The Peace Test
click here to jump to start of article
Join Our Newsletter

Get latest articles and videos with Jewish inspiration and insights​




The Peace Test

The Peace Test

It's time to be candid about the results. Israelis, Americans, and Europeans are serious about peace. Their enemies are serious about defeating them.

by

The anniversary passed with scarcely a mention. Six years ago, on June 24, 2002, President Bush turned American policy in the Middle East in a new direction. In a ground-breaking speech, he announced that the U.S. would support the creation of a Palestinian state. His only condition was that Palestinians first choose "leaders not compromised by terror." He asked also that they "confront corruption," and "build a practicing democracy based on tolerance and liberty."

Bush was optimistic that this would come to pass, and that by the time he left the White House, a Palestinian state and a Jewish state would be living side by side in peace. In the years that followed, the stars appeared to be aligning.

In 2004, Yasser Arafat died, removing from the scene the longtime Palestinian leader most identified with terrorism and corruption (and never seriously tempted by tolerance or liberty). In 2005, Israel ended its occupation of Gaza, pulling out every soldier, farmer, and grave, but leaving behind greenhouses for Palestinians to use to grow vegetables and flowers. (They were trashed instead.)

In 2006, elections were held in Gaza and the West Bank. Those elections were widely regarded as free and fair. (That required ignoring the fact that Palestinians did not enjoy freedom of speech, the press, or assembly.) Hamas, a terrorist organization, declared itself a political party and won. Even so, there was hope that, entrusted with authority, Hamas would demonstrate responsibility over time.

But it was more power that Hamas' leaders coveted, so in 2007 they launched a wave of violence against rival Fatah security forces. Since then, Hamas has been unchallenged in Gaza and no one talks of new elections or civil rights.

Nor has Hamas attempted to build an economic base. Instead, it turned to Iran's rulers for money and guidance -- and then complained that Palestinians were living in squalor because they weren't receiving sufficient funds from the U.S. and Europe.

Hamas rains missiles on Israeli towns, sends terrorists on missions, and assigns suicide-bombers to blow up the few border crossings with Israel. Then Hamas complains about Israel.

Hamas rains missiles on Israeli towns, sends terrorists into Israel on killing and kidnapping missions, and assigns suicide-bombers to blow up the few border crossings with Israel. Then Hamas complains that Israel is not delivering as much food, medicine, gasoline, and electricity as Palestinians require. (United Nations employees in Gaza complain about that, too.)

Meanwhile, in the West Bank, Palestinian Authority (PA) President Mahmoud Abbas is in charge of increasingly less. Is he at least uncompromised by terror? Samir Quntar has been incarcerated in an Israeli prison for having used his rifle to crush the head of a four-year-old Israeli girl, after first killing her father. As I write this, Quntar is expected to be freed in a prisoner swap with Hezbollah, Iran's proxy in neighboring Lebanon. Palestinian Media Watch reports that on the Palestinian television station run by Abbas, Quntar is being celebrated as a "hero" and a "brave warrior."

Despite all this, on his most recent visit to the Middle East in May, President Bush expressed optimism that an Israeli-Palestinian peace agreement could be struck before his term ends in January 2009. The basis for his optimism is elusive. He might just as well hold out hope that before New Year's Eve, Social Security will be reformed, the tax code will be simplified, a bipartisan agreement will be struck on immigration and Harriet Miers will take her seat on the Supreme Court.

Six years ago last month, President Bush established a new paradigm for American policy in the Middle East -- but he did not take into account the reality of the radical ideologies ascendant in the Muslim world. He believed that Palestinians wanted a state to call their own -- and that they wanted that more than they wanted the destruction of the Jewish state next door.

With that in mind, in 2002 Bush said: "If liberty can blossom in the rocky soil of the West Bank and Gaza, it will inspire millions of men and women around the globe who are equally weary of poverty and oppression. . . . This moment is both an opportunity and a test for all parties in the Middle East: an opportunity to lay the foundations for future peace; a test to show who is serious about peace and who is not."

He was right. It was a test. And now it's time to be candid about the results. Israelis, Americans, and Europeans are serious about peace. The enemies of Israelis, Americans, and European are serious about defeating Israelis, Americans, and Europeans. It's as simple -- and as complex -- as that.

This article originally appeared in the National Review.

Published: July 12, 2008


Give Tzedakah! Help Aish.com create inspiring
articles, videos and blogs featuring timeless Jewish wisdom.

Visitor Comments: 8

(8) Anonymous, July 21, 2008 2:18 AM

I really enjoyed this article, because it shows just exactly why there is no peace in the Middle East. We cannot expect peace in a region where terrorists are allowed to run rampant, and encouraged to kill their neighbors. It's ludicrous to think that there can be peace in a region where only part of the occupants are concerned about peace. The other part is not concerned about peace, because they were raised to believe that killing others is their path to "glory."

I just wish that we could have peace, but there can never be any peace with killing being a way of life for some, and others not sure of when the next bomb, terrorist, or kidnapping will go off. I pray that God will bless His people, there in Israel, and that all of them will continue to lean on Him for their daily care. I am not a Jew, or an Israeli, but it makes me angry that people can look the other way, while Israel is being pummeled from all sides, just because people are jealous of what the Israeli's have in being God's chosen people. God cares for Israel, and I don't believe that He will allow anyone to destroy His people, and His nation.

I do pray for the "peace of Jerusalem," and pray that all who live there will work together to protect what they have. I pray for my own country, America, that we will open our eyes, and see what is happening, and rise up against the evil that is trying to destroy Israel. Here, we hear it said, "God Bless America!" I'm all for that, but I think we need to be praying, "God Bless Israel!"

Thank your for your article. It may have been a short one, but it has so much truth in it, and I hope everyone who reads it will see that we need to do all that we can to help Israel, even if it is only in being in prayer for Israel, and her people.

May God bless you, and keep you in His care!


(7) liran, July 18, 2008 12:45 PM

peace

The tv footage of the released terrorist Samir Kuntar showed clearly the hatred arabs have for Israel, how can there ever be peace.With all the good will in the world Israel cannot make peace alone , the arabs have to stop hating first.
,

(6) Rose, July 18, 2008 5:43 AM

The fate of the Western world

The future of the Western World will be no different than what Israel is facing now.Michigan has become a majority muslim state and Europe's muslim population is increasing at a rapid rate.The Holocaust has been the Trojan horse for muslims,they cry out islamaphobia every time they are criticised.Even terrorism has not opened the eyes of the liberal idiots to the dangers of Islam.
As a believer in the Almighty,I think God is pushing His people to call upon Him for help rather than depend on others.

(5) jt, July 14, 2008 8:30 PM

arabs don't want peace or a state

the arabs want only the destruction of israel and the jewish people. that is their stated goal. they wil lie, cheat, steal and kill to do this.

(4) Daniela, July 13, 2008 5:56 PM

Wouldn't it be nice if this were in Newsweek or Time as well ? or better yet, the Guardian and the Int'l Herald Tribune.

See All Comments

Submit Your Comment:

  • Display my name?

  • Your email address is kept private. Our editor needs it in case we have a question about your comment.


  • * required field 2000
Submit Comment
stub