Reported in the "New York Times," Nov. 22, 1994
and "National Public Radio," June 7, 1996:
A Canadian farmer was convicted of second-degree murder in the death of his disabled daughter, causing debate among Canadians about mercy killing.
Tracy Latimer, age 12, was in near-constant pain since birth due to severe cerebral palsy. She never learned to walk, talk, feed herself, or even sit up. She suffered from daily seizures and frequent vomiting. As her illness progressed her muscles were constantly dislocating her limbs, twisting her spine like a pretzel. Her pelvis was contorted and her hip had been dislodged for a year. Tracey's parents, Robert and Laura Latimer were involved in constant 24-hour care.
With the feeling that he was doing what was right, Mr. Latimer put his daughter into the cab of a pickup truck on the family farm and piped exhaust fumes into it.
He told the police that he was ready to stop the engine if she started crying, but she fell quietly to sleep. "My priority was to put her out of her pain," he said. The Latimers were known as especially loving and attentive parents to their daughter during her brief lifetime.
THE FACTORS IN QUESTION
Was the farmer keeping within the definition of "parental caretaker"?
Assuming self-defense is not involved, should any act of intentionally taking the life of another be regarded as murder, regardless of the motive?
Should the loving, tender care that the farmer gave his daughter over a period of 12 burdensome years be considered?
Does the cost of maintaining this severely disabled girl justify the farmer's action?
Was second degree murder a fair conviction? Should the court have been stricter? More lenient?
Would the case be different if it involved an adult patient who begged for a lethal dose of medicine to take her out of her misery?
Susan (email@example.com) wrote:
A person in the fourth level of Alzheimer's has nearly no episodes of clarity. A person in the last stages of terminal cancer who is living day-to-day in a morphine stupor and nightmare of pain has absolutely no hope in sight. Under these circumstances, I would want the choice.
Apart from capital punishment or self-defense, no one can take the life of another person. Although it seems sensible or right in our human eyes to take the life of a person who is suffering, God, who knows everything, and who sees the end from the beginning, is allowing this suffering for some reason we cannot comprehend. To take someone's life -- or our own -- is to say that we know more than God, and to interfere with His plan.
When people kill others using the mercy excuse, it is because they can't stand the pain of seeing others so afflicted.
When people kill others using the excuse of mercy, it is because the killers cannot stand the pain of seeing that they have so much, and others are so afflicted.
The only time there is no hope of someone's life improving is when they are already dead. Then it is too late. As long as a person is alive, it is impossible to predict what will happen. How will Tracy Latimer's father feel if some cure or effective treatment for cerebral palsy is found -- and she would have been able to live with less suffering (had he not killed her)?
Chia Rivka wrote:
When God has decided that our time on earth is up, why should we prolong the suffering? Legally, a doctor should make our exit as painless as possible so our family need not suffer either.
I cared for my father when he was dying. Often in his pain and agony he would beg for more pain medication. Working closely with the doctor and hospice care, I knew if I gave him that one extra pill or two or whatever, I would in effect, kill him. It was a painful situation watching one's parent die before your eyes.I don't think I could have lived with myself if I had given my father that extra pill. I couldn't go through life knowing that I had murdered someone.
Murder is one of Judaism's three cardinal sins. Biblical references prohibiting murder are numerous:
"Whoever sheds the blood of man, by man shall his blood be shed." (Genesis 9:6)
"Thou shall not murder." (Exodus 20:13)
"If a man shall act intentionally upon his neighbor, to slay him with guile, from My altar shall you take him to die." (Exodus 21:14)
"And a man - if he strikes mortally any human life, shall surely be put to death." (Leviticus 24:17)
"One who kills a person shall be put to death." (Leviticus 24:21)
"Whoever kills any person, the murderer shall be executed through the testimony of witnesses." (Numbers 35:30)
Rabbi Tzvi Meklenberg (19th century Europe) writes in Haktav vi-Hakaballah:
The seemingly repetitive nature of the verse in Genesis 9:5: "From the hand of every man; from the hand of every man who is his brother will I demand the life of man," refers to two types of murder:
1) to the detriment of the victim ("from the hand of every man"), such as for revenge, money, etc.
2) for the benefit of the victim ("from the hand of every man who is his brother"), when he is in great pain and would rather die than live.
The Torah does not differentiate based on motive and reasons.
By referring to the two ways in which one person might take another's life, the Torah does not differentiate based on motive and reasons. Both are equally prohibited.
It is forbidden to cause the dying to die quickly, such as one who is moribund over a long time and cannot die, it is forbidden to move him so that he may die.But if there is something that delays his death, such as a nearby woodchopper making a noise, or there is salt on his tongue, and these prevent his speedy death, one can remove them, for this does not involve any action at all, but rather the removal of the preventive agent. (Rabbi Moses Isserles - Code of Jewish Law YD 339:1)
The jury's decision to convict the Canadian farmer of murder is consistent with Jewish law.
The only situation in which one is allowed to kill another person is when the other is a potential murderer, whereby such killing one might save one's own life or the life of another innocent person.
The Torah defines this potential murderer as a rodef (pursuer), and therefore he forfeits his life. But killing someone who is not a threat to the life of another is ... murder.
DISCLAIMER: This module discusses sources for the purpose of education. Any real-life situation must be discussed with a rabbi, well-versed in Jewish law.