click here to jump to start of article
Join Our Newsletter

Get latest articles and videos with Jewish inspiration and insights​




Who Are We Fighting?

Who Are We Fighting?

The war against terror should be aimed at Militant Islam.

by

January 6, 2002 - Who are we fighting? Two main culprits have emerged since Sept. 11: terrorism and Islam. The truth, more subtle, lies between the two--a terroristic version of Islam.

* Terrorism. The establishment--politicians, academics, religious leaders, journalists, along with many Muslims--says terrorism is the enemy. It is carried out by "evildoers" who have nothing to do with Islam but adhere to some murky cult of terrorism.

Secretary of State Colin Powell summarized this view by declaring that the acts of Sept. 11 "should not be seen as something done by Arabs or Islamics; it is something that was done by terrorists." Pretending that the enemy is "terrorism" unconnected to Islam is appealing because it finesses some delicate questions about Islam, thereby making it easier to build an international coalition or minimize domestic repercussions.

But it makes no sense at all. The Taliban government, Al Qaeda, Osama bin Laden, John Walker Lindh, Richard Reid and Zacarias Moussaoui -- all are fervent Muslims acting on behalf of their religion.

More, they have found wide support across the Muslim world (remember those huge demonstrations waving pictures of Bin Laden in September?). Terrorists they are, to be sure, but terrorists with a specific set of beliefs.

Blaming "terrorism" means ignoring those beliefs -- at great cost. If the enemy consists of terrorists "motivated by hate," as President Bush put it, what can one do other than kill them?

Hate lacks an ideology or intellectual framework that one can refute. The West is left with nothing but guns to protect itself from the next assault. There can be no strategy for victory, only tactics to stave off harm.

* Islam. The Western "street" prefers to see the problem lying with the Islamic religion. In this view, Arabs and Muslims have been the leading enemy of Christians for more than a millennium, remain so now and will long continue to fill this role.

Fingering terrorism or Islam neither explains the current problem nor offers a solution.

This enmity stems from the Koran itself and so is immutable, say spokesmen for this argument, who tend to be political conservatives or evangelicals. This too does not hold. If Muslims by nature are hostile, how does one explain Turkey, with its militantly secular culture and abiding good relations with the West?

If all Muslims accept Koranic precepts, how does this account for the tens of thousands of Algerians who lost their lives resisting Islamic rule?

And if Islam is the problem, then there is no possible strategy for winning. It implies that the billion or so Muslims--including millions living in the West--are immutable enemies. They can only be converted from Islam or quarantined, two thoroughly unrealistic programs.

Insisting on Islam as the enemy means a permanent clash of civilizations that cannot be won.

Fingering terrorism or Islam, in short, neither explains the current problem nor offers a solution.

There is third way of approaching the question, which satisfies both these requirements.

Militant Islam derives from Islam but is an anti-modern, anti-Christian, anti-Semitic, terroristic, jihadistic and suicidal version of it.

Islam itself--the centuries-old faith--is not the issue but one extremist variant of it is. Militant Islam derives from Islam but is a misanthropic, misogynist, triumphalist, millennarian, anti-modern, anti-Christian, anti-Semitic, terroristic, jihadistic and suicidal version of it.

Fortunately, it appeals to only about 10% to 15% of Muslims, meaning that a substantial majority would prefer a more moderate version.

This implies a simple and effective strategy: weaken militant Islam around the world and strengthen the moderate alternatives to it. Fight it militarily, diplomatically, legally, intellectually and religiously. Fight it in Afghanistan, in Saudi Arabia, in the United States--in fact, everywhere.

Moderate Muslims will be key allies in this fight. Yes, they are weak and intimidated these days, but they are crucial if the Muslim world is to leave its current bout of radicalism.

Once the U.S. government helps them, they can emerge as a formidable force. (By analogy, remember how the Northern Alliance seemed hapless just a few months ago? Now it is running Afghanistan.)

Only by focusing on militant Islam can Americans both protect themselves from their most determined enemy and eventually defeat it.

This article originally appeared in the LA Times.

Published: January 12, 2002


Give Tzedakah! Help Aish.com create inspiring
articles, videos and blogs featuring timeless Jewish wisdom.

Visitor Comments: 3

(3) Pat McAdam, December 1, 2002 12:00 AM

no simple solution to a complex problem

If history has taught us anything it is that moderates never become the determining element in the unfolding of history. When humankind is exposed to radical paradigm shifts ideological movement tends to be polarized for or against. Appeals to moderation and compromise seldom work and are never enduring. Radical Islam is fanatical and the West's best hope is to expose it for what it truly is at its core. Our own ideology these days lacks definition. What exactly do we stand for? We have become a nation of factions that in spite of our desire for mutual survival cannot entirely come together. This is no longer the America of the WWII generation. How can we begin to inspire when we ourselves cannot aspire to the ideals that made our nation great. The real war on terror is one of ideology. It is not very different than what the war on Facism was to our parent's generation. My hope for America is that exposure to this evil will begin to define us and bring about the desire to become the nation that God has blessed us to be - that light of liberty that shines in a very dark world.

(2) Louis McMahon, January 13, 2002 12:00 AM

What are we doing wong?

When I was a young boy after WWII no one dared to to burn, spit on, step on or even let the American touch the ground. When I say no one that means eighty percent of the World would not allow it to happen. At that time the World loved and respected the U. S. and its symbols. When I was a young man studying abroad and behind the Iron Curtain the same was true. Peoples outside the United States loved and respected the Country and its People; some times even more than most Americans ever had. Ask yourself why!
I do not see the disrespect toward the United States, its Peoples and symbols as a crime. I see these things as a message that we are doing different and wrong from what we have done in the past. I see these things telling us to get back on the track of the way we have done things for the last twohundred years in this Country. It is time to make the World to love and respect the United States as it has in the past.
There was a time when non Americans would die to protect the United States and its Ideals even when they could not share in bounties of this Great Country. We must once agian make it the dream of every one in the World to have the privilage of being a citizan of THE United States of America.

(1) Fred Remington, January 10, 2002 12:00 AM

Koranic denunciation of Judaism

If Islam is so benign, how do you explain the following Hadith of the Prophet Muhammad, "The resurrection of the dead will not come until the Muslims will war with the Jews and the Muslims will kill them. The trees and the rocks will say, "O Muslim, O Abdullah, here is a Jew behind me, come and kill him."

Submit Your Comment:

  • Display my name?

  • Your email address is kept private. Our editor needs it in case we have a question about your comment.


  • * required field 2000
Submit Comment
stub