click here to jump to start of article
Join Our Newsletter

Get latest articles and videos with Jewish inspiration and insights​

No Joy In Stockholm

No Joy In Stockholm

The resolution of the United Nations Human Rights Commission supporting the use of "all available means, including armed struggle" to achieve Palestinian statehood is far from being a garden-variety Israel-bashing move.


Large-scale exterminations of a religious or ethnic group usually don't "just happen" haphazardly. Long gone are the days in which wild-eyed pagans would run amok on whims, slaughtering innocents on a moment's notice. Contemporary annihilation campaigns have tended more to resemble fund-raising campaigns, requiring a great deal of premeditation and organization intended to make the horrific thinkable, indeed "acceptable," to national, and sometimes world, opinion.

After modern-day mass murder has occurred, sometimes hindsight helps identify a turning point where the groundwork for legitimizing the unspeakable had been firmly laid. In the case of the Holocaust, for example, the passage of the Nuremberg Laws, or perhaps Kristalnacht, can be said to have played that role.

That some Palestinians and many of their Islamist fellow travelers seek nothing other than, as "twentieth hijacker" Zacarias Moussaoui forthrightly put it in federal court this week, "the destruction of the Jewish people and state" is too obvious a point to belabor. But in the current drive of the jihadists to make that destruction a reality, the conceptual stage necessary to achieve it was strengthened by a little-noted action taken by some well-known members of the "community of nations."

On April 15, the United Nations Human Rights Commission, citing Israel's manifold human rights violations, but with nary a mention of Palestinian terrorism, passed a resolution supporting the use of "all available means, including armed struggle" to achieve Palestinian statehood. The two-week period surrounding that vote was an unusually hectic time for the Commission. During that short time-span, the group, in quick succession, voted not to condemn both Zimbabwe and Iran for arbitrary executions and torture, as well as violence against women and minorities, and only by razor-thin votes managed to express concern over the human rights situations in the Sudan and Cuba, respectively. The anti-Israel vote, by contrast, was 40-6, with 7 abstentions.

The resolution actually endorses the use of terrorism to further the Palestinian cause.

Far from being a garden-variety Israel-bashing move of the sort that has been de rigueur at the U.N. for decades, the resolution is unprecedented in two respects.

First, it explicitly legitimates -- actually, endorses -- the use of terrorism to further the Palestinian cause.

There may be some countries that, like Belgium, voted for the resolution because it "could be seen as a call for peace." To see it that way, one would best stand at a vantage point somewhere in Lewis Carroll's Wonderland.

But this much is clear: Yasser Arafat certainly reads the Commission's phrase "by all available means, including armed struggle" as an invitation to murder and mayhem.

Perhaps more importantly, those who joined the Islamic bloc countries to vote in favor of blowing up women and children at malls and Seder tables extended beyond the usual suspects like co-sponsors China, Cuba and Vietnam. This time, six European Union nations joined them voted that way as well. The six moral dwarfs by name: Austria, Belgium, France, Portugal, Spain and Sweden.

That Austria, which spawned a certain Fuhrer and, decades later, elevated one of his soldiers to its presidency, would vote this way might not surprise greatly. Nor ought we be particularly astounded that the folks who brought us Torquemada and the auto-da-fe -- Spain and Portugal -- would cast a cold eye against the Jews. As for France, of which Jews have such fond memories labeled Dreyfus and Vichy and on whose streets les Juifs must now be as afraid to walk as in the Damascus bazaar, there's no cause for wonderment in its vote either. But Sweden, proud member of the Scandinavian peninsula of tolerance and neutrality?!

We need not be overly disheartened, though, over Sweden's action. The Swedish ambassador reassures us that, in fact, his country supported the resolution "without joy" but that, to its deep chagrin, "the sponsors did not want to accept further improvements to the resolution."

Thus, it was with an apparently heavy and conflicted heart that the Swedes decided to sign on. It may be small comfort for some, but next time, God forbid, a bomb explodes in Haifa or Hadera, know that somewhere, far off to the North, are some Swedish diplomats who regard the events "without joy."

May 11, 2002

Give Tzedakah! Help create inspiring
articles, videos and blogs featuring timeless Jewish wisdom.
The opinions expressed in the comment section are the personal views of the commenters. Comments are moderated, so please keep it civil.

Visitor Comments: 5

(5) Anonymous, May 17, 2002 12:00 AM

Portuguese/Spanish lack of morality

Dear Mr Kobre;

I am greatly distressed, unbearably grieved, Shocked, and deeply Outraged by this unconscionable decision of the Portuguese/Spanish governments to support this latest UN resolution.

If I knew where to write, I would certainly be more than able to send along my deepest expression of profound Disgust, Incredulity, and Shock at this Morally and Ethically hideous stance, on behalf of the populations they say that they "represent".

Government Reps are here today, elected out tomorrow, but their hideous legacy, bitterly lingers on.

I would like to receive information of where I could write for maximum impact.

Yours Very Truly,

Otillia de Andrade

(4) Eli Felderman, May 14, 2002 12:00 AM

Yes, the swedes have a good record when
it comes to Jews. During the Holocaust era the king of Sweden donned a yellow Star of david on his clothing in a unifying sympathetic gesture with his jewish subjects. But those days are long gone, and the political climate that exists in Sweden today, is completely pro Palestinian, pro Arab. Of course the UN has long been anti-semitic. Israel being the lone sheep amongst the 70 wolves. Afterall, if there's one thing Europe and the Muslims can agree upon, and in fact share, it's their undeniable anti-semitism.

(3) Alain E. Sportiche, May 14, 2002 12:00 AM

No shame

"Just before the advent of Messiah, insolence will increase, honor will be perverted, truth will be lacking".(Babylonian Talmud, Sotah 49b and Sanhedrin 97a

(2) Anonymous, May 13, 2002 12:00 AM

Chilling but expected.

When will the United Nations just explode?

(1) Anonymous, May 13, 2002 12:00 AM

As a Swedish Jew I can tell all you other Aish readers that Sweden is just doing what it does the best; which is going with the flow. Or in other words :Everyone including the Swedes know that Sweden trims its sails according to the wind.

Submit Your Comment:

  • Display my name?

  • Your email address is kept private. Our editor needs it in case we have a question about your comment.

  • * required field 2000
Submit Comment