click here to jump to start of article
Join Our Newsletter

Get latest articles and videos with Jewish inspiration and insights​




Anti-Semitism in 3D

Anti-Semitism in 3D

Differentiating legitimate criticism of Israel from the so-called new anti-Semitism.

by

Last week I took part in a conference on anti-Semitism in Europe. Hosted by the president of the European Commission Romano Prodi, the conference brought together leaders from around the world determined to fight the new wave of anti-Semitism that has engulfed Europe over the last few years.

The question is how the sincere intentions of the participants to combat this evil can be translated into effective action.

My experience has convinced me that moral clarity is critical in taking a stand against evil. Evil cannot be defeated if it cannot be recognized, and the only way to recognize evil is to draw clear moral lines. Evil thrives when those lines are blurred, when right and wrong is a matter of opinion rather than objective truth.

That is what makes the battle against the so-called new anti-Semitism so difficult.

To the free world's modern eyes, classical anti-Semitism is easily discernible. If we watch films that show Jews draining the blood of Gentile children or plotting to take over the world, most of us would immediately recognize it as anti-Semitism.

Such movies, produced recently by the government-controlled media in Egypt and Syria and broadcast via satellite to hundreds of millions of Muslims around the world, including millions of Muslim immigrants in Western Europe, employ motifs and canards that are familiar to us.

But the new anti-Semitism is far more subtle. Whereas classical anti-Semitism was seen as being aimed at the Jewish religion or the Jewish people, the new anti-Semitism is ostensibly directed against the Jewish state. Since this anti-Semitism can hide behind the veneer of legitimate criticism of Israel, it is much more difficult to expose.

In fact, over the past year, whenever we have criticized particularly virulent anti-Israel statements as being rooted in anti-Semitism, the response has invariably been that we are trying to stifle legitimate criticism of Israel by deliberately labeling it anti-Semitism.

What emerged from this conference was an admission by European leaders themselves that not all criticism of Israel is legitimate. This recognition was evident in the remarks of President Romano Prodi, German Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer and other officials.

If not all criticism is valid, how then do we define the boundary line?

I propose the following test for differentiating legitimate criticism of Israel from anti-Semitism. The 3D test, as I call it, is not a new one. It merely applies to the new anti-Semitism the same criteria that for centuries identified the different dimensions of classical anti-Semitism.

DEMONIZATION

The first D is the test of demonization.

Whether it came in the theological form of a collective accusation of deicide or in the literary depiction of Shakespeare's Shylock, Jews were demonized for centuries as the embodiment of evil. Therefore, today we must be wary of whether the Jewish state is being demonized by having its actions blown out of all sensible proportion.

For example, the comparisons of Israelis to Nazis and of the Palestinian refugee camps to Auschwitz -- comparisons heard practically every day within the "enlightened" quarters of Europe -- can only be considered anti-Semitic.

Those who draw such analogies either do not know anything about Nazi Germany or, more plausibly, are deliberately trying to paint modern-day Israel as the embodiment of evil.

DOUBLE STANDARDS

The second D is the test of double standards. For thousands of years a clear sign of anti-Semitism was treating Jews differently than other peoples, from the discriminatory laws many nations enacted against them to the tendency to judge their behavior by a different yardstick.

While criticism of an Israeli policy may not be anti-Semitic, the denial of Israel's right to exist is always anti-Semitic.

Similarly, today we must ask whether criticism of Israel is being applied selectively. In other words, do similar policies by other governments engender the same criticism, or is there a double standard at work?

It is anti-Semitism, for instance, when Israel is singled out by the United Nations for human rights abuses while tried and true abusers like China, Iran, Cuba, and Syria are ignored.

Likewise, it is anti-Semitism when Israel's Magen David Adom, alone among the world's ambulance services, is denied admission to the International Red Cross.

DELIGITIMIZATION

The third D is the test of deligitimization. In the past, anti-Semites tried to deny the legitimacy of the Jewish religion, the Jewish people, or both. Today, they are trying to deny the legitimacy of the Jewish state, presenting it, among other things, as the last vestige of colonialism.

While criticism of an Israeli policy may not be anti-Semitic, the denial of Israel's right to exist is always anti-Semitic. If other peoples have a right to live securely in their homelands, then the Jewish people have a right to live securely in their homeland.

To remember the 3D test I suggest we recall those 3D movies we enjoyed as children. Without those special glasses the movie was flat and blurred. But when we put on our glasses the screen came alive, and we saw everything with perfect clarity.

In the same way, if we do not wear the right glasses, the line between legitimate criticism of Israel and anti-Semitism will be blurred and we will not be able to recognize this ancient evil, much less fight it.

But if we wear the special glasses provided by the 3D test -- if we check whether Israel is being demonized or deligitimized, or whether a double standard is being applied to it -- we will always be able to see anti-Semitism clearly.

And with moral clarity, I have no doubt that our efforts to combat this evil will prove far more effective.

For more on this topic, see "Identifying the New Anti-Semitism" by Irwin Cotler.

Published: February 23, 2004


Give Tzedakah! Help Aish.com create inspiring
articles, videos and blogs featuring timeless Jewish wisdom.

Visitor Comments: 23

(21) Beverly KurtiiIt, June 3, 2013 3:56 AM

It is Israel's fault

Israel ignored the fact that the Arabs were building a massive PR group around the world. They did not block the propaganda that the Arabs got going, making up lies..."Big Lies" which were repeated over and over and over again, just like the Nazis who taught the Arabs all of the Nazi tricks.

Israel kept relatively quiet. I feel that they figured that people would be intelligent enough to know that they were lying.

Well, they were wrong. I know now that Israel has their PR people, but it is WAY too late, the BIG LIES are sticking.

Being only ONE Jew, I fight the lies every chance I get. I LOATH it when people tell me how horrible Israel is. Rather than talk to them, I show them videos that tell the truth. I grab them from Aish, Honest Reporting, and a few other sites.

Jew-hate has been around since the git-go of our people; every Jew needs to know the truth and fight it. Each Jew ought to be part of the public relations for Israel.

(20) Anonymous, April 11, 2004 12:00 AM

What is idolatry

I say I can live with the though of G"d in the heaven my problem is to survive with the false G"d on earth, who break the rules of the 10 commandments that we should not serve idols and in our dealing with our fellow man we are serving idols if we try to exercise power over others. The second lot of the 10 commandments each specify a power over another human being by the person breaking any of the commandments only belief in G"d and the shabbath and honouring our parents is allowed as not being idol worship. We ourselves are the idols if we exercise power over another human being.
Truth consists of facts not of biased truth and any indoctrination is an exercise of idolatry and in my view that is why we Jews have freedon of choice

(19) jennifer, March 21, 2004 12:00 AM

dear Iris

This is exactly the point. It is the historical inaccuracy that is frustrating and disrespectful, I think.
In no way did I see evidence of the Jewishness of Jesus, nor the spiritual enlightenment of the post-Hillel Rabbinic era in the religious leaders. I just think it is a sad and unfair depiction of the religion. Even if it is verbatim NT.

(18) Iris, March 20, 2004 12:00 AM

In support of Pastor Eaves

As a Jew who has seen the movie "The Passion" I must agree on the whole with what Pastor Eaves wrote in his message. The focus of the movie was not the Jews or their behavior. They were merely the catalysts for something which Christians believe had to take place. I admit that I was uncomfortable hearing the High Priest saying what he said and I know that this is in the New Testament and that classical Anti-Semitism was to a large extent based upon these words in the New Testament, but Mel Gibson's emphasis in the movie was not on this aspect of the story. He was merely trying to be loyal to the text which he reveres. Were there not also Jews in the movie (and the book) who loved, supported and aided Jesus? His mother was Jewish, Mary Magdaleen was Jewish, etc. Basically everyone in the story other than the Romans, was Jewish. Taking it to its logical (but absurd)extreme we can say that the N.T. is pro-Jewish since most if not all of the apostles were Jewish and that, of course, Jesus himself was Jewish. I take issue with the people who wrote the New Testament because I believe that they altered the truth in order to "get in good" with the powers that be of that age - the Roman empire, which did eventually become officially Christian. They had to name another villain for their story so they put the blame on the Jews. All this being said, most true Christians one encounters in the U.S. today are vigorously pro-Israel, sometimes even more so than the Jews. The majority of tourists from this country to Israel, I believe, are Christians. The Christians I know believe that "He who blesses the Jews will be blessed and that he who curses the Jews will be cursed." I don't even care that much if they have some sort of ulterior motive for helping Jews and Israel, since I do not believe in their theology. What I care about is the continuing support of Israel by the United States which people like Pastor Eaves help bring about.

If one goes to see a movie like "The Passion" with the agenda of finding Anti-Semitism, one certainly will find it but one will be seeing the forest for the trees. The priests who were urging the Romans to crucify Jesus (again probably not historically accurate since Jews did not believe in crucifixion and since so many Jews were being crucified by the Romans) were only a small portion of the population. When we see Jesus being scourged by the Romans, the priests really don't seem to be enjoying it and there are people in the crowd who pity Jesus and try to help him. Also, there is one priest who chastises the others for calling a gathering at an inappropriate time and says that the proceedings are not legitimate. Are not these people also Jews?

I have a feeling that many Jews are avoiding the movie and therefore can't really comment upon it accurately. I truly hope and pray that there is not an increase in Anti-Semitism in Europe as a result of this movie since Anti-Semitism is already on the rise in nations such as France and I certainly don't want to see this increase. I do not believe that this will happen in this country where Christians try to live out the true meaning of their religion. It is more than tragic - I truly can't find the words - that in the part of the world where the Holocaust took place, people are hating Jews just for being Jewish once again. Perhaps they are not being educated in their schools as our children are about the horror of that period.

All I can conclude with is that as a Jew I did not leave the movie theatre thinking about Jew hatred and I heard no comments of that kind. Still, I admit that I worry about the effect the movie will have world wide. Anyone going into the theatre looking for Anti-Semitism will find it and anyone going into the theatre looking for a reason to add to his hatred of Jews will also find it.

Beverly Kurtin, June 3, 2013 4:17 AM

Yup, sure, you're permitted to think that way

Mel Gibson is a Jew hater just like is father. Although I have not and will not go see the movie, what I did see was about as antisemitic as one can get. The movie had the Sanhedrin meeting on PASSOVER? Sorry, I do not believe that Jesus was important for then to even take notice. Gibson went to extremes to show blood squirting all over the place. He did not bother to follow his book. The "New" Testament is something that I have read in the Greek and various English versions. Never mind that Christianity ignores the words of Jesus who said that the laws were still intact and would be until the end of the world. Paul was the guy who started gentile Christianity because the Jews tossed him out of their synagogues; Jesus was not the messiah and they knew it; the gentiles did not know a thing about Judaism and what it taught, so they had no idea of what the messiah was supposed to accomplish. Jesus did not fulfill what he was supposed to do. Now one of the things that bothers me is that the first "Gospel" was not written until about 70 years after Jesus' execution by the Romans for the crime of sedition. His followers called him the King of the Jews, but Cesar was the King, so... How in the world did anyone know what was said? Supposing that the apostles were about 30 when Jesus was executed, they would be around 100. Now let me ask you what you had for lunch two weeks ago? You don't recall, do you? So how in the dickens did anyone know what Jesus said 70 years ago? Much of what he did say was from Tenach, but apart from those quotes, how did someone about 100 years old remember anything that was said? Answer: They didn't Much of the Jew hate is based on BIG LIES that have been repeated for a couple of thousand years. There is no "new" testament as Hashem make an ETERNAL covenant with Abraham and the world still is intact.

See All Comments

Submit Your Comment:

  • Display my name?

  • Your email address is kept private. Our editor needs it in case we have a question about your comment.


  • * required field 2000
Submit Comment
stub