The Fitna Controversy
click here to jump to start of article
Join Our Newsletter

Get latest articles and videos with Jewish inspiration and insights​




The Fitna Controversy

The Fitna Controversy

Facing the truth about jihadist violence.

by

The global jihad is unpleasant. Consequently "Fitna," the controversial new film about the Koran and jihadist violence produced by the Dutch parliamentarian Geert Wilders, is also unpleasant. Parts of it are graphic and violent, and you might find it difficult to watch.

But watch it you should, if only to remind yourself of two things the media are generally too intimidated or politically correct to dwell on: Jihadists are waging a bloody and barbaric war, and they are waging it with explicit reference to their religion.

Wilders's 16-minute film intersperses quotations from the Koran with scenes of Islamist atrocities, such as the Al-Qaeda attacks on New York and Madrid, the beheading of Nick Berg, and the "honor killing" of women. To drive home the point that such horrors are committed in the name of Islam by fervent Muslims, "Fitna" includes footage of Islamic preachers exhorting their followers to crush the infidels and win the world for Allah. (" Throats must be slit and skulls must be shattered," urges one. "This is the path to victory.") There are also clips indicating how pervasive such hateful indoctrination can be: In a scene aired on Saudi TV, a 3-year-old girl repeats what she has been taught: that according to the Koran, Jews are apes and pigs.

Yet what has been controversial about "Fitna" is not the abhorrent behavior it depicts, but that Wilders links such behavior to the Koran. Why that should be so notorious is unclear -- after all, the jihadists themselves emphatically cite the Koran to justify their violence.

Nevertheless, "Fitna" has been widely condemned. The Dutch prime minister issued statements in Dutch and English saying the film "serves no other purpose than to cause offense." UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon pronounced it "offensively anti-Islamic." The European Union's Slovenian presidency blasted it for "inflaming hatred." Australian Foreign Minister Stephen Smith described it as "an obvious attempt to generate discord between faith communities."

There were denunciations aplenty, of course, from the Muslim world as well. Reuters reported that Iran's foreign ministry labeled the film "heinous, blasphemous, and anti-Islamic," while the Indonesian government declared it "an insult to Islam." In Jordan, 53 members of parliament demanded the expulsion of the Dutch ambassador. The Organization of the Islamic Conference denounced "Fitna" as "a deliberate act of discrimination against Muslims" meant to "provoke unrest and intolerance."

The violence "Fitna" portrays is horribly real, and the fanatics who commit it are explicit in saying they do so as Muslims. Where is the Islamic world's outrage against that?

Granted, there is nothing subtle about Wilders's film. Anyone who didn't know better might think after watching it that Islam is irredeemably violent, or that all Muslims seethe with religious hatred. Neither is true. "Like all great religions," the scholar Daniel Pipes has written, "Islam is subject to a number of interpretations, from the mystical to the militant, from the quietist to the revolutionary. . . . The terroristic jihad against the West is one reading of Islam, but it is not the eternal essence of Islam." Zealots who insist that Islam itself is the enemy condemn us, in effect, to a war without end. They also betray the anti-Islamist moderates of the Muslim world, who are as repelled by the fanatics as non-Muslims are.

Still, it isn't as though Wilders had to invent anything. The violence "Fitna" portrays is horribly real, and the fanatics who commit it are explicit in saying they do so as Muslims. Where is the Islamic world's outrage against that? When has Iran's foreign ministry ever excoriated the beheading of a hostage, or the poisonous sermon of a jihadist imam, as "heinous, blasphemous, and anti-Islamic?" How often has the Organization of the Islamic Conference thundered its disapproval of "honor killings" or Islamist anti-semitism? When Theo van Gogh was murdered in public, when the Taliban turned Afghanistan into a repressive terror state, when fatwas were issued for the murder of Danish cartoonists -- where was the chorus of Muslim anguish then?

Nor is "Fitna," whatever its flaws, as dangerously misguided as the eagerness with which Western governments rushed to denounce it. Panicked at the prospect of Islamist violence, desperate to appease extremists who respond to "insults" with mobs and mayhem, they ostentatiously deplored Wilders's exercise of free speech instead of defending it. They would never have reacted that way to a film that criticized Christianity or the United States or European tradition -- and the Islamists know it.

Cringing before bullies is not the way to defend Western civilization. There is room for "Fitna" in the marketplace of ideas. Heaven help us if we are too timorous to say so.

Published: April 5, 2008


Give Tzedakah! Help Aish.com create inspiring
articles, videos and blogs featuring timeless Jewish wisdom.

Visitor Comments: 32

(32) Leslie-Ann, December 16, 2008 1:51 PM

Mr. Wilder Lives With 24 Hour Security...

due to death threats for speaking out. Doesn't this prove the point of his movie?

(31) Chris Hibbert, August 30, 2008 7:27 AM

Good Movie

Very good point raised by Erich. Muslims themselves provided the material for the movie. What is wrong with feeding their words back to them? If they are embarrased by their own words they should choose them more carefully. The suprising thing about the movie is how many people in authority are promoting the violence. Their T.V. and islamic leaders are all calling for murder. Why then should we write them off as a few extremists!

(30) Anonymous, April 15, 2008 2:21 PM

Haunting film, Denial does not serve humanity well

I am a "Wasp" who recently viewed Fitna, as links to the Fitna site have been dispersing throughout the web. It was disturbing, & I thought, important enough for me to forward the link to all my friends and plead with them to watch. Denial is rarely a healthy coping mechanism and our world would do well to pay attention to the film -- and I very much agree with your blog on "Heaven help us if we are too timorous to say so." Blessings and stay safe. Know you are loved and that many non jewish people wish you and the jewish community all the best that this world has to offer. Joy, Peace, Love, Hope.

(29) pare, April 12, 2008 3:50 AM

Facing the truth about jihadist violence.

Vey good and right analysis. You set the truth. Thank you

(28) Char, April 11, 2008 12:29 PM

Imram needs to see the other side

Imram resents the truth be told -- he doesn't want someone calling his sister names; he should step out to the receiving end of what the Muslims say about us and what they do to us and what they say they will do -- convert or die! He's offended by name calling -- The Muslims insult our God and our people, and call us names. We are not deluded, but the Muslims are very much deluded. They cannot love their neighbor as themselves for they only recognize and respect their own kind. This is why we can't live beside them in "peace." Their Qu'ran preaches the opposite - kill the infidels -of the Bible - to love your enemies and do good them them that say all manner of evil against you for my name's sake. Vengeance is mine, sayeth the Lord, and I WILL REPAY says the Lord.

There was a decree that went out to kill the Jews from Iran 2,500 years ago, and today we hear it again. Did they not learn anything?

See All Comments

Submit Your Comment:

  • Display my name?

  • Your email address is kept private. Our editor needs it in case we have a question about your comment.


  • * required field 2000
Submit Comment
stub
Sign up today!