click here to jump to start of article
  • Torah Reading: Naso
Join Our Newsletter

Get latest articles and videos with Jewish inspiration and insights​

The Torah’s PIN Number

The Torah’s PIN Number

Identifying information that only the author knows.


How does an ATM work? You insert your card and enter your PIN. The machine gives you money. It won’t give you money if the PIN is wrong. PIN stands for Personal Identification Number. You know it. Nobody else does.

Online security is similar. You need a password to check your email, to pay your bills, or to join a social networking site. In addition, most online services ask specific security questions like, “What is your mother’s maiden name?” “What was the name of your first pet?” “What was the name of your high school mascot?” “What was the make of your first car?” You know this information. Nobody else does.

Does the Torah have a PIN?

Look at the kosher laws. The kosher laws contain information that only the author could know. Assuming the author was God.

The kosher laws are complex. They apply to everything you eat including meat, plants, fruits, vegetables, bugs, and processed foods.

Take meat for example. How do the kosher laws apply to meat?

Most meat is not kosher. That is because most animals are not kosher. A kosher animal has two distinguishing characteristics: it has split hooves and it chews its cud. It is rare that an animal has both features.

If an animal has a paw, it is not kosher.

What are split hooves? Look at the animal’s foot. Does it have a paw or a hoof? If it has a paw, it is not kosher. If it has a hoof, is the hoof a big block – like a horse? Or is it split in two – like a cow (it looks like two big, hard toes)? If it is split, that is one distinguishing characteristic.

The other is cud chewing. A kosher animal has multiple stomachs. It eats grass or grain, chews it, swallows it, brings it back to its mouth to chew again, and then swallows into a different stomach. An animal that does this is a ruminant. (The process is called rumination.)

Kosher animals have split hooves and chew their cud. They must have both features. One isn’t enough.

But if the animal has both, it is kosher. No more information is necessary. Split hooves and rumination are the only things to look for. Nothing else.

Are cows kosher? Yes, they have split hooves and chew their cud. Are lions kosher? No, they don’t have split hooves or chew their cud.

Elephants, bears, snakes, monkeys, and mice are not kosher – they don’t have split hooves or chew their cud. Cows, deer, goats, and sheep are kosher – they have split hooves and chew their cud.

How about camels? No. They chew their cud but they don’t have split hooves.

How about pigs? No. The have spilt hooves but don’t chew their cud.


Out on a Limb

Look at an animal. Look at its feet. Look at the goo in its mouth. If the foot is split and the mouth is pasty, bon appétit. The Torah mentioned these two signs. And that is all it needed to say. It taught a simple rule to determine if an animal is kosher or not. And that is what makes these verses in the Book of Leviticus 11:4-8 so unusual:

    Among the cud-chewing, hoofed animals, these are the ones you may not eat: The camel shall be unclean to you although it brings up its cud, since it does not have a split hoof. The shafan shall be unclean to you although it brings up its cud, since it does not have a split hoof. The arneves shall be unclean to you although it brings up its cud, since it does not have a split hoof. The pig shall be unclean to you although it has a split hoof, since it does not chew its cud. Do not eat the flesh of these animals.

Why does the Torah list these four animals? True, they are exceptions to the rule – each animal has one sign but not the other. But listing exceptions is unnecessary. The rule is already clear: both signs, kosher; one sign or no signs, not kosher. Simple.

And if you look carefully at the Hebrew grammar, it makes it clear that these four animals are the only exceptions. The camel, shafan, and arneves are the only animals that ruminate but don’t have split hooves. The pig is the only animal that has split hooves but doesn’t ruminate.

That is a gutsy thing to say. What happens if you discover another animal with only one sign? Oops.

Why take the risk? Listing the exceptions is risky and unnecessary. The kosher laws are clear without the extra information. Think about it. People discover new animals all the time. People discovered new animals in the ancient world, too.

The ancient Egyptians had zoos. They had animals from all over Africa. They even had bears. The Jews were slaves in Egypt 3,300 years ago. It isn’t farfetched to think that some Jewish slaves visited the zoos of their masters.

Or imagine a different scenario. Maybe a rich Egyptian master took his Jewish slave with him on vacation. If he vacationed up the Nile in Sudan or Ethiopia – and wandered into the wilderness – the master and his slave saw new creatures they never saw before. Exotic beasts live in distant lands.

These are possibilities. You can probably think of a few more. And if an ex-slave helped write the Torah, he would not state: “Four animals have one kosher sign, but not both. There are no other exceptions.” He knows that someone could discover another animal. Why gamble?

The Only Exception

But is it a gamble if you know that you’re right?

The Torah was written 3,300 years ago. Thousands of new animals have been discovered. And none of the new animals are a fifth exception. Pigs are still the only non-ruminating animals with split hooves. Camels, shafans, and arneveses, are still the only ruminating animals without split hooves.

Look at this quote from the Talmud (Chulin 60b):

    Was Moses a hunter or an archer? This is to answer those who say that the Torah isn’t from heaven.

Moses was not familiar with every type of animal in the world. But God was. It was risky for Moses to list only four possible exceptions. It wasn’t risky for God.

But you probably have a question: What is a shafan and what is an arneves? Camel and pig are familiar. Shafan and arneves are not. The shafan and arneves are most likely both extinct species. How convenient.

Pigs are the only animal with spilt hooves but don’t chew their cud.

If someone discovers an animal that ruminates but doesn’t have split hooves, just claim it is a shafan or arneves. Maybe the author inserted a fudge factor into the text. He covered all his bases.

But what about the pig? The pig is the only animal listed that has split hooves but doesn’t ruminate. The Torah doesn’t include an extinct animal to cover in case a new animal with split hooves that doesn’t ruminate is discovered. And scientists have classified thousands of animals since the Torah was written. Pigs are still the only animals that have spilt hooves but don’t chew their cud. Incredible.

Moses wasn’t a zoologist. He didn’t know the Torah’s PIN number. But the author did. Who do you think he was?

From the book, Discover This – based on the Aish HaTorah Discovery Seminar

NOTE: The Torah clearly states that the shafan and arneves are cud-chewing animals. According to Torah sources, cud-chewing is distinguished by five criteria:

  • The animal regurgitates nearly all its food
  • The food is regurgitated as a bolus (soft ball)
  • The animal chews this bolus
  • The animal chews the bolus using a lateral motion
  • This process is done for imperative nutritional purposes

A number of translators have suggested translations for shafan and arneves; however, none of their suggestions fit these five criteria. Some have suggested that caecotrophy (when an animal re-ingests soft pellets of semi-digested matter taken directly from the anus) could be considered cud-chewing. Based on the criteria listed above, caecotrophy clearly doesn’t fit the bill. Based on these factors, it is best to consider the shafan and arneves likely extinct. See Michael Allaby, A Dictionary of Zoology, and for a definition of caecotrophy.

October 10, 2010

Give Tzedakah! Help create inspiring
articles, videos and blogs featuring timeless Jewish wisdom.
The opinions expressed in the comment section are the personal views of the commenters. Comments are moderated, so please keep it civil.

Visitor Comments: 16

(9) Samuel Acheampong, January 11, 2012 4:46 PM

the grasscutter chews the cud, but has no hooves.

I think I know another animal also. It is the grasscutter. It ruminates but does not have the split hooves. Anyway, I am not an expert in this area.Thanks.

Anonymous, December 13, 2012 1:52 AM

Grasscutters aren't ruminates

Food Habits: T. swinderianus are herbivores and their natural diet is mainly grasses and cane. Sometimes they also eat bark, fallen fruits, nuts and many different kinds of cultivated crops. Some of the cultivated crop fields that T. swinderianus invade are sugar cane, maize, millet, cassava, roundnuts, sweet potatoes, and pumpkins (Fitzinger, 1997). Great Cane Rats’ favorite food is elephant grass and sweet potatoes (National Research Council, 1991). They prefer plants with lots of moisture and soluble carbohydrates (Agbelusi, 1997).[1] T. swinderianus cut the grasses and other foods with their incisors, producing a chattering sound that is relatively loud and very distinguishable (Mills, 1997).[1] It has been described as a pseudo-ruminant [2] [1] [2]

(8) Isaac, March 31, 2011 4:31 PM

what about proboscis monkeys?

Proboscis monkeys have been proven to chew their cud, yet they do not have a split hoof. Are these creatures indeed the shafran or arneveth that Moses referred to?

Yaakov, December 13, 2012 1:18 AM

My answer to Isaacs question from Proboscis

I presume you got this from Slifkin. I sent him a detailed answer, I don't know if he will sensor it though, so I'll write the answer here as well: This argument is based on a semantical fallacy. Just because it does ruminate, doesn't make it a ruminant. This is obvious, just because I do "x", doesn't make me a "x"er. Compared to other ruminants, probiscus does not ruminate much at all, & it's relatively rare occurrence would be more similar to an eating disorder(which, contrary to what you wrote is not a new thing[1]), than a standard part of it's eating habits: To compare: During an average 24hr period they found that sheep fed chopped forage twice a day at 15% excess spent 6hours eating, 9 hours ruminating, & 9 hours idle. Although both numbers of feeding per day & forage quality varied , somewhat similar rumination times were observed in cattle (Welch & Smith1970, Welch et al. 1970. Gordon (1968) estimates that ruminants spend about one third of their time ruminating.[2] A cow should ruminate for seven to ten hours per day, ruminating 40 to 70 times on a cud.[3] Dairy cows ruminate 450 - 500 times per day.[4] Based on these #s the probiscus can hardly be called a ruminant. The comparison to the hare is a non sequitur. The point is that it doesn't do it often/consistently enough to be classified as a ruminant. Hares do what they do on a regular consistent daily basis, twice a day. No comparison. Sources don't fit so I'll post it in the next comment.

Anonymous, December 13, 2012 1:20 AM

Sources to previous post:

Here are the sources for the previous post: [1] [2] monkey (Nasalis larvatus) on the island of Borneo apparently chews its cud&ots=Zd9gwVQAWf&sig=8UuEHwG34uGJ2N3ExMBnewFkslg#v=onepage&q=cud&f=false [3] [4]

See All Comments

Submit Your Comment:

  • Display my name?

  • Your email address is kept private. Our editor needs it in case we have a question about your comment.

  • * required field 2000
Submit Comment