Israeli Knesset Removes Right to 3rd Opinion
click here to jump to start of article
Join Our Newsletter

Get latest articles and videos with Jewish inspiration and insights​




Israeli Knesset Removes Right to 3rd Opinion

Israeli Knesset Removes Right to 3rd Opinion

Government to close second synagogue on Island with only one castaway.

by Mem Morgenstern

In a controversial move, the Israeli Parliament officially withdrew the Jewish right to hold an extra opinion. The old Jewish saying that with two Jews comes three opinions has been a mainstay right in the Jewish democracy, often causing flip flopping in the public opinion polls. Exit polls are notoriously unreliable in Israel as citizens are known to purposely lie about who they voted for. Rather than see this as false testimony, a prohibition listed in the Ten Commandments, Israelis long hold this as natural expression of multiple opinions and the right to prove everyone wrong no matter whom they are what they stand for.

According to Israeli human rights organization, this is a severe blow to Israeli's freedom of expression. "The Knesset is suddenly telling Israeli citizens what to think and how many opinions it can have?" said Yaron Rubin, of Tel Aviv. "Next the government will be closing down the second synagogue on the desert island with the one castaway, you know, the one he doesn't use. This is inconceivable!" There are talks of public protests in Tel Aviv and Jerusalem, but specifics are still being discussed.

Already the Jerusalem Rabbinate is moving fast to restrict the limits of the legislation. An advisor to the Chief Rabbi has spoken off the record to the fact that in Jerusalem, the eternal undivided capital of the Jewish people, a Jew should always be permitted to hold as many conflicting ideas and opinions as possible even if those opinions are both correct and incorrect at the very same time.

One of the supporters of the bill was Dr. Avraham Berkowitz, a Hebrew University political science professor who did extensive research into the conflicting political thoughts of Jews. "I did a double blind study in the Mahne Yehuda [outdoor shopping] Market in Jerusalem," stated Dr. Berkowitz. "Two separate statisticians interviewed the exact same people asking their personal preference: falafel or shwarma. The first time, the group scored 47% in favor of shwarma, 35% falafel, while 18% responded cheese toast. However, when the second statistician asked the very same people the same question on the same day the results varied dramatically: 51% falafel, 22% shwarma, and 27% preferred some sort of falafel shwarma hybrid called a ‘shwalafel.'"

"27% preferred some sort of falafel shwarma hybrid called a ‘shwalafel.'"

Some see the new law as a turning point that could have significant implications on the Jewish High Holy Days. According to tradition, if a Jew repents, through prayer and charity, one can change the divine decree that is written and sealed against them on Yom Kippur. While scholars note that the Israeli Knesset has no legal jurisdiction on the heavenly court, some are worried that simple Jews, having heard of the new legal policy, may be discouraged from changing their own opinions about themselves and won't fully repent.

Despite the passage of the law this week, there is still one last hurdle to pass before the extra opinion is officially rescinded. A representative of the Supreme Court of Israel said that the high court will weigh in on the matter, but commented that the decision will almost certainly not be unanimous.

Published: September 8, 2007


Give Tzedakah! Help Aish.com create inspiring
articles, videos and blogs featuring timeless Jewish wisdom.

Visitor Comments: 7

(7) Janet, June 13, 2010 9:05 PM

ATT: Joey A.

If you think it's ridiculous, then what are you doing reading this section?

(6) Anonymous, September 15, 2007 9:37 AM

An interesting article

Dear Mr Morgenstern
I thought many of my fellow Indians had
this strange behaviour.sincerely
menon

(5) fred, September 11, 2007 12:48 PM

Slippery Slope

Can it be long before the second opinion follows? And let me tell you, the first opinion is ridiculous enough to be dangerous.

(4) Joey A., September 11, 2007 9:56 AM

I disagree with Joey A.; I found this article funny. God bless!

(3) Joey A., September 11, 2007 9:49 AM

This article was ridiculous and pointless.

See All Comments

Submit Your Comment:

  • Display my name?

  • Your email address is kept private. Our editor needs it in case we have a question about your comment.


  • * required field 2000
Submit Comment
stub