click here to jump to start of article
Join Our Newsletter

Get latest articles and videos with Jewish inspiration and insights​

Pandering to Genocide

Pandering to Genocide

A vulnerable Jewish professor publicly advocates the dismantling of Israel as a sovereign Jewish nation.


Reprinted with permission from Camera.

As columnist Charles Krauthammer recently observed: "The world is experiencing the worst resurgence of anti-Semitism in 50 years. Its main objective is the demonization and delegitimation of Israel, to the point that the idea of eradicating... the world's only Jewish state becomes respectable, indeed laudable. The psychological grounds for the final solution are being prepared."

Party to this grim preparation is one Tony Judt, former Oxford don and now a history professor at New York University. Accomplished in the academy, where Israel is widely vilified, he has evidently, as a Jew, suffered discomfiting criticism among his colleagues -- perhaps even at dinner parties. He doesn't appreciate this, and so publicly advocates the dismantling of Israel as a sovereign Jewish nation.

Not surprisingly, the professor's argument is an extremist diatribe filled with distortion.

In an October 10 op-ed in the Los Angeles Times and a longer version in the October 23 New York Review of Books, he terms Israel an "anachronism" to be done away with. The Jewish state is "bad for the Jews," writes Judt, explaining, "the behavior of a self-described Jewish state affects the way everyone else looks at Jews." He opines that "non-Israeli Jews feel themselves once again exposed to criticism and vulnerable for things they didn't do."

Not surprisingly, the professor's argument for the abolition of the Jewish state in favor of a bi-national one shared with the Palestinians -- an entity soon to leave Jews a minority -- is an extremist diatribe filled with distortion.

Judt parrots Palestinian allegations, charging Israel has, for example, "consistently and blatantly flouted UN resolutions requiring it to withdraw from land seized and occupied in war." But there is only one currently relevant UN resolution, 242, and that requires Israel to withdraw to negotiated "secure and recognized boundaries."

Israel has, of course, pulled back from large areas of land, including the Sinai and southern Lebanon. On the other hand, Arab states blatantly violate Resolution 242's demand that states in the region terminate "belligerency," and respect the right of "every State in the area... to live in peace within secure and recognized boundaries, free from threats or acts of force."

Judt attacks Israel as outmoded in an age of individual rights and multi-ethnicity because it is a Jewish state. Disregarding the 22 Muslim Arab states in which Islam and its hundreds of millions of adherents are given privileged status, and from which in varying degrees Jews are prohibited from owning property, praying or even setting foot, the author lambastes Israel as "a state in which Jews and the Jewish religion have exclusive privileges from which non-Jewish citizens are forever excluded." In fact, in Israel as nowhere else in the Middle East, people of all faiths live, work, vote, worship and prosper. Jews do enjoy unique access to citizenship under the Law of Return -- just as other democratic nations offer citizenship privileges to particular ethnic groups. Denmark, Finland, Italy, Greece, Poland, Germany, Mexico, Bulgaria and the Baltic and Balkan nations are just a few.

Judt is equally hypocritical about recent key events. He complains: "Israeli liberals and moderate Palestinians have for two decades been thanklessly insisting that the only hope was for Israel to dismantle nearly all the settlements and return to the 1967 borders, in exchange for real Arab recognition of those frontiers and a stable, terrorist-free Palestinian state..." Literally unmentioned are the Camp David/Taba negotiations, with their offer to dismantle settlements and return virtually to the 1967 lines -- and Palestinian rejection of statehood in favor of terror. Thus the professor is silent regarding Arab rejection of nationhood alongside the Jews.

Nor are the Arabs faulted for their "anachronistic" dictatorial regimes -- while the Jewish state is to be destroyed for its supposed imperfections.

Arafat and his associates have long advocated the "single state" solution Judt embraces, and have made clear what that would entail.

"Every Palestinian must clearly understand that the independent Palestinian state, with Jerusalem as its capital, is not the end of the process but rather a stage on the road to a democratic state in the whole of Palestine," Fatah ideologue and PA director of political indoctrination Othman Abu Gharbiya stated in November, 1999. "This will be followed by a third phase, namely Palestine's complete amalgamation in the Arab and Islamic cultural, national, historic, and geographic environment. This is the permanent-status solution."

In becoming a cheerleader for this solution, Judt offers the Jews of Israel the fate of other ethnic and religious minorities in the Arab Middle East, all of whom are beleaguered and persecuted in some degree, and in the worst cases subjected to genocidal assault. Indeed, Palestinian leaders, including PA religious figures, have repeatedly called for the annihilation of Israel.

But submitting Israel's Jews to the murderous designs of Arafat and his cronies apparently means little to Judt when weighed against the prospect of being freed in the eyes of his academic colleagues from the "guilt" by ethnic association with Israel's battle for survival.

November 1, 2003

Give Tzedakah! Help create inspiring
articles, videos and blogs featuring timeless Jewish wisdom.
The opinions expressed in the comment section are the personal views of the commenters. Comments are moderated, so please keep it civil.

Visitor Comments: 14

(14) Alex, November 21, 2003 12:00 AM

Pompus Idiot

This professor has no clue. I have just returned from Israel, and seeing things with my own eyes instead of those of a biased media improves my view on the activites of the Israeli government. Peace can only happen if both sides want it. The "palestinians" have shown time and time again that the only time they will "lay down theier arms" is when Israel is destroyed. Anyone who thinks that America relationship with the rest of the Middle East totaritarian dictatorships/theocracies, etc if Israel was no longer there has been living under a rock for the last 55 years. It is not or support of Israel and a Jewish state that "condemns" us in the minds of the all but the most moderate of Muslims, it is the freedoms which we espouse (and Israel as well) as a liberal democracy.

(13) Anonymous, November 17, 2003 12:00 AM


I just had to write. A "BI-nation"..indeed! What on earth is this nonsense. This is hysterically funny, if unfortunately people with greater ego-needs, than common sense, and REAL power were not in a position to DO something about their opiniopns.

When will someone wake up, and realize the sheer emptiness of what I call the "stupid-factor". How can Anyone take these ideas Seriously! Dismantly a DEMOCRATIC COUNTRY (Israel), because it is "felt", that Self-Defence is a Big no--no, when "victims" spout their hatred, loudly thru violence.

I lay the responsibility at the hands of those pacifiers, appeasers, and insecure parties, just Dying to "fit in". Well, People are dying all right, and they are fitting in VERY nicely into their shrouds, while their family, friends,a nd a whole people weeps in vain.

It is time that fearful individuals with some clout, get a backbone, and STAND for something. Being part of a thuggish mob, is not why we are here. We are here to ensure that Peoples EVERYWERE, and that INCLUDES Israel, and the Jewish Nation, be taken for granted as part of Creation.

To feel afraid, shows a total lack of trust, in one's own values. Pandering to fools, and nonsensical ideas, shows that the human spirit is trulky weakened, and atrophying. This is a serious lack Spiritual Valour, which needs to be addressed. The facts may not be slanted to suit faddish posturings, and cultural modes of the month.

So, there is controversy, so there is heated discussion, so there are dissenting views, SO WHAT...If people do not like you, SO WHAT.

I sincerely believe that it is time for many of us to realize that the WHOLE world can be wrong, and Is wrong. It is time to face up to the fact, that it does not matter, in the least.


Otillia de Andrade

(12) Anonymous, November 8, 2003 12:00 AM

Caving in to social pressure and assimilation

This pitiful proffesor reminds me of the lion in the Wizard of Oz,if he only had a heart and the other equipment needed by a real lion.

(11) Rex S. Rambo, November 7, 2003 12:00 AM

Tony Judt is advocating appeasement.

I can reply to professor Judt and his collegues with one word, Bullbutter.
For those who have trouble with this idiomatic expression, bullbutter, think of cattle chips.

(10) Anonymous, November 6, 2003 12:00 AM

Excellent review of an Important Threat to Israel

Exposing these gutless intellectual anti-Israel such as Tony Judt is both mandatory and tough work. We are lucky that Andrea Levin and Charles Krauthammer have the courage to challenge his statements against Israel and our right to have a Jewish state. The US Jewish Community must wake up to the anti-semitism that is occuring in our media and on our college campuses. We need to be proactive in the mainstream media to inform to our friends, our brethern and our enemies around the world that our very existence is threatened by the rising tides of Islamic radicals and those supposed Jews who are against Israel.

See All Comments

Submit Your Comment:

  • Display my name?

  • Your email address is kept private. Our editor needs it in case we have a question about your comment.

  • * required field 2000
Submit Comment