click here to jump to start of article
Join Our Newsletter

Join 400,000 Aish subscribers
Get Email Updates




What Happened to the Jews of Arabia?

What Happened to the Jews of Arabia?

A story that should make every Jew shudder.

by

Did you know that Saudi Arabia once hosted a thriving Jewish community? For almost a thousand years (three times longer than the Jews have been in America), Jews lived in the oases of Teyma, Khaybar, and Yathrib (later known as Medina), in the northern Arabian Peninsula. According to Dr. Hagai Mazuz, an Orientalist specializing in Arabic language, Islam, and Islamic culture, “The Jewish community of northern Arabia was one of the largest ancient Jewish communities in the history of the Jewish people.”1

They were powerful and wealthy. They were respected by the local Arabian tribes for their religion, culture, erudition, and literacy. They built castles on mountaintops and developed productive plantations. They had military prowess, horses, and advanced weaponry. And they were almost totally annihilated in the short span of a few years.

Their story should make every Jew shudder.

The Jews of Medina were divided into three groups: The Banu Qaynuqa were blacksmiths, weapon wrights, and goldsmiths. The Banu Nadir had date plantations. The Banu QurayUa were wine merchants. These groups often quarreled. Sometimes the hostility among them broke out into actual fighting.

When Mohammed fled from Mecca in 622, he went to Medina. At first, he entered into an alliance with the Jews. He studied in their study halls and adopted many of their customs into his incipient religion (e.g. not eating pork). But when, after two years, Mohammed could not convince the Jews to accept him as a prophet and convert to his religion, his attitude turned toward open hostility. He instructed his friends to murder and decapitate Ka’b Ibn al-Ashraf, a renowned Jewish poet and chief of the Banu Nadir (date farmers tribe), and ordered his followers, “Kill every Jew you can.” 2

Mohammed then besieged the Banu Qaynuqa (blacksmith tribe), knowing that the other two Jewish tribes would not come to their aid. Although the Banu Qaynuqa were proficient warriors, the lack of food and water due to the siege weakened them to the point of surrender.

Stop the story here! If I were reading a Hollywood screenplay that developed like this, I would reject it as unrealistic and absurd. Here the protagonist, Mohammed, has openly declared his intention to kill every Jew. And he has started his killing campaign with the grisly beheading of the head of the date famers tribe.

Is Jewish unity such a bitter pill that Jews would rather swallow cyanide?

Mohammed’s forces at that point were weaker than the combined Jewish forces would have been. Why didn’t the date farmers and the wine merchants unite to break the siege and save the blacksmiths? How could they sit on their hands and let their brethren perish? Even if they hated their fellow Jews, surely they should have realized that uniting in order to eradicate the murderous Mohammed’s forces would be in their long-term self-interest. And these are supposed to be smart Jews? With a sneer, I would toss this screenplay into the wastebasket.

History, however, is less sensible than Hollywood. The other two Jewish tribes did nothing to save the Jewish blacksmiths. After the surrender, Mohammed wanted to slaughter the vanquished tribe, but his ally Abdullah Ibn Ubayyy prevented the massacre, and instead they were exiled to Edri (now in Jordan).

Mohammed confiscated their considerable assets. Strengthened by captured Jewish wealth, one year later Mohammed turned his attention to the next Jewish tribe, the date growers. To ensure that the tribe of the wine merchants would not come to the rescue of their fellow Jews, Mohammed made an alliance with the wine merchants.

This is crazy! The reviewer in me, who has rejected many a far-fetched plot, cannot abide this one. The Jewish wine merchants must have drunk their own stock and become totally plastered to ally themselves with a sworn enemy of the Jews against their own people. Is Jewish unity such a bitter pill that Jews would rather swallow cyanide?

Related Article: On the Same Team

Mohammed’s forces laid siege to the strongholds of the Jewish date farmers in 625. Like the previous Jewish tribe, they succumbed to the siege. Again Abdullah Ibn Ubayyy intervened, and instead of slaughtering the vanquished Jews, Mohammed exiled them to the city of Khaybar, which, according to Muslim tradition, was inhabited by descendants of the Jewish priestly tribe.

Three years later Mohammed conquered Khaybar, the wealthiest city in northern Arabia. Because the Muslims did not know agriculture, Mohammed permitted most of the Jews to live as dhimmis, officially second-class citizens who had to pay exorbitant taxes. Eventually the second Caliph banished the Jews of Khaybar, in obedience to Mohammed’s policy that permitted no religion other than Islam to be practiced in Arabia.

Back in Medina, the wine merchant tribe had only two years to relish their position as the sole surviving Jews. Then, in 627, Mohammed, with 3,000 soldiers, laid siege to their fortress. The Jewish tribe had only 450 trained warriors. Because Abdullah Ibn Ubayyy had died a few months before, the Jews knew that no one would intercede on their behalf. The leader of the besieged Jews proposed that they either convert to Islam or, similar to Masada, kill their own women and children to prevent their being ravished and enslaved, and then fight the Muslims to the death. The Jews rejected both options and offered to surrender and leave Medina.

Mohammed rejected their offer. The vanquished wine merchants tribe, who had twice refused to help the other besieged Jewish tribes, suffered the worst fate. The children were sold as slaves; the women were given to the victorious soldiers “for the Muslims to use,” and the men (except for three who agreed to convert to Islam) were decapitated in the marketplace. According to Muslim tradition, the blood of the decapitated Jews flooded the marketplace of Medina.

A large, powerful, affluent Jewish community was destroyed in just three years. Was it destroyed by Mohammed’s forces or was it destroyed by its own divisiveness?

Our sages say that the Holy Temple was not destroyed by the superiority of the Roman forces. It was destroyed by sinat chinam, senseless hatred among Jews.

“Those who do not learn from history are condemned to repeat it.” Apparently the Jews of Arabia did not learn from our tragic history.

How many times will we have to play this re-run?


  1. “Massacre in Medina,” Segula Magazine, issue 3.
  2.  Ibid. Dr. Mazuz, who is a Senior Advisor to the Gatestone Institute, based his article, “Massacred in Medina” on exclusively Muslim sources.

For Sara Yoheved Rigler's acclaimed, free Introductory Marriage Workshop for women, click here.

Published: July 18, 2012


Give Tzedakah! Help Aish.com create inspiring
articles, videos and blogs featuring timeless Jewish wisdom.

Visitor Comments: 54

(41) Anonymous, July 17, 2013 4:37 AM

Divisiveness today

Divisiveness today is in the form of the left leaning Jews voting for left leaning politicians that are not at all interested in Jewish causes or Israel. How can we reach these people? Although the religious are ready to reach them, they have no interest in reaching the religious. How true is: Am Yisroel B'li Torah, hee k'guf b'li neshama. Moshiach now!

(40) Sarahmint, January 12, 2013 7:46 PM

Thats a good story. Not to mention the price to pay for being a coward a.k.a. anti-war activist.

(39) Paul, December 20, 2012 9:20 AM

scary

Oh Man that was sickening to read. I always feel so disturbed when I read history. Its not stories it actually happened to a whole tribe. I can't even imagine the horror of knowing you lost your kids, being sold, wife's handed around. In Australia or Asia I have never heard any of these accounts of History I had no idea there was such severe persecution every where. Israel should tell some of these stories in the west, people legitimately think Israel is just crazy paranoid, I Did. After studying up on all this I actually think Israel has been pretty restrained. I worry about the most pathetic things in my day I would be a wreck if I lived in Israel. What makes this so scary is you know Saudi Arabians to this day are no different then then they were in 622. I highly doubt there is another Abdullah Ibn Ubayyy.

(38) Ari Rondel, November 17, 2012 4:14 PM

History will repeat itself.

As a lapsed Jew I am affraid that history will repeat itself. Palastinians had their land stolen by the British and Americans to give to the Jews because of what happend in WWII. They done this because they had guilt!! they new what was happening in Germany but chose do to nothing, no sorry, the British and the USA did do something, they refused entry to the Jews to their respective countries. This was after Hitler told them to take the Jews or they would perish. All the British and Americans have done for the Jews, and that ain't much, all they have done, is put them in an impossible position because of the 'stealing' more and more land for illegal settlements, because if you are a Jew from Timbucktoo or any where else you can live in Israel, and to live in Israel you have to push the Palestinians further and further from their own land.

(37) mgoldberg, August 4, 2012 3:57 PM

The author is incorrect

The author is incorrect, and tragically wrong. It was not sinat china that authored that genocide and exile in arabla. The arabs, his own tribe, had no idea as to how sociopathic his ideas were and to what length he would go to conquer and obtain. Nor did the jews.Just as today- such as the author did not have the ability to call evil evil and say... Islam was and is evil, mohammed was and did evil and the jews then couldn't and the jews now can't. Mrs. Rigler can't. All she can say is to blame the jews for disunity. Which is tragically erroneous. All we have to do is examine Mohammed's stated Qu'ran, his actions, his history and say those words. But we are so miserably correct we never can say it. So we die. It wasn't Sinat Chinam- it was blindness.

See All Comments

Submit Your Comment:

  • Display my name?

  • Your email address is kept private. Our editor needs it in case we have a question about your comment.


  • * required field 2000
Submit Comment
stub
Sign up today!