click here to jump to start of article
Join Our Newsletter

Get latest articles and videos with Jewish inspiration and insights​




Why Jews Are Worried

Why Jews Are Worried

The renowned historian on the rising anti-Semitism in Europe.

by

An old Jewish joke goes like this: “What’s the definition of a Jewish telegram? ‘Start worrying. Details to follow.’ ”

I am often asked by fellow Jews about contemporary manifestations of anti-Semitism, particularly in Europe. “Is this just like 1939? Are we on the cusp of another Holocaust?” Until now, my answer has been an unequivocal “no.” I have criticized community leaders who, either out of genuine concern or to advance their own purposes, use Holocaust analogies to describe contemporary conditions. These claims are ahistorical. They overstate what is going on now and completely understate the situation in 1939.

The differences between then and now are legion. When there is an outbreak of anti-Semitism today, officials condemn it. This is light-years away from the 1930s and 1940s, when governments were not only silent but complicit. Memory also distinguishes the present from previous events. Now, in contrast to the 1930s, we know matters can escalate. Jews today are resolute in their determination: “Never again.”

And despite all this I wonder if I am too sanguine. Last month, pro-Gaza protesters on Kurfürstendamm, the legendary avenue in Berlin, chanted, “Jews, Jews, cowardly swine.” Demonstrators in Dortmund and Frankfurt chanted, “Hamas, Hamas; Jews to the gas!” And a pro-Hamas marcher in Berlin broke away from the crowd and assaulted an older man who was quietly standing on a corner holding an Israeli flag.

On the eve of Bastille Day, a group of Parisian Jews were trapped in a synagogue by pro-Palestinian rioters and had to be rescued by the police. A few weeks ago signs were posted in Rome urging a boycott of 50 Jewish-owned businesses. In central London last week, anti-Israel protesters targeted a Sainsbury’s grocery, and the manager reflexively pulled kosher products off the shelves. (The supermarket chain later apologized.)

It would be simple to link all this outrage to events in Gaza. But this trend has been evident for a while. In March 2012, four people were killed at a Jewish day school in Toulouse, France. (Last month, a Jewish community center there was firebombed.) In December 2012, Israeli officials warned Jewish men who wanted to visit synagogues in Denmark not to don their skullcaps until they were inside the building. It is increasingly common for Jewish tourists in Western Europe to avoid carrying anything that might distinguish them as such. A shooting at the Jewish Museum in Brussels in May, a month before the latest Gaza conflict began, killed four people.

I am unpersuaded by those who try to dismiss what is happening as “just rhetoric.” It is language, after all, that’s at the heart of the ubiquitous slippage from anger at Israeli military action to hatred of Jews.

Nor am I comforted by the explanation that these actions are being taken by “disgruntled Muslim youth.” (By one estimate, 95 percent of anti-Semitic actions in France are committed by youths of Arab or African descent.) Many of these Muslims were born in Europe, and many of those who weren’t are the parents of a new generation of Europeans.

In the past century a distinct strain of Muslim anti-Semitism has emerged.

It’s true that this is not the anti-Semitism of the 1930s, which came from the right and was rooted in longstanding Christian views that demonized the Jews. Traditionally, Islam did not treat Jews this way. But in the past century a distinct strain of Muslim anti-Semitism has emerged. Built on a foundation of antipathy toward non-Muslims, it mixes Christian anti-Semitism — imported to the Middle East by European missionaries — and a more leftist, secular form of anti-Semitism. It is evident in political cartoons, editorials, television shows and newspaper articles.

The Hamas charter is an example. It contains references to “The Protocols of the Elders of Zion,” a notorious forgery created by Russian czarist police officers in 1903 and later used as Nazi propaganda. The charter accuses Jews of relying on secret societies to foment global economic and political disasters. It calls on adherents to prepare for “the next round with the Jews, the merchants of war.”

The rationales — “it’s just rhetoric,” “it’s just Muslims” — bother me almost as much as the outrages. Instead of explaining away these actions, cultural, religious and academic leaders in all the countries where these events have occurred should be shaken to the core, not just about the safety of their Jewish neighbors, but about the future of the seemingly liberal, enlightened societies they belong to. Yet when a Hamas spokesman recently stood by his statement that Jews used the blood of non-Jewish children for their matzos — one of the oldest anti-Semitic canards around — European elites were largely silent.

Seventy years after the Holocaust, many Jews in Europe no longer feel safe. Hiring an armed guard to protect people coming for weekly prayer is not the action of a secure people. In too many cities worldwide, directions to the local synagogue conclude with, “You will recognize it by the police car in front of the building.” France has seen a sharp rise in the number of Jews who have decided to emigrate (though the figures are still fairly small).

The telegram has arrived. Jews are worrying. It is time for those who value a free, democratic, open, multicultural and enlightened society to do so, too. This is not another Holocaust, but it’s bad enough.

This op-ed originally appeared in The New York Times.

Published: August 24, 2014


Give Tzedakah! Help Aish.com create inspiring
articles, videos and blogs featuring timeless Jewish wisdom.

Visitor Comments: 36

(29) Anonymous, September 1, 2014 2:28 PM

The main difference between now and then is that we have Israel! And not only that, we have the ability to defend ourselves and protect ourselves. He said European Jews are immigrating. But he never said to where and he never said why.. Which in my opinion is the most important discussion to be having if we are supposedly "worried".

(28) Anonymous, August 29, 2014 5:23 PM

It's Not Another Holocaust - Yet...

Smoke is a warning. It it is ignored, it ignites into a fire that, considering prevailing winds, control can easily be lost. Hate spreads like a smoke. Insidious because most people do not believe, nor understand, the threat of smoke. Until the fire is blazing out of control, then they wonder how it got to that point.

The Holocaust did not happen overnight. And for several years Hitler was opposed by other political, ethical and moral factions/populations. Until one day he wasn't.

The Holocaust can happen again.

It can happen again, because Holocaust 'deniers' aren't just anti-Semites. Jews of 1939 could never in their wildest imaginations conjured the horrors of what lay ahead at the end of the train tracks. They were in denial then. Are they in denial now?

How bad does it have to get, to get the attention of people who should be 'listening'?

If it has to get that bad, it might be too late this time around too.

(27) sarahrachel, August 27, 2014 12:13 AM

So Surprised She Doesn't Understand It

I would have thought with her ability for digging up details and the truth of matters, she would have long understood that there is no such thing as a "Palestian" and that Yassir Arafat invented them FOR the purposes of destroying Israel from the inside.

Her statement here: "It would be simple to link all this outrage to events in Gaza. But this trend has been evident for a while."

shows she has no clue that the Arabs in Gaza masquerading as "Palestinians" have BEEN masquerading as "Palestinians" since the 1960s and that moving into Gaza was only one more step along in their plan to destroy Israel. They aren't doing it alone, of course, they have been backed by the entire world in everything they do against Israel.

The other question is, why is Israel pretending that "Palestinians" exist, negotiates with them, gives them land including Gaza to turn into a terrorist base to use against Israel, and acts like this imaginary "people" have a legitimate claim to the land.

I challenge Ms. Lipstadt to put her analytical mind to work on digging up the truth about the so-called "Palestinians" the same way she did to prove the Holocaust happened.

(26) John, August 26, 2014 4:28 PM

Go HOME!

I have begun to believe in only one thing today. The FULL restoration of Israel's territory, and a Jewish world migration home. Why stay in areas where you are not loved, and treated like human beings as G-d intended. Why put up with it, and continue the diaspora of an entire race of people? Go home Jews, and be happy again. It's what your/our loving G-d wants of you.

(25) Albert Hache, August 26, 2014 2:57 AM

The problem with denial is that the denier denies that he lives in denial.

Better be worried, even with a touch of paranoia, than be caught unaware. Living in denial has dangerous consequences.
Many European Jews could have been saved during WWII had they taken seriously the signs forewarning them of the Nazi’s murderous intentions. Yet, not even their openly declared targets could bring themselves to believe in the absolute horrors that were to be perpetrated against them. They lived in denial simply because it’s an excruciating decision to suddenly leave the comfort of one’s existence, with wife and children, for a life of perilous wandering and constant insecurity, being hunted like a beast. Facing such a dilemma one may understandably prefer to surrender to one’s fate and hope for the best, against all evidence.
‘Radical Islam’ is likewise clearly advertising its evil intentions towards Jews and ‘Dhimmis’, yet few in the West are prepared to believe that these threats are meant to be to put into effect. Israel is at the forefront of the war against this scourge, yet even its other intended victims, the non-Muslims of the free world, live in denial and support the local representatives of Radical-Islam against Israel.
There is nothing to be worried about, of course, provided you carry a big stick and prepare for the worse. “Un home averti en vaut deux” as they say in French. Forewarned is forearmed. Better safe than sorry.

See All Comments

Submit Your Comment:

  • Display my name?

  • Your email address is kept private. Our editor needs it in case we have a question about your comment.


  • * required field 2000
Submit Comment
stub