15. One, Not Two
click here to jump to start of article
Join Our Newsletter

Get latest articles and videos with Jewish inspiration and insights​




15. One, Not Two

15. One, Not Two

It is impossible for there to exist more than one G-d.

by

One Infinite1:1:6
Section 1: Fundamentals of Existence
Chapter 1: The Creator
Point 6

Among the things that it is also necessary to know is that G-d must be absolutely one.

It is impossible that there exist more than one being whose existence in intrinsically imperative. Only one Being can possibly exist with this necessarily perfect Essence, and therefore the only reason that other things have the possibility of existence is that G-d wills them to exist. All other things therefore depend on Him, and do not have intrinsic existence.

The final point that the Ramchal wants us to understand about G-d is that He is one, and this logically must be so. Here, we're not talking about the "oneness" that we described earlier, i.e. that G-d is not composed of parts or elements. Here the idea is that there cannot be two G-ds. It is logically impossible for there to be two infinite beings. How do we know that this is so?

Let's try for a moment to entertain the notion of two infinite beings – two beings where each is defined as infinite, unlimited, formless, independent and perfect. Let's call them G-d-1 and G-d-2. If they're both perfect, it seems self-evident that G-d-1 can't have anything that G-d-2 doesn't have. Otherwise G-d-2 would be lacking and therefore not perfect and unlimited.

So the question becomes – what makes them "two"? How can we distinguish between them? Even if we were to talk about two identical tennis balls, on a fundamental level, they're not identical at all. They each have the same shape, but one is made out of a bunch of molecules and the second is made out of an entirely different bunch of molecules. One is on the left side of the table, and the other one is on the right side. They occupy two totally separate areas of space. So on this level of description, the two balls are not the same at all.

And if we're considering the possibility of two G-ds, as soon as you say that something that distinguishes #1 from #2, you're forced to admit that each one cannot be infinitely perfect.

It would be like someone saying that they have two tennis balls – but they are the same in every way – exactly the same shape and size, composed of exactly the same molecules, and both occupying exactly the same position on the table. I'd have to say that that person is either confused, or seeing double! In physical terms, there's no way there can actually be two such balls.

Another G-d?

Even though it's clear that the example of tennis balls proves the point in physical terms, maybe things operate differently when you speak of the meta-physical. We've spent enough time in this chapter appreciating that G-d is far, far removed from any notion of physicality. So how can we know this idea of G-d being "one" fully applies?

If we think about it, we realize that even going beyond tennis balls, and into abstract notions like love, morality, emotions, laws, the same idea holds true.

Let's say a psychologist is trying to describe the discovery of a new emotion. He tells you that it's similar to love, feels exactly the same, comes from the same stimulus, and creates exactly the same pattern of brain waves. You ask him what makes it different than love. He tells you, "Nothing. It's exactly the same in every way and there's absolutely nothing to distinguish it from love." We would be forced to conclude that there's no new emotion being described at all.

There's one last possibility that we should consider. Could G-d, if He wanted to, create another G-d?

The Ramchal says, "It is impossible that there exist more than one being whose existence is intrinsically imperative." How is this so?

Let's say that G-d created another G-d. That second G-d, by virtue of being created, is clearly not a being "whose existence is intrinsically imperative." Otherwise it would have already existed and would not (and could not) have been brought into existence.

Ending This Chapter

We therefore see that there are six basic principles [in understand G-d]:

The fact of His existence
His perfection
The necessity of His existence
His absolute independence
His simplicity
His unity

We see that the Ramchal chose to summarize the contents of this chapters into six short points. I believe he's hinting to us the idea of summarizing each chapter as we complete it. Each chapter has a specific message that becomes a critical building block in creating the edifice that is the macrocosm of Jewish mystical and philosophical thought, The Way of G-d. At each step of this way, we should look back at the steps we've taken, and appreciate the point they've brought us to.

Questions to Think About

Because this is the final segment of Chapter 1: The Creator, we will have a few extra review questions:

  • Why can't there be two infinite beings?
  • Is it possible that G-d created a finite being, and that finite being created and sustains our universe?
  • If so, then why do we only care about relating to the infinite being? After all, the workers in a factory report to, and obey, the manager of their department, not the owner of the factory. So why should it be any different with G-d?
  • How would you answer the challenge of a person who says: "It makes sense that G-d created the world, but I don't think He's involved any more"?
  • How would you answer the challenge of a person who says: "I don't believe there's any force that created the world; look at all the terrible things that happen. If G-d exists, He certainly could have done a better job than this!"
  • How would you answer the challenge of a person who says: "I agree that there must be some force behind all this. But how do you know it's G-d?"

Free PDF Download:
15. One, Not Two

Published: February 24, 2014


Give Tzedakah! Help Aish.com create inspiring
articles, videos and blogs featuring timeless Jewish wisdom.

Submit Your Comment:

  • Display my name?

  • Your email address is kept private. Our editor needs it in case we have a question about your comment.


  • * required field 2000
Submit Comment
stub