click here to jump to start of article
Join Our Newsletter

Get latest articles and videos with Jewish inspiration and insights​




Middle East Reality Check

Middle East Reality Check

Knowing what Israel is up against and proceeding with due caution.

by

It is becoming increasingly clear that the Arab-Israeli conflict has nothing to do with a division of the land or the issue of Jewish settlements; it is essentially a war of civilizations.

The main Islamic powers, though in conflict among each other, are united in their pledge to liquidate or subjugate all “infidels,” Jews, Christians, Buddhist, Atheists – and even moderate Muslims – to create a worldwide Muslim Caliphate that is governed under Sharia Law.

Currently there are four main Islamic powers:

  • The Islamic Republic of Iran wants to establish a caliphate based upon the Shia tradition.
  • The oil-rich Saudis would like the caliphate based upon the Wahhabi (Salafii) tradition.
  • The Muslim Brotherhood, which recently took over Egypt, would like the caliphate based upon the Sunni tradition.
  • Turkey has essentially ceased being secular and is now seeking to reassert their influence on Mideast territory which used to be the Ottoman Empire.

When we look at the development of the Middle East map following the crumbling of the Ottoman Empire in World War I, many of the modern regional countries – Iraq, Kuwait, Syria, Lebanon, Yemen – were created at that time.

Following the Balfour declaration in 1917 and with the consent of the League of Nations, a small percentage of Ottoman land was designated to reestablish Jewish sovereignty in their ancestral homeland.

In 1922, due to problems in the territory of Saudi Arabia, the British violated their Mandate – confiscating about 80% of the land designated for the Jewish people, to create the Hashemite Kingdom of Trans Jordan. This was in order to separate the Hashemite family from the family of Ibn Saud, which ended up controlling Saudi Arabia.

In 1937, the Peel Commission presented new proposals for a two-state solution on the remaining 20% of the land. The Jews accepted it; the Arabs rejected it.

In 1947, the United Nations again recommended a two-state solution. Again the Jews accepted it and the Arabs rejected it.

In multiple cases of a two-state solution, the Jews accepted it and the Arabs rejected it.

When the British mandate ended on May 14, 1948, the Jewish people declared independence in the State of Israel, which was recognized by the United Nations. Arab neighbors immediately invaded Israel – not with intent to create a new Arab Palestinian State, but with the intent to destroy the Jewish state.

Fast forward to more recent history. Israel left the Gaza Strip in 2005, hoping for peace. Instead, the terrorist group Hamas, which is currently ruling Gaza, has fired thousands of rockets onto the Israeli civilian population.

The Palestinian Authority, created following the Oslo accords in 1993, remains in conflict with Hamas, and governs about 95% of the Arab Palestinian population of Judea and Samaria – the West Bank of the Jordan River.

Hamas and the Palestinian Authority continue to exploit Christians and others, continue to support terrorism with global implications, continue to deny the rights of Israel to exist, continue to educate their children that Israel should be destroyed, and continue to demonize Israel across the globe.

At this juncture, giving more power to terrorists will not bring peace. It will only embolden the radicals, to continue their plan to liquidate Israel and potentially other dangerous moves against the free world.

Moving Toward Peace

Should the Arab Palestinians desire peace, they can start by:

  • Declaring that a peace treaty will end the conflict.
  • Accept that a peace treaty will end all claims.
  • Recognize that Israel is not occupying Arab land, but that Israel is the Jewish homeland.
  • Cease denying the 4,000-year-old connection between Judaism and the Land of Israel, and acknowledge Jewish rights to live on their ancestral land.
  • Acknowledge the experience of Jewish refugees, as well as Arab Palestinian refugees.
  • Most importantly, educate their children for peace, cease all forms of anti-Israel propaganda and Holocaust denial, and dismantle all terror infrastructures.

Until then, Israel must continue to act according to its good conscious, for the benefit of all people of good will.

At the end of the day, a durable peace is definitively better than a shaky pseudo-agreement.

Published: March 9, 2013


Give Tzedakah! Help Aish.com create inspiring
articles, videos and blogs featuring timeless Jewish wisdom.

Visitor Comments: 15

(9) JOE, March 15, 2013 8:39 PM

Arab-Israeli Conflict

THis is the best definition yet, that I have seen of the conflict.
JOe.

(8) Anonymous, March 13, 2013 7:59 AM

and then what ?

After it all said and done, there is no way that an Arab and Jew can coexist. The odds of a lasting peace are 100- 0. All of the " starters " that you propose are all ' non-starters '. No Arab or Muslim will put up with a leader of peace. Ask Sadat. Ask Rabin. Ask Begin. Ask Golda. Ask Netanyahu. Obama is set to visit the Middle-East. What is not on his agenda is peace talks. What is on his agenda is Iran's nuclear weapons program.

(7) Glenn, March 13, 2013 12:31 AM

PEACE IN OUR TIME?

Islam, by it's very own doctrine and mind set is against anything Jewish!...They would prefer that Israel in fact did not exist, and it is toward that end that they use every means available to see this accomplished!...Lets be honest here, not every Muslim is a terrorist, but every terrorist is a Muslim, and there can be no peace for Israel as long as the extremists speak louder than the moderates!
G-d's promises about restoring Israel back into a Nation has come true in our lifetime, we need to look closely at other Scripture to see into the future of His plans for this Nation!

(6) Tim Upham, March 12, 2013 6:06 PM

Attitude Comes Into This

What is suppose to be chic now, and defines Jewish identity, is Jewish hatred for anything Muslim. It appalls me with how simplistic and factual incorrect it is. People will say to me "How can you say that you are Jewish, if you do not hate Muslims?" Hatred of Muslims does not fall under Halachic Law, so we should not make modern politics define what it is.

Donny, March 12, 2013 8:00 PM

@Tim

What does "hate" have to do with anything? Hate has no relevance to this article nor to your comment. It's fools like you who think because we're exposing Islamic anti-semitic world domination that we must "hate" them. That is profound stupidity. Does a weatherman "hate" the Hurricane he's warning people about?

See All Comments

Submit Your Comment:

  • Display my name?

  • Your email address is kept private. Our editor needs it in case we have a question about your comment.


  • * required field 2000
Submit Comment
stub