person from making up his own mind to actualize that evil?

I didn’t say any of that. Instead I stared at him for a moment before asking, “If one of your children had been killed in a terrorist attack, would you ask that kind of question? If you had lost an arm or a leg yourself, would you ask this question?’

“Yes, I believe I would,” he replied.

I didn’t answer him, and I didn’t believe him. Not for a moment. And I don’t believe that the editor of Rolling Stone would publish such an article if she had lost her legs in a bombing. Or her child. Or her arms. Or felt anything close to the pain that the victims of the Boston marathon bombing are still grappling with.

This past Tisha B’Av Rabbi Wallerstein read out loud a list of suffering in our generation: the infertile, the impoverished, the lonely people who can’t find spouses, the drug addicts, people suffering from cancer, from eating disorders, from marriage problems… The list was long, and at the end of it he paused and said that some of the people listening are not afflicted with anything on that list. And perhaps, there are some of us who have happy marriages and beautiful children and secure finances and health. And perhaps we hear the above list and think, That’s sad, but what does it have to do with me? My life is fine so who cares? We don’t say it, but perhaps we sometimes think it.

This lack of empathy is the antithesis of Judaism. If we can’t feel another’s pain, then God can’t feel our pain. If we can’t put ourselves in someone else’s place, then we don’t have a real sense of a spiritual self. There is no such thing as “mind your own business” in Torah.

A young man once came to the Chafetz Chaim and begged him for a blessing to cure a terminal illness. The Chafetz Chaim gave him a blessing and soon afterwards, this young man was cured. Years later, a relative of the man was struck with the same disease, so the man returned to the Chafetz Chaim and asked for a blessing to cure his relative. The response of the Chafetz Chaim is chilling:

“Years ago, I gave you a blessing that you should be cured, but it wasn’t just the blessing that cured you. I fasted 30 days so that you should recover. And I’m sorry, but now I am too old to fast that way again.” For 30 days the Chafetz Chaim fasted for someone he didn’t even know. That is how deeply he felt the pain of another.

But we are so far from feeling one another’s pain. Where is our sense of human decency and compassion? How can we glorify a murderer on the same cover as a rock star? The pain of the victims of the Boston marathon bombing is still so raw. Many of them are learning how to live without limbs. Without children. Without bitterness. And here is a photograph screaming in their faces: “It didn’t happen to me. It’s very sad. But I don’t care. I’m more interested in sensationalizing this kid and showing everyone how ‘normal’ and victimized he was.”

This is not who we are. This is not who anyone should be, including the editors of Rolling Stone. Even if it makes a good story. It is a tragic failure to feel another person’s pain.

Let us know what you think of the Rolling Stone cover in the comment section below.

Published: July 17, 2013


Give Tzedakah! Help Aish.com create inspiring
articles, videos and blogs featuring timeless Jewish wisdom.

Visitor Comments: 150

(108) Aliza, July 25, 2013 8:26 AM

the truth about terrorists

the article is well done. there is one serious error, though, above and beyond that is is delusional to make excuses for terrorists, or rapists, or pedophiles or any criminal, and that is most of the terrorists during the intifada were not poor, did not come from poverty, and many were even educated. from the time they were young were all brain washed to think that to murder Jews, even to take their own lives doing it, would grant them blessings and positive eternity in heaven. if

(107) miriamwcohen, July 22, 2013 6:33 PM

read the article

I am not sure that putting him on the cover shows that he is a Rock Star at all. This is BIG NEWS, the goal is to sell magazines. What is important are the words, and they are not sympathetic to him at all. He is a failed human being, will be tried and convicted. We do not live in a country where the news is free and open. Don't buy the magazine; I have never bought a copy of this kind of magazine.

(106) Shevach Lambert, July 22, 2013 5:22 PM

Understanding is not glorifying

I do not believe that attempting to understand the reasons for a young man’s descent in radical Islam amounts to a lack of empathy for the victims of his actions. It seems to me that the RS article was attempting to educate us about the roots of such evil, not glorify its practitioners. Understanding why and how such an odious mentality can develop may at least help us learn how to pre-empt the next attack, while simply labeling him as ‘evil’ seems only to perpetuate the same kind of objectification of another human being that can be a precursor to that kind of mentality. If, as the author rightly insists, we must always strive to feel the pain of another, trying to expand that sense of empathy to at least understand those whose actions we can neither condone nor forgive can only make us better human beings.

(105) yaakov, July 22, 2013 4:46 PM

its all perspective....

i believe it is very hard hard for our generation to comprehend this and it may sound extreme but take with a grain of salt. these days it is hard for us to see the loss of a human life and the loss of a human soul as equal, but there was a time and a generation where this was recognized. its obviously hard to compare a rockstar to a terrorist,...but with a very pure mind...its not far fetched to recognize what the rockstar image along with all the profanities and all that a rockstar represents today (intense drug abuse,intense abuse on the image of woman,early suicides)...these people i believe represent the death of the soul....e.g....i would be scared if my sister looked admired someone like miley cirus,...just one of the millions who also lower the moral standard for woman around the world,...yet because they are put on some kind of pedestal,....young teenagers today just try to be like them....following this lifestyle will bring about the death of the soul,...to me equally as sad as the death of a human....in conclusion,....the terrorist is sticking by some sick belief and caused horrible damage to many people. 99 % of the cover people on rollingstone also follow some sick meaningless lifestyle and cause generations upon generations of irreparable damage to thousands of souls....i understand this may sound extreme,...its just a thought

(104) GabrlaMA, July 22, 2013 2:46 PM

Empathy

After examples of the public’s outrage for the Rolling Stone article, Sara Gutfreund finally enters her view of Dzhorkhar Tsarnaev. She calls him a murderer. Not once did she call him by his name. In her dinner party example when asked if terrorists should have pity due to impoverished circumstances, she did not process the question. Instead she blocked it and answered with a question. If one of your children had been killed in a terrorist attack, would you ask that kind of question? She asks. She reserves her empathy for the victims which people in hatred towards Dzhorkhar do. The angered first responses are questions as, “What about Martin Richard? What about the victims? Dzhorkhar Tsarnaev is not a monster or a bomber as the Rolling Stone article titles. Rolling Stone’s Janet Reitman describes how people knew Dzhorkhar in his community, and he was loved. With empathy we see how people are so much just like us, so similar, but in different circumstances and outcomes. Is this what opponents of Dzhorkhar Tsarnaev are afraid of that the article will force them to realize that he is extremely close to us. He is not an animal. He is not a terrorist. Now, they will be forced to challenge their hate. I return to Sara the words, “If we can’t put ourselves in someone else’s place, then we don’t have a real sense of a spiritual self.” As long as Sarah holds to names as terrorist and murderer; as long as she answers serious social questions of evaluation with questions, she will avoid the processing of empathy for this young man named Dzhorkhar Tsarnaev.

See All Comments

Submit Your Comment:

  • Display my name?

  • Your email address is kept private. Our editor needs it in case we have a question about your comment.


  • * required field 2000
Submit Comment
stub
Sign up today!