Usurping History
click here to jump to start of article
Join Our Newsletter

Get latest articles and videos with Jewish inspiration and insights​




Usurping History

Usurping History

How not to advance Arab-Israeli peace.

by

Throughout his life, one of Yasser Arafat's favorite themes was that there was no historical Jewish connection to Israel.

He would assert that there never was a Jewish Temple in Jerusalem, that the Western Wall has no Jewish significance, and even that Abraham himself wasn't a Jew.

Indeed, he went so far as to reject the Jewish link to Jerusalem in the presence of President Bill Clinton during the Camp David talks, evoking outrage from the American leader and offering insight into why the negotiations were doomed to fail.

Arafat's views, unsurprisingly, were echoed relentlessly by Palestinian media outlets and textbooks, not to mention Muslim clergy. Generations of Palestinians were "educated" to believe that the Jews were interlopers, not a people indigenous to the Middle East.

This had nothing to do with history, since there was abundant evidence of the intimate Jewish tie to the land dating back well over 3500 years, not to mention the spiritual and metaphysical meaning of Jerusalem as the heart and soul of the Jewish narrative.

And, needless to say, Arafat never chose to explain why Jerusalem is mentioned in the Hebrew Bible nearly 700 times, while not once in the Koran. Or why, when Jerusalem was in Jordanian hands from 1948 to 1967, not a single Arab leader besides Jordan's king chose to visit what was then considered a backwater city. Only when all of Jerusalem fell into Israel's hands in 1967 did the city suddenly seem to take on a magical, magnetic meaning for the Arab and larger Muslim world.

Instead, at the risk of stating the obvious, Arafat's revisionism had everything to do with politics and propaganda.

If Palestinian leaders could cut the link between Jews and the region, then they would undermine the very legitimacy of Israel.

Moreover, there was something else at work. It wasn't just that the Jews allegedly had no ties to any of these sites, but also that the Muslims did. In other words, what was at work was a usurpation of Jewish history and its replacement with Islamic history - a kind of across-the-board super-sessionism by a religion that began more than 2000 years after Judaism.

Arafat died in 2004, but his beliefs most assuredly didn't.

Typical of this ongoing mindset is the Palestinian Authority's chief Islamic judge, Sheikh Tayseer Rajab Tamimi, who recently denied that Jews had ever lived in Jerusalem or that the Jewish Temple ever existed.

The Turkish Prime Minister states that the al-Aqsa Mosque, the Cave of the Patriarchs, and Rachel's Tomb "were not and never will be Jewish sites, but Islamic sites."

And now, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan joins the fray, continuing his recent policy of never missing an opportunity to castigate Israel and proclaim pan-Islamic solidarity. In a Saudi newspaper, he states that the al-Aqsa Mosque, the Cave of the Patriarchs, and Rachel's Tomb "were not and never will be Jewish sites, but Islamic sites."

For the record, the Cave of the Patriarchs, in Hebron, is revered as Judaism's second holiest site, after the Western Wall in Jerusalem. Rachel's Tomb, in Bethlehem, is Judaism's third holiest site. As for the al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem, Israel has gone out of its way since 1967 to respect Muslim religious authority there, even as the land underneath the mosque, the Temple Mount, is central to Jewish religion and history.

Indeed, this troubling pattern of trying to deny or extinguish a Jewish presence extends deeper into the region.

The other evening, my wife and I met a distinguished American journalist with over three decades' experience covering major news stories around the world.

Hearing an accent, she asked my wife where she was from. On learning that my wife was originally from Libya, she inquired as to when and why she had left. My wife replied that, as a Jew, she and her family were compelled to flee their ancestral homeland in 1967, just after the Six-Day War triggered a paroxysm of violence that resulted in the murder of many Libyan Jews.

The journalist said that she hadn't realized Jews ever lived there, much less that Jews, together with native Berbers, predated the Arab conquest and occupation of Libya by centuries. She couldn't conceive that every last trace of the Jewish presence in Libya, including synagogues and cemeteries, had been wiped out, as if the Jews had never existed.

When my wife added that the story was more or less repeated across much of the Arab world, with hundreds of thousands of Jews forced to leave because of persecution, violence, and intimidation, our interlocutor voiced embarrassment that all of this was new to her. Why hadn't she known, she asked rhetorically?

Well, the answer may be threefold.

First, the Arab countries themselves have sought to avoid any discussion of the subject, much less acknowledge the presence of Jews on their soil for centuries or, in the case of nations like Libya, millennia. For their own reasons, they would rather whitewash history.

Second, the Western media barely focused on the mass exodus or its implications. It just wasn't deemed a newsworthy story. As one striking illustration, the New York Times devoted exactly two tiny news briefs in 1967 to the end of the Libyan Jewish community.

Third, the Jewish refugees, until quite recently, were too busy establishing new lives to dwell on their kidnapped histories - or, more precisely, their erased histories, as if they had never existed in lands they once called home.

And even when they tried, who was listening? The UN? No. The media? No. Arab leaders like Assad of Syria and Qadhafi of Libya? No. Even Western officials largely yawned when presented with the facts, perhaps because it only made a complicated Middle East puzzle still more so, even if it was an essential piece of that puzzle.

But all is not entirely bleak. There are a few bright spots.

Morocco and Tunisia have always been exceptions to the rule. While the bulk of Jews from both countries did leave for fear of their future, those who stayed behind have been respected as an integral part of the nations' fabric and fiber.

And last week in Cairo, history was made. A synagogue and a yeshiva, both associated with the legacy of the towering 12th-century Jewish rabbi, scholar, and physician Maimonides, have been carefully restored and will be open to the public, marking a step forward in finally acknowledging the Jewish role in Egypt's history.

The quest for coexistence is achieved not by treaties alone, but by a spirit of mutual acceptance, understanding, and respect.

Those who would cavalierly deny the Jewish people their history and religious sensitivities, whether in Jerusalem, Hebron, or Tripoli, while demanding full recognition of all their own claims, are doing the cause of peace no service.

This article originally appeared in the Huffington Post.

Published: March 13, 2010


Give Tzedakah! Help Aish.com create inspiring
articles, videos and blogs featuring timeless Jewish wisdom.

Visitor Comments: 25

(25) Joshua, April 13, 2010 5:12 PM

Arafat

Farly recently I observed on youtube a feature on Palestinian Arabs on the West Bank of Jewish descendents, some of whom are practising Jews in secret. In interview they declared they could trace their ancestry to the time of Bar Kochba. What a loathsome person this Arafat, and all those after him who create uneccessary discourse for the purpose of sustaining a conflict that should have long been settled.

(24) Anonymous, March 29, 2010 2:39 PM

Face the harsh realities here!!

Some of the last comments were very naive. As the Author ably points out, Arafat was not interested in peace. The PA, feigning an interest in peace, really wanted the incremental strangling of the state of Israel while it's 'estranged' brothers, Hamas and Hezbollah made no secret of planning Israel's destruction. Look at what the Islamic Waqf has done on the Temple Mount: they have excavated and systematically tried to destroy all the archeological artifacts that testify to the existence of Herod's temple on the mount. Israel stands by and is afraid to do anything for fear of inciting riots. I commend to you for your consideration the movie: "Relentless". It is a well documented history giving an accurate overview of Israel's modern historic relationship with it's neighbors. As we see Lebanon allowing Hezbollah to rearm to the teeth, Iran proceeding unhindered with its nuclear weapon program, and Hamas smuggling weapons and Al-Qaeda terrorists into Gaza (while the PA gives tacit approval), does anybody think that Israel has a peace partner in the Middle East. I think NOT.

(23) ami, March 20, 2010 11:34 AM

please stand corrected

first, it is already stated in the article that Temple Mount is "central". Its not number game of who's first and second. Next, Israeli government already respects and protects the mosque seeing Muslims' new found interest in the Mosque. Its the Arabs who are making problems. We already have sent numerous appeasing waves and grants to local Arabs. You can't equate Arabs and Jewish locales. Both are diametrically opposite. One is blood-thirsty and his religion requires world dominance and conversions. But peace is utmost in judaism and no place for evangelism except Noahide laws. well said Carlton; Muslims are outproducing to make them highest population. But it will come back to them. Still we should stop Muslim population explosion or be ready for more bombs and threats in future!!

(22) Folke Holtz, March 19, 2010 10:56 AM

It is impossible to share the templemount.

It´s impossible to share the templemount, because the whole templemount is historicly I Jewish center. Al Aqsa in Koran is a geografic place that noone knows there it is. The Muslims will not share butonly have it all, which is the rfeal problem in all parts of so called peaceprocess. The Messiah will come and build the temple and this is what we are waiting on.

(21) :P, March 18, 2010 6:26 PM

Sharing the Temple Mount and the Western Wall

Interesting article, I liked it very much; however there is one item that is flat out wrong. The Holiest site in Judaism is the Temple Mount, not the Western Wall. The Wall is just a glorified retaining wall that King Herod built to hold the dirt in. It was most likely built on top of the first wall from the time of King Solomon, but... we don't know for sure. The ground under Al Aksah and Dome of the Rock is the Holiest site in Judaism. And a note to jm: We have been sharing that ground with the Muslims since some wacky Caliph from Turkey claimed that Mohamed’s dream about a far off land was really a place, and that place was Jerusalem...

See All Comments

Submit Your Comment:

  • Display my name?

  • Your email address is kept private. Our editor needs it in case we have a question about your comment.


  • * required field 2000
Submit Comment
stub
Sign up today!