An act of mercy or murder? The controversy rages on as laws spring up legalizing doctor-assisted suicide.

by Sid Bernstein, Esq.

Reported on http://www.rights.org/ Sept. 30, 1997

Dr. Jack Kevorkian assisted in the suicide of a Colorado multiple sclerosis patient whose body was discovered in a motel room.
A letter released by the office of Kevorkian's lawyer stated that Kari Miller, 54, of Englewood, Colorado, left a note saying she could no longer sit or lie down because of the excruciating pain, and could hardly walk. Her body was found at a Red Roof Inn in a suburb of Detroit.
"The pain I was forced to live with and what the MS had done to me became intolerable," she wrote. MS "had robbed me of all my dignity and my zest for life."

THE FACTORS IN QUESTION

Should Kevorkian-style services be available to any patient who is terminally ill and facing certain death within six months?

Is there a difference whether the patient is in unremitting physical pain, or whether they are suffering from emotional despair?

Is it a relevant factor that the pain could be reduced through modern pain-management techniques?

Should the option of a support group and hospice care be made mandatory for all terminally ill patients?

POSTED COMMENTS

Barry Greenman wrote:

I oppose assisted suicide. It's a cheap way for the elite to avoid caring for the helpless.

Anita wrote:

I have seen the damage that Dr. Kevorkian has caused. What he calls "medicide," I call "murder." He has as much right to help someone kill themselves as I do. Only I would be arrested for the act.

Kathryn wrote:

My grandmother is very ill with Parkinson's Disease. She has been hospitalized for over 10 years. She lost her husband to cancer. She can no longer speak clearly or see very well. She has not walked in over nine years. She cannot feed herself and wears diapers. Influenza spreads through the hospital every now and then, and a few people die each time. Recently she started to choke on her food a lot, due to some of the medication she was on.

It hurts me very much to visit my grandmother and see her suffering ... but it also inspires me.

It hurts me very much to visit her and see her suffering ... but it also inspires me. She wants to live her life to the best of her capabilities as long as she possibly can. She is in pain and she is lonely and she is paralyzed, yet she still goes on living with a courage most people never see.

 

How can we judge for someone else whether they want to be alive or not if they cannot speak? It is not our place to take away from them the chance to try.We can pray for their recovery, but if none comes, it is not our place to destroy something that God made.

GenJLong@aol.com wrote:

If euthanasia becomes legal, many families will pressure grandma or grandpa to have it done, eliminating the expense of a final illness, and smelling a larger inheritance after they are gone. Health insurance providers will also start refusing to pay for expensive care in the last year of life, on the grounds that the patient is going to die anyway.

Why look for expensive cures for cancer when you can put the patient out of his misery for much less money?

In fact, with the chance of doing away with sick people, there will be less reason to spend millions on medical research. Why look for expensive cures for cancer when you can put the patient out of his misery for much less money? When people become old, confused, or depressed, their relatives will nag them to "do it," and many will yield to their family's pressure. People do not realize the full scope of evil they invite if they seek to legalize euthanasia.

OPINION OF DR. KOOP

Measure #16 was a referendum presented to the residents of the State of Oregon in 1994 concerning the "Death with Dignity Act." We present here the argument of C. Everett Koop:

As former United States Surgeon General, I have worked first hand in developing health care policies. Many proposed policies at first sound like good ideas, but in fact are very dangerous. Measure #16 is one of those policies.

Measure #16 confuses the role of physicians in our society. Doctors have an ethical and professional responsibility to sustain life when possible. Measure #16 would create an environment where physician-assisted suicide becomes the first line of defense against terminal diseases, resulting in final and fatal decisions. The medical profession cannot be society's healer and killer at the same time.

A patient's request for suicide is a signal that certain needs are not being met.

Measure #16 prescribes suicide as a treatment for disease. A patient's request for suicide is a signal that certain needs are not being met. Most likely, the patient is suffering from unnecessary pain or treatable depression. Doctors too often fail to dispense adequate pain management. The solution is to provide mental health treatment or better pain management, not drugs for suicide. This is the time for the doctor to be the patient's support, not his/her killer.

Measure #16 is ripe for abuse. The so-called safeguards built into Measure #16 are inadequate. Patients remain vulnerable to outside pressures to choose suicide. Physicians are required only to suggest the patient notify family members, leaving many to choose suicide without the support of loved ones.

Measure #16 strikes at the most vulnerable. Cost containment is a positive and necessary step toward health care reform. However, in this environment Measure #16 is dangerous. Poor, elderly, frail and disabled patients will be the victims if the "choice" to die becomes the "duty" to die.

JEWISH PERSPECTIVE

 

In Jewish law, any form of active euthanasia is strictly prohibited and condemned as plain murder.

The fact that the patient is in unremitting pain and pleads for assistance in ending his life does not change the law. Anyone who kills a dying person is liable to the death penalty as a common murderer.

Active euthanasia, by means of an overt act to hasten death is prohibited, even if the patient is suffering great pain and discomfort, as explained by the following Talmudic and Rabbinic sources:

One who is in a dying condition is regarded as a living person in all respects. (Talmud - Smachot 1:1)
One may not close the eyes of a dying person ... Rabbi Meir would say: "It is to be compared to a sputtering candle which is extinguished as soon a person touches it - so too, whoever closes the eyes of a dying person is compared to have taken the soul." (Talmud - Smachot 1:4)
Even the removal of a pillow when a person is in death throes, thereby hastening death, is forbidden. (Rabbi Moses Isserles, Code of Jewish Law)
It is permitted to administer morphine, etc., to a dying person when necessary to relieve pain, even when though there is a known risk of hastening the [patient's] death, provided that the sole intention of the therapy is to relieve pain and suffering. This is only true if each injection, in and of itself, is not certain to shorten the patient's life, rather the cumulative effect may be life-shortening. However, in a case where even one injection of morphine might cause spontaneous respiration to cease, it is forbidden to administer this drug, even if he is in serious pain, unless the patient will be mechanically respirated. (Rabbi Shlomo Zalman Auerbach, quoted in Nishmat Avraham, Vol. 2, Yoreh Deah 339:4)

Life, be it for 120 years, or a split second, is of infinite value - mystical, and unfathomable. Therefore the quality of life at any one moment does not alter its infinite value.

DISCLAIMER: This module discusses sources for the purpose of education. Any real-life situation must be discussed with a rabbi, well-versed in Jewish law.

Published: Wednesday, January 26, 2000
Hear related audio on this topic.

Like this article? Help us create more. Aish.com exists
only through the support of our readers.

Visitor Comments: 189

(184) alyssa, December 4, 2011 2:24 AM

I am doing a persuasive speech on this topic for college, and I am for it. I fell that if you have the right to determine the outome of a pregnancy you should have the right to choose the determination of your future.

Chana, January 27, 2012 9:00 AM

That's right, you DON'T have the right to determine pregnancy!

And this is exactly one more reason why these acts are so dangeous - "righting" one wrong does not only create that specific harm, but leads the way to righting even more wrongs on that premise. You certainly do NOT have a right to determine the outcome of a pregnancy - abortion has become to prevalent, but what exactly makes it any less murder than the killing of a child outside the womb? In my last pregnancy I was advised to "terminate the pregnancy" due to my having CMV. "Terminate the pregnancy." A cleaner way of saying "kill the baby". All society now needs to do is refer to child murder as "terminating childhood" and that makes it a tad more innocent.. and another step in the direction this world has been taking toward Sedom-like laws. You and I and everyone else have absolutely no right to terminate ANY life - whether in the womb, outside, or on a hospital bed. It is only for God to decide. Terrible stories have been told about terminating seemingly "pointless" lives - every moment of which was in fact offering the victim extra merits in the world to come, now "terminated" by those who supposedly loved him - and the suffering it had brought. Who are we to take the fate of another into our hands????

(183) Annette Campbell, November 10, 2011 6:45 AM

I so AGREE with the "Dr. assisted suicide" as some say.

I just watched my mom die of BLADDER CANCER-that spread to her liver, kidney, lung, rectum. she had her bowels removed and recieved the gasostomy bag in 1994. so for almost 20yrs of her life,it was hell for her and for us. she was in so much pain, she felt she was a burden on us. she didnt want to die at first, but at the end she just wanted to sleep in peace she couldnt handle the pain anymore. For us, i cant even start to explain how awful it was, watching her go through that and do nothing to help. For the first time ever, in my life, there was NOTHING I COULD DO to HELP MY MOM. I felt so useless. for the last 2months of her life this how i felt, and i just wished for her to be at PEACE, i just wished the doctors would help end her pain. It hurt so bad,at the end i didnt even want to go see her because i hated seeing her like that,she was not my mom,she was just an empty shell, just waiting to die. I could see it in her eyes. But i was told "we are not aloud to do that" I was in shock, wondering how its ok to let them suffer like that, knowing they are going to die anyways. why not allow them to make the choice to die sooner than later, easing them from the pain, and discomfort. saving them abit of dignity. saving their family, the pain of watching them die. and let us remember our loved ones the way they were before they got sick. When my mom did finally die, it was so hard to say good bye, but yet i was so happy for her. i knew when she left us, i really did see the look of pure happiness, come over her face. finally got what she wanted. to be PAINFREE. I love u mom, R.I.P always. if a patient is terminaly ill, then I ask that you allow them to make their own choice. and save the family from all the extra pain of watching them die. If this is what the FAMILY ASKs for, then why not. you are giving the patient and loved ones the best gift ever. PEACE.

Anonymous, December 1, 2011 3:04 AM

i definetly agree. and im very sorry for ur loss.ur mom is in a better place. u have my prayers

=), December 7, 2011 6:22 AM

I AGREE!! NOO One should decide but the person going through all of the pain. Who are we to stop them from committing suicide if its their choice and they are the ones suffering..

See All Comments

Submit Your Comment:

  • Display my name?

  • Your email address is kept private. Our editor needs it in case we have a question about your comment.


  • * required field 2000
Submit Comment
stub

About the Author

Sid Bernstein, Esq.

Related Articles:

Sponsors