The LA Times gives op-ed space to a professor who has called for the destruction of the State of Israel.
Reuters is cited for the most biased coverage of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
No one should be permitted to deny what is perhaps the most ancient and legitimate claim of any people on any piece of land. Not even The New York Times.
A vulnerable Jewish professor publicly advocates the dismantling of Israel as a sovereign Jewish nation.
Under the guise of objectivity, the media tries to 'democratize' a corrupt and dictatorial Palestinian regime.
As Israel's prime ministers travels to Washington, observers are wondering: Did the road map take a detour?
The road map is taking a back seat to an internal Palestinian deal.
Arafat keeps his grip on the reigns of power, and appoints a Holocaust-denier to handle daily affairs.
Israel's plan to stop Palestinian violence is sensationalized by Reuters as "splitting Christ's birthplace."
CBC's Mideast correspondent instigates other reporters to join his protest.
Noam Apter's heroic act saved countless lives. Why didn't more people hear about it?
CBC's Mideast coverage is amoral, irresponsible and rife with double standards.
The British media's coverage of Jenin wins the ignoble prize for the most skewed and biased reporting on the Mideast conflict.
Dishonest reporting has made truth a casualty of the war, causing grievous damage to both Israel and the integrity of the journalistic profession.
Commentators make outlandish comparisons of democratic Israel to the world's worst dictatorial despots.
When it comes to the Middle East, the Chicago Sun-Times is a beacon of sanity.
A review of media issues relating to Sept. 11 in light of the Mideast conflict.
The Washington Post sympathizes with a Hamas leader, and Time magazine 'blames' Israel for decreasing the violence.
Israel should keep cameras away from scenes of carnage
The media tries to mop up its horrific coverage of Jenin. Some newspapers succeed.
The media tries to justify the bombing of an Israeli cafeteria as some kind of tit-for-tat.
Israel wipes out a most-wanted terrorist. Is the media reporting the whole story?
By providing statistics for the last six months only, CNN's in-depth look at the Victims of Terror ends up downplaying the true story.
CNN announces a series of major policy changes in favor of the Israeli position.
More media bias from the New York Times. This time unrelated to the Middle East.
Contemporary media bias against Israel has its spiritual roots in the biblical spy story.
Malicious and slanderous reports against Israel abound in the British press.
The Jews and their enemies today are no more morally equivalent than are the Peace Corps and Al Qaeda.
Western diplomats and journalists are legitimizing mass murder.
The method of the IDF operation in Jenin helped reduce civilian casualties. The UK media parrots Palestinian claims it was a massacre.
Instead of factual reporting, the mainstream media has placed culpability on both parties, creating a perception of equal aggression, of a 'cycle' of violence.
Suicide bombers are coming from Arafat's Fatah Al-Aqsa Brigade, even as Arafat meets with U.S. envoy Anthony Zinni to pledge his devotion to peace.
Lee Hockstader delivers page one sympathy for Palestinian combatants.
The Arab media denies reality and claims the recent capture of the cargo ship carrying 50 tons of contraband arms is an Israeli fabrication. But what else is new?
Recognizing the year's most skewed and biased reporting.
A comparison of the lives of Sharon and Arafat packs a lot of bias into 100 words.
A British journalist in Israel chronicles the shocking, systematic anti-Israel bias of the European media.
When Palestinian gunmen machine-gun Jewish shoppers, Reuters lumps the attackers' deaths together with the victims.
Some small papers join in the slander against Israel -- including an accusation of discrimination against Christians.
Harper's magazine accuses Israeli troops of murdering Palestinian children for sport.
Is Bin Laden motivated by radical Islamic teachings? Some fifth columnists say ‘no -- it's all Israel's fault.'
The terror war has gone global. How does this media coverage affect Israel?
A 3-month investigation reveals the underlying basis for Palestinian sympathies in the media.
"60 Minutes" in Australia justifies suicide bombings and denying Israel's right to self-defense.
Mass carnage of Jewish civilians is not enough for CNN to stop parroting the Palestinian line.
The world jumps on Israel for its campaign to eliminate the Hamas terrorist threat. What alternative option would they recommend pursuing?
After being denounced by the world as an obstacle to peace, Yasser Arafat is now rehabilitated by the Western media.
A vile, insulting screed from the Washington Post tries to win sympathy for the bloody-handed Ramallah lyncher.
Israel-bashing in the media: is it just coincidence, or are there other factors driving this trend?
When a Palestinian commits pre-meditated murder against an Israeli at point-blank range, CNN merely says that a 'gunfight broke out.'