click here to jump to start of article
Join Our Newsletter

Get latest articles and videos with Jewish inspiration and insights​




The World’s Eight Richest Men

The World’s Eight Richest Men

They have wealth equal to half the population. It's a striking statistic but it's also irrelevant.

by

Oxfam grabbed headlines on Monday with a report claiming that the world's eight richest men own as much wealth as the world's poorest 3.7 billion people – half of the planet's population.

The report was released in Davos, Switzerland, at the start of the World Economic Forum, an annual powwow of high-powered business and political leaders. The executive director of Oxfam International, Winnie Byanyima, seized the occasion to portray the gap between the world's superrich few and extremely poor many as a moral and social calamity.

"It is obscene for so much wealth to be held in the hands of so few when 1 in 10 people survive on less than $2 a day," she said. "Inequality is trapping hundreds of millions in poverty; it is fracturing our societies and undermining democracy." Oxfam's proposed solutions are the usual leftist nostrums: higher taxes, a "living wage" for employees, more government spending.

Headlines notwithstanding, Oxfam's "new" finding is the same-old, same-old it trots out every year. In 2014, Oxfam reported that the world's 85 richest people have as much wealth as the 3.5 billion poorest; in 2015, it shaved the number of multibillionaires to 80; in 2016, the number dropped again, to 62. Now Oxfam claims the world's poorest half is out-owned by just eight men.

To be sure, it's a striking statistic. It's also irrelevant.

The eight superbillionaires singled out by Oxfam are Microsoft founder Bill Gates, investor Warren Buffett, Mexican telecom mogul Carlos Slim, Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg, Spanish clothing magnate Amancio Ortega, Amazon creator Jeff Bezos, Oracle co-founder Larry Ellison, and Michael Bloomberg, the financial-services entrepreneur and former New York mayor.

Besides being unimaginably rich, the eight men have a few things in common that Oxfam doesn't dwell on.

To begin with, all eight men earned their extraordinary wealth. Through ingenuity, talent, and immense effort, they created enterprises that provide hundreds of millions, even billions, of human beings with goods and services that make life better, healthier, safer, and more affordable.

Oxfam's billionaires are richer than they used to be. So is almost everyone else.

Moreover, the Oxfam Eight didn't grow their fortunes by preventing other people from growing theirs. Their wealth may equal that of half the people on Earth (though Oxfam's methodology is dubious), but the world's poor have been climbing out of poverty at the fastest rate in human history. Byanyima rightly bewails the fact that "1 in 10 people survive on less than $2 a day" – what she omits is that over the past 30 years, the number of people living in such extreme poverty has fallen by nearly 75 percent. Johan Norberg, writing in Spiked Review, provides hard numbers: Worldwide, an average of 138,000 people climb out of extreme poverty every day. Since 1990, the world's population has grown by more than 2 billion, yet the ranks of those in extreme poverty has shrunk by more than 1.25 billion.

It is, in Norberg's words, "the most important story of our time: Poverty as we know it is disappearing from our planet."

Just as capitalism made it possible for Gates, Zuckerberg, and the others to reach the highest rung on the economic ladder, it is making it possible for billions of men and women to climb up from the lowest rung. Oxfam's billionaires are richer than they used to be. So is almost everyone else.

Since 1990, the world's population has grown by more than 2 billion,
yet the number of people in extreme poverty has shrunk by more than 1.25 billion.

Of course, the super-wealthy ought to share their great fortunes. Not because wealth disparities are "obscene," as Oxfam says. And not because the economy is a zero-sum game, with the rich getting richer only as the poor get poorer. But as a matter of goodness and gratitude – the timeless moral principle that from those to whom much is given, much is required.

Instead of obsessing about what the very rich have, worry about what the very poor lack.

Oxfam's megabillionaires agree. They have all given vast amounts to charity, using their wealth to do good for enormous numbers of people in need, in danger, or in pain. Gates has donated more to charitable causes than anyone, ever. Buffett and Zuckerberg have pledged to give away more than half of their wealth to philanthropy, as have scores of other billionaires.

Wealth is good, and the more people who can create and earn it, the better. All decent people should worry about what the very poor lack. If you obsess instead about what the very rich have, you're doing it wrong.

This op-ed originally appeared in The Boston Globe.

 

January 18, 2017

Give Tzedakah! Help Aish.com create inspiring
articles, videos and blogs featuring timeless Jewish wisdom.
The opinions expressed in the comment section are the personal views of the commenters. Comments are moderated, so please keep it civil.

Visitor Comments: 28

(17) Gunther, June 27, 2017 1:37 PM

Lie, cheat, steal and born into rich families

Many of these people lie, steal their way from their workers and the government to wealth. They were also born into rich families that gave them resources to be successful.

. It is disgraceful that they have so much wealth while much of the Earth's population is trying to live on $2 to $10 a day.

(16) jim, January 25, 2017 3:25 AM

bigger fish to fry!

greater and more relevant issues confronting us!

(15) shilvib puri, January 24, 2017 1:45 AM

CORRECT!!!!!!!

CORRECT!!!!!!!

(14) Rachel, January 23, 2017 7:30 PM

Some of these men are rich because we buy their stuff

I don't buy nor use the services of Messrs Zuckerberg, Bezos, Ortega, Buffett, Slim, nor Bloomberg.

It's like I always say when people complain about salaries of top athletes and movie stars: if people didn't want what they offer, they wouldn't be so rich. It's too bad that society doesn't offer more tangible rewards to our teachers, police, military, firefighters, etc.

(13) Mike, January 22, 2017 4:59 PM

Capitalisim is good.

There is no other economic system ever created that has lifted mankind out of poverty faster or in greater numbers than capitalism. What else has worked? Communism was a total failure which led to the suffering of millions. Socialism only works when capitalists are around to pump money into the system. If it were not for billions of dollars sitting in Swiss banks, Switzerland would have only coo coo clocks and cheese. While it is true that capitalism must be regulated to prevent exploitation, it is still best system for creating innovation, free enterprise and abundance. These men should be instructing the next generation of economists, but instead they are vilified by the malcontents of the left.

See All Comments

Submit Your Comment:

  • Display my name?

  • Your email address is kept private. Our editor needs it in case we have a question about your comment.


  • * required field 2000
Submit Comment
stub