click here to jump to start of article
Join Our Newsletter

Get latest articles and videos with Jewish inspiration and insights​




Free Palestine Can Become a Reality

Free Palestine Can Become a Reality

A plan for peace and democracy.

by

July 3, 2002 -- For many years, a psychological Rubicon had blocked any hope for achieving a genuine peace between Israelis and Palestinians. With his speech last week, President Bush has led American diplomacy across that Rubicon, and hope for a genuine peace has finally emerged.

For nearly a decade, the peace process was held hostage to an idea that has a long pedigree of failure: that strong leaders can make a strong peace. Far from seeing a Palestinian regime unfettered by the constraints imposed by democratic rule as endangering the peace process, some even considered such a regime essential for safeguarding it. As former Prime Minister Yitzhak Rabin so succinctly put it, the Palestinian Authority would fight terror unhindered by a Supreme Court, human rights organizations and all sorts of bleeding-heart liberals.

That things did not work out as planned is now clear to everyone. Arafat's Palestinian Authority used the power and resources given to it not to build a better future for Palestinians, but to construct an infrastructure of terror and indoctrinate an entire generation of Palestinians into a culture of death.

President Bush made clear that the source of the problem is the nature of the Palestinian regime, not this or that Palestinian leader.

Unfortunately, it is still widely believed that all that is necessary to get the peace process back on track is to convince him or some other Palestinian interlocutor that nothing will be gained through the use of terror. But with his speech last week, President Bush made clear that the source of the problem is the nature of the Palestinian regime, not this or that Palestinian leader.

The president's words point to a truth that many seem to have forgotten: that there is a fundamental difference between democratic leaders and dictators. Because democratic leaders are dependent on the will of the people, they strive to promote peace and prosperity, opting for war only as a last resort. By contrast, in dictatorships, external enemies become the dictator's lifeblood, enabling him to divert discontent with his own repressive rule.

Reared in the Soviet Union, I came to understand that international security and democracy are inextricably linked. President Bush's speech suggests he shares a similar vision. The question now facing policy makers, both in Israel and around the world, is how to translate this vision into a workable peace plan. Two months ago, I presented just such a plan to Prime Minister Ariel Sharon.

The first step would be the establishment of an international coordinating body. This organization, headed by the United States, and including those Arab states that recognize Israel, will be responsible for establishing a Palestinian Administrative Authority (PAA) to administer the areas under Palestinian control during a three-year transition period. Israel involvement in this process will be limited to a right to veto candidates to the PAA who have been connected to terrorist activities against Israel.

The PAA will be responsible for administering the day-to-day lives of the Palestinians in matters such as the economy, law enforcement and education. Israel will be responsible for security and freedom of passage in all of the West Bank, and will retain the right to set up transition zones and buffer zones to prevent the resurgence of terror activities.

The PAA will be expected to develop the infrastructure for Palestinian democratic life. This must include formulating new educational programs that inculcate values of peace rather than terror, securing freedom of political, social and religious association, and guaranteeing freedom of speech and freedom of the press. The distribution of international aid and assistance will be dependent on ensuring these freedoms.

The coordinating body will dismantle all Palestinian refugee camps, and a normal existence will be offered for those evacuated from the camps. Arab countries, with assistance from the United Nations, will finance this effort. An international fund will be established to create and finance industrial zones, infrastructure projects, and other economic activities in the PAA.

After a three-year transition period, free elections will be held in the areas administered by the PAA. Israel will then negotiate the terms of a permanent peace with the elected representatives of the Palestinian people.

In the climate of fear, hatred and death that Arafat has created, it will be difficult, if not impossible, to find leaders who dare to work openly for peace.

The plan outlined above recognizes that in the climate of fear, hatred and death that Arafat has created, it will be difficult, if not impossible, to find leaders who dare to work openly for peace. In order to enable such leaders to emerge and allow Palestinians to freely express their views in a democratic climate, a transition period is absolutely necessary. During this period, Palestinians can lay the foundations of democratic life and combat the effects of years of propaganda and incitement.

Just as Germany and Japan had to undergo a process of rehabilitation in order to rejoin the international community following World War II, so today Palestinian society must undergo a transformation.

I hope that we will not be sidetracked once again by accepting Arafat's phony promises of reform or legitimating his call for snap elections. This will only serve to perpetuate dictatorial rule that will preclude the possibility of peace. Everyone who genuinely wants peace in our region should now heed the president's call and work toward reforming Palestinian society. For only if the Palestinians are truly free can we hope to achieve peace and stability in the Middle East.

This article originally appeared in the Wall Street Journal.

Published: July 6, 2002


Give Tzedakah! Help Aish.com create inspiring
articles, videos and blogs featuring timeless Jewish wisdom.

Visitor Comments: 9

(9) david, January 2, 2007 5:54 AM

There is no such thing as palestine

There is no such thing as palestine.The Romans in order to humiliate Jews after the revolt gave this name to Eretz Israel.The palestinians of today are nothing more than extensions of Jordan and Egypt.If Palestine is created then that means giving away parts of Judea and Samaria which is unacceptable.This land has been given to us as a gift from G-D.Giving away something that you received from G-D is like insulting Him.And after making a "free democratic palestine" what would you tell the families of the soldiers who died defending and capturing this land in 1948,1967,1973,etc. These soldiers who died for this land,they died so that in future this parts of Israel remain in Jewish control.They didnot give their lives so that in future A palestine is created on this lands.Living and Dwelling in this land is every Jew's Divine Birth Right. And Nobody can take it away from them.

(8) Valery Yakubov, August 8, 2002 12:00 AM

Arabs have had many chances to prove that they want peace and democracy, but they don't want no peace, no democratic institutes. Their main aim is to destroy Israel and they don't care what would follow after.
To let them try another chance? In Russia we don't believe that wolf may turn to sheep. The first step the Arabs can prove the world that they want peace is to stop their "shakhids". If they don't do that, so why do we wait for more?

(7) Gil Stamberger, July 9, 2002 12:00 AM

one country - 2 states

Nathan Sharansky makes a good point for democracy. He fails however to make a clear statement about the outcome of negotiations and what needs to be offered to the Palestinians at the end of the negotiation period. The matter should be clear. Palestine is Eretz Israel is Palestine is Eretz Israel and only by compromising on the territory and establishing two states peace will come in the end. The path to peace is long. What is frightening is how many Jews have become the reflected image of Arab fanatics. Compare the number of innocent people who died on both sides ? Who can judge whose life is worth more? Do we want peace ? We will have to share the country. To demand from the Palestinians to leave their homeland is simply idiotic and not worthy of a Jew.

(6) benzion, July 9, 2002 12:00 AM

Lost details of history

I want to remind you some "minor facts" lost in the article.
You wrote: "Just as Germany and Japan had to undergo a process of rehabilitation in order to rejoin the international community following World War II, so today Palestinian society must undergo a transformation. "
Reminder:
Those mentioned countries, before they started a process of rehabilitation, were militarily CRASHED, their population, including civilians, were
significantly reduced and devastated . Can you imagine that Nazi Germany would start reforms voluntarily before they lost the war?
Did Japan want to start reforms before nuclear attack on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?

Palestinians have not lost the war , which they started. Why should they reform?
Not considering such facts of history, your vision might be quite utopian and, therefore, dangerous to your country and your people.

(5) Paul Kaplan, July 8, 2002 12:00 AM

Mr. Sharansky is foolish.

Mr. Sharansky is foolish.He talks as if he is dealing with reasonable people.This is the same stupid error, over and over.

See All Comments

Submit Your Comment:

  • Display my name?

  • Your email address is kept private. Our editor needs it in case we have a question about your comment.


  • * required field 2000
Submit Comment
stub