| |||
|
|
This week, while at least a quarter-million Israelis gathered outside the Old City walls in support of Jerusalem, CNN completely downplayed the event -- an act that media watchdogs are calling CNN's worst violation of objectivity in recent memory. This critique refers both to CNN's earlier and later report on the rally: http://www.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/meast/01/08/mideast.02/index.html http://www.cnn.com/2001/WORLD/meast/01/08/mideast.04/index.html This critique will examine five points:
1) HOW MANY PEOPLE ATTENDED THE RALLY?
In the article headline, CNN quantifies the number of attendees:
CNN's opening paragraph repeats the same assertion:
A later CNN article updated the reference to "tens of thousands." But how many people does this actually refer to? 30,000? 40,000? Across-the-board consensus from European, American, and Israeli media estimate at least one-quarter-million:
We ask: Why does CNN stand isolated amongst world media in minimizing the outpouring of Jewish support for Jerusalem? 2) COVERAGE OF THE ACTUAL EVENT It would be expected that the largest political gathering in Jerusalem in the last 1900 years --- and one which addresses the most primary world issue of the day -- would merit top media coverage. Indeed, sources like the New York Times, LA Times, London Times, Washington Post, and most every other news organization covered the rally as an independent story. The early edition of CNN devoted a paltry 5 sentences to the event. In the later edition, when many more details of the rally were available, the rally was not mentioned in the headline at all -- and CNN did not give an account of the rally until paragraph #14. Is not a rally of over 250,000 people headline-worthy? The later CNN article, published after all the speeches had been made, did not offer one quote from any of the quarter-million attendees. The lone CNN quote comes from Muslim Waqf Adnan Husseini, who called the rally "provocative." Were no Jews available for comment?! 3) HISTORICAL CONTEXT OF JERUSALEM CNN gravely diminishes the Jewish connection to Jerusalem and the Temple Mount. There is no mention of Jerusalem as the capital of the Jewish people for over 3,000 years -- 1,500 years before Islam ever existed. Nor does CNN make any mention of the Temple Mount as the site of Judaism's two Holy Temples. CNN's description:
Right, CNN. Third-holiest to Moslems -- even though over the last 1,500 years, Jerusalem has never been the religious or national capital of any Arab or Moslem entity. Never. But 3,000 years as the Jewish capital and Judaism's single holiest site? CNN omits any reference. Further, in a shocking reference, CNN says the site of the rally was:
"Jaffa Gate" is the standard reference in any encyclopedia, university textbook, diplomatic document, media style guide, or any other acceptable Western source. So why does CNN go out of it's way - particularly in the context of reporting a Jewish rally -- to drudge up Bab al-Khalil, an obscure Arabic reference to this geographic site? Shall we also expect CNN to refer to Manhattan as Man-a-hat-ta, or "island of hills," the name given by the Algonquian Indians? 4) DEMOGRAPHIC COMPOSITION OF ATTENDEES The Jerusalem rally was a non-partisan show of solidarity from Jews around the world and across the political spectrum. Many Jews flew in from the diaspora to attend, and busloads of Jews came from 100 towns and villages throughout the country. The event was specifically planned to be non-political. No politicians or members of Israeli parliament (other than the mayor of Jerusalem) were allowed to deliver speeches. The Jerusalem Post reports:
So how does CNN spin it? The only reference to the demographic character of the attendees is to paraphrase unnamed Barak supporters that:
CNN advances a myth that the Israeli public is divided on the issue of Jerusalem. In truth, even Barak continues to repeat his strong opposition to relinquishing sovereignty over Old City sites. Time magazine, in a report issued by bureau chief Matt Rees, clarifies the bi-partisan nature of support for a united Jerusalem:
5) NATURE OF THE RALLY: PEACEFUL OR PROVOCATIVE? At the Jerusalem rally, people were quiet and orderly, listening to speakers and musicians. Some paraded with Israeli flags and signs, while most just stood still. Along the wall of the Old City itself, hundreds of young students sat on the grass around large candles, reading Psalms and praying. From time to time, dancing broke out in the streets. That's right, dancing. Given the violent nature of Palestinian rallies in recent months, was it not newsworthy that there was no violence at the Jewish rally? That none of the speakers spewed the hate-filled rhetoric commonly heard at other gatherings? That of the thousands of Jews gathered, not a single rock or firebomb was thrown at passing Arabs? CNN, of course, has only its lone quote from Muslim Waqf Adnan Husseini, calling the rally "provocative." The Wall Street Journal Europe writes beautifully:
In the end, the rally was a huge success. It reminded all Jews -- and told the world -- that Jerusalem was, is and always will be the heart of the Jewish people. With or without CNN.
If you would like to receive "Israel Update" or other features via e-mail, please enter your email address here:
Like what you read? As a non-profit organization, Aish.com relies on support from readers like you to enable us to provide inspiring and relevant articles. Click here to support Aish.com.
|
|
If you would like to receive "Israel Update" or other features via e-mail, please enter your email address here:
|