"Where was God in those days?" asked the pope. Here's a possible answer.

by Jeff Jacoby

"Where was God in those days?" asked Pope Benedict XVI as he stood in Auschwitz. "Why was he silent? How could he permit this endless slaughter, this triumph of evil?"

It is the inevitable question in Auschwitz, that vast factory of death where the Nazis tortured, starved, shot, and gassed to death as many as a million and a half innocent human beings, most of them Jews. "In a place like this, words fail," Benedict said. "In the end, there can be only a dread silence, a silence which itself is a heartfelt cry to God: Why, Lord, did you remain silent?"

News reports emphasized the pope's question. Every story noted that the man who voiced it was, as he put it, "a son of the German people." No one missed the intense historical significance of a German pope, on a pilgrimage to Poland, beseeching God for answers at the slaughterhouse where just 60 years ago Germans broke every record for shedding Jewish blood.

And yet some commentators accused Benedict of skirting the issue of anti-Semitism. The national director of the Anti-Defamation League said that the pope had "uttered not one word about anti-Semitism; not one explicit acknowledgment of Jewish lives vanquished simply because they were Jews." The National Catholic Register likewise reported that he "did not make any reference to modern anti-Semitism."

In truth, the pope not only acknowledged the reality of Jew-hatred, he explained the pathology that underlies it. Anti-Semites are driven by hostility not just toward Jews, he said, but toward the message of God-based ethics they first brought to the world.

"Deep down, those vicious criminals" -- he was speaking of Hitler and his followers -- "by wiping out this people, wanted to kill the God who called Abraham, who spoke on Sinai and laid down principles to serve as a guide for mankind, principles that are eternally valid. If this people, by its very existence, was a witness to the God who spoke to humanity and took us to himself, then that God finally had to die and power had to belong to man alone -- to those men, who thought that by force they had made themselves masters of the world."

Hitler knew that his will to power could triumph only if he first destroyed Judeo-Christian values.

The Nazis' ultimate goal, Benedict argued, was to rip out Christian morality by its Jewish roots, replacing it with "a faith of their own invention: faith in the rule of man, the rule of the powerful." Hitler knew that his will to power could triumph only if he first destroyed Judeo-Christian values. In the Thousand-Year Reich, God and his moral code would be wiped out. Man, unencumbered by conscience, would reign in his place. It is the oldest of temptations, and Auschwitz is what it leads to.

"Where was God in those days?" asked the pope. How could a just and loving Creator have allowed trainload after trainload of human beings to be murdered at Auschwitz? But why ask such a question only in Auschwitz? Where, after all, was God in the Gulag? Where was God when the Khmer Rouge slaughtered 1.7 million Cambodians? Where was God during the Armenian holocaust? Where was God in Rwanda? Where is God in Darfur?

For that matter, where is God when even one innocent victim is being murdered or raped or abused?

The answer, though the pope didn't say so clearly, is that a world in which God always intervened to prevent cruelty and violence would be a world without freedom -- and life without freedom would be meaningless. God endows human beings with the power to choose between good and evil. Some choose to help their neighbor; others choose to hurt him. There were those in Nazi Europe who herded Jews into gas chambers. And there were those who risked their lives to hide Jews from the Gestapo.

The God "who spoke on Sinai" was not addressing himself to angels or robots who could do no wrong even if they wanted to. He was speaking to real people with real choices to make, and real consequences that flow from those choices. Auschwitz wasn't God's fault. He didn't build the place. And only by changing those who did build it from free moral agents into puppets could he have stopped them from committing their horrific crimes.

It was not God who failed during the Holocaust or in the Gulag, or on 9/11, or in Bosnia. It is not God who fails when human beings do barbaric things to other human beings. Auschwitz is not what happens when the God who says "Thou shalt not murder" and "Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself" is silent. It is what happens when men and women refuse to listen.

Published: Monday, June 5, 2006
Hear related audio on this topic.

Like this article? Help us create more. Aish.com exists
only through the support of our readers.

Visitor Comments: 125

(125) Anonymous, October 26, 2011 9:17 PM

on why did God not intervene

I agree with the Rabbi's wise words-Our God the creator of the universe declared to man to take care of the world he created-the laws he gave us are laws not to be ignorantly broken- but to be cherished and kept-thou shalt not kill-- and love thy neighbor means just THAT-Gods judges us and will.

(124) Gavriel, May 2, 2011 9:00 PM

Tribunal against HaShem

It was just after the liberation. The survivors had been physically taken care of by the liberators and they were waiting to be transported. There were some great minds of Talmudic Scholars and of others, who thirsted for the mental and spiritual activities of which they now could again occupy themselves with. The need for the day to day survival had been accomplished. So, they asked themselves if they, Am Yisroel, were still HaShem's Chosen People. And if they were, why had HaShem let them suffer all these horrible atrocities? How about the Covenant? This legally binding formal agreement - had HaShem (Blessed be He!) kept to His part of the Agreement? And above all, if He had failed to do so, were they still obliged to obey the Ten Words? Now, of course they had to be fair! They had to let a court decide if HaShem had failed to keep the Covenant - in principal, had He failed to keep them. So they decided to have a Tribunal of the Highest Order,The question of "in absence of the accused" turned up. It was countered with, "When is HaShem ever absent?" A lot more detail were discussed and decided upon for days. Finally, they all agreed to have the Tribunal the next day. Hither and wither went the tide of the Court - until finally, way late in the day, HaShem was, by Decree of this High Tribunal, found guilty and the Ten Words, the Covenant was now declared obsolete. Then, the man they had chosen as their shames, the "Server of the Religious Community", stood up and said, "Gentlemen, it is becoming evening; time to daavern." Everybody stood up - and prayed!

(123) Shashi Ishai, May 2, 2011 12:34 PM

The stuggle to accept the idea that Hashem gives us freedom rather than destiny

Through childhood and ongoing adulthood, I have struggled with the dichotomy of free choice and destiny. I pray everyday (the Amidah), and when I get to points which proclaim G-d as a just, rightous King who protects us and redeems us, I still see a famous photo of a little boy w cap and star running from the ghetto...The Pope's questions can be mirrored in many peoples' minds. His answers leave me uncomfortable....can we change destiny? If G-d knows everything, how can we make choices??? Is Hashem's plan incomprehensible to us for we have limited vision???

(122) Mordechai, May 1, 2011 8:45 PM

Hashem Yisborach

"My thoughts are not your thoughts, nor are My ways your ways (Yeshaya)." All of us here would do well to remember a few very important things. First and foremost, Hashem (G-d) is an all-loving, all-knowing, all-powerful, and unlimited Being. He is above all things finite and only He truly knows the reasons behind His actions in reference to His universe and His creations. We are limited, physical, and finite beings who can only see this world through our 5 senses and think about it through the limited faculties of our finite perspective. We cannot understand why 6 million people, righteous and wicked alike, had to die, any more than we can understand when a baby dies shortly after his bris mila. The only thing we know for sure is that He is running the show, and regardless of how bad it looks and feels, it is all ultimately for the good, which only He can know through His inifinite wisdom. Secondly, and I apologize in advance if this upsets anyone, but we humans have a bad habit of forgetting that we are not our bodies and that we do not end after our time here on earth. We are eternal, created in the image of the Master of the Universe, and as sad, awful, and scary as death seems, be it our own or our loved ones, we must remember that it is not the end, but the beginning of an eternity of bliss and ultimate connection with our source and the Source of all. I would never try and minimize the suffering of all those involved in the Holocaust, I myself never met many of my own family members because of Hitler (yemach sh'mo), but if we are to ask such large questions as these and throw out accusations against Hashem (most of which, I am sorry to say, are not intellectual arguments but emotional responses to grief or loss), we must remember the basics.

(121) Ricardo Torrence, May 1, 2011 4:31 PM

Everything is ok.

There are many troubles, accidents, death, illness, suffering and hatred as well as prosperity, new vibrant life, health, joy and love. This is our perspective. We tend to qualify things following a very personal principle: If it hurts me it's bad, if it gives me pleasure it's good. Now, G-d's perspective - seems to me - is quite different to ours. May we be humbly enough to acknowledge this and accept our lot. After we do this we will see that everything is ok.

See All Comments

Submit Your Comment:

  • Display my name?

  • Your email address is kept private. Our editor needs it in case we have a question about your comment.


  • * required field 2000
Submit Comment
stub

About the Author

Jeff Jacoby

Jeff Jacoby is a columnist for The Boston Globe. To see a month's worth of his recent columns, please visit Boston Globe

Related Articles:

Sponsors