click here to jump to start of article
Join Our Newsletter

Get latest articles and videos with Jewish inspiration and insights​

Banish Arafat Now

Banish Arafat Now

If this fighting is ever to end, it must be shown that there is a price for violence, terror and duplicity.


Friday, April 5, 2002 -- The suicide bombing that killed 27 Israelis at a Passover Seder last week, the worst slaughter of the 18-month-old intifada, has entered the lexicon of the Arab-Israeli conflict as the Passover Massacre. It is more than that. It was the beginning of the Passover Pogrom: seven days of Passover, seven suicide bombings, dozens of innocent Jews murdered, hundreds maimed.

This is Kristallnacht transposed to Israel. Like Kristallnacht, the Passover Pogrom takes the murder of Jews to a new level of fury and national purpose, in this case Palestinian national purpose: making "death to the Jews" not just a slogan but a strategy, a campaign to make Israeli life intolerable and to force Israel's surrender and ultimate abolition.

It was also Israel's Sept. 11, a time when sporadic terrorism reaches a critical mass of malevolence such that war is the only possible response. And as with the American attack on Afghanistan, Israel is going into Palestinian territory to destroy the terrorists and the regime that sponsors them.

American critics, beginning with the secretary of state, object to this goal of destroying Yasser Arafat's Palestinian Authority. As The Washington Post explained in an editorial, we need the continued presence of "the leadership of the Palestinian Authority as well as its principal security services," because they have been "the only available instruments for stopping Palestinian terrorism."

Good God. Instruments for stopping terrorism? They are instruments for aiding and abetting, equipping and financing, supporting and glorifying terrorism, which they call "martyrdom operations." The question of capabilities is irrelevant. Of course they have the capability. But they have no intention of exercising it.

This is like arguing at the beginning of the Afghan war that we should not attack the Taliban because they were the only instrument in Afghanistan available for bringing al Qaeda to heel. Sure. But they were allied with al Qaeda, commingled with al Qaeda and shared al Qaeda's objectives. They had no intention of ever stopping al Qaeda.

At what point do Western observers allow their Oslo illusions to yield to empirical evidence?

That situation is precisely the same in Palestine. The premise of the Oslo accords was that Israel would gradually withdraw from the West Bank and Gaza, and allow Arafat to build security services so that, as he made peace with Israel, he would have the capability to stop the terrorists. It was a monumental swindle. Instead, he spent 8 1/2 years building a cult of death and a killing machine.

The majority of current suicide bombings are carried out by the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades, a wing of Arafat's own Fatah movement. At Palestinian Authority headquarters in Ramallah, Israel found an invoice (in shekels -- a nice touch) from the terrorists to the Palestinian Authority for five to nine bombs a week. At what point do Western observers allow their Oslo illusions to yield to empirical evidence?

"What Arafat really wants is the destruction of the Israeli state," says the preeminent Arab-Israeli peacemaker Henry Kissinger.

What to do with Arafat? Isolating Arafat is no answer, because the isolation must end at some point. Killing Arafat is no answer, because that will make him a martyr. The important thing is to make him irrelevant by expelling him. Let us not hear any more ridiculous talk about Arafat's being the only man who can make peace. Can? He had 8 1/2 years to make peace. He has no intention of making peace. He was offered his peace, his Palestine, in July 2000 by Israel and then by the president of the United States. Like the Palestinian leadership of 1947, also offered their own state side-by-side with Israel, Arafat rejected the offer and started a war.

"What Arafat really wants is the destruction of the Israeli state," says the preeminent Arab-Israeli peacemaker Henry Kissinger. "He may be willing to make some sort of an interim agreement, which he will consider probably as a stage to the ultimate destruction of the Israeli state."

Why expel him? Because as long as he rules, the Palestinian answer to any offer of peace that genuinely accepts Israel is "No." And there will be no one in Palestine who will dare say "Yes." (If he does, he dies.)

The only hope for any kind of peace is a Palestinian leadership, whether national or local, ready to say yes. And that can only become possible when Arafat has been banished and his rejectionist police state dismantled.

There are reports that Morocco would accept him. Good choice. It is west of Tunisia and thus farther from Palestine. The symbolism will be apposite. He was rescued from his last exile in Tunisia by an Israel offering him the olive branch of Oslo. He then chose war instead.

President Bush yesterday offered Arafat yet another olive branch, yet another rescue. This will achieve nothing. This will only postpone the reckoning. If this fighting is ever to end, it must be shown that there is a price for violence, terror and duplicity. The price is Elba. No, St. Helena.


April 8, 2002

Give Tzedakah! Help create inspiring
articles, videos and blogs featuring timeless Jewish wisdom.
The opinions expressed in the comment section are the personal views of the commenters. Comments are moderated, so please keep it civil.

Visitor Comments: 5

(5) Vicky Mitchell, April 14, 2002 12:00 AM

Arafat & peace?

What a joke! Arafat and peace in the same sentence. How dense is the world anyway? Arafat won't be happy until he pushes every Israeli into the sea. Although if he could blow them up first he'd be satisfied with that, too. He's a terrorist and nothing else and I am profoundly ashamed of my government for meeting with him.

(4) Heather, April 13, 2002 12:00 AM

Your article is right

I agree 100%, the only way for a peace process to even begin is to exile Arafat. As an American I am very sad and horrified at the stand President Bush is taking against Israel. Israel has the right to not only exist, but to be secure. Yes America is important, but so is Israel and we as Israel's greatest friend have an obligation to support them. If there is something I can do to support Israel please e-mail me. I pray for the peace of Jerusalem everyday.

(3) Josh Cohen, April 9, 2002 12:00 AM

Thanks to Krauthammer & Pipes

Thank you, Aish, for printing articles by these clear, bold thinkers! Are decision-makers in the Israeli & US governments listening?!

(2) Aaron, April 9, 2002 12:00 AM

I think it is dangerous for us as Americans to get emotionally involved in the middle east. The good of America should be paramount to all Americans and President Bush is looking out for Americans and American interests first and foremost over anything else, which he should. Both Sharon and Arafat are flawed human beings who have done bad things and the more America supports Israel, the more enemies we make. There is no question that Israel has been under siege by terrorism, and we must help Israel fight terrorism. But Israel has inflicted a tremendous amount of damage to the Palestinians. Mopping up terrorism is one thing, but showing the world a willingness to compromise is in my mind a sign of strength. I believe that the real reason this whole conflict is what it is, is money. Israel and the United States live better economically than many of these Middle Eastern countries, they are jealous and resentful. So they use radical, extremist religious propoganda to try to drum up support for their cause. In the final analysis, I believe that we as Americans should not get emotionally involved and keep our American interests first before anything else.

(1) Tim Harlow, April 9, 2002 12:00 AM

Disgusted and frustrated

It saddens me the stand that President Bush has taken. Israel needs to get rid of all the palestinian militants and make Israel a secure and safe nation. I feel for the jews and the palestin-ians, but unfortunately the palestinians have to suffer the consequences because of whom they chose as their leader. I think for the United States the War on Terror will not be the same. God Bless Israel

Submit Your Comment:

  • Display my name?

  • Your email address is kept private. Our editor needs it in case we have a question about your comment.

  • * required field 2000
Submit Comment