| |||
|
|
In the aftermath of the bloody carnage on campus unparalleled in American history, politicians may turn this into a plebiscite about gun control. Far more pertinent is the problem of God control: How could a benevolent deity have looked on passively and permitted an act that horrified all of us who heard about it? As a friend of mine put it so powerfully, "If God really runs the world, what happened at Virginia Tech proves He ought to be sued for malpractice!" Harsh words indeed. But what is our response to acts so heinous we cannot conceive of any Higher Power permitting them to happen? Why was God in hiding? Where was His hand when a Professor who survived the holocaust demonstrated heroism by choosing death as a means of saving his students? Could not God too find a way to intervene to save at least some of the 32 victims? As we watched the events of that horrifying Monday unfold I was sure no one could be unmindful of the remarkable synchronicity. The day had special meaning for us in yet another powerful way. This of course was Yom Hashoah, the commemoration of the Holocaust and its six million victims. Then and now, for the genocidal Nazis and for the suicidal student, it is the silence of God in the face of evil that most perplexes us. Why does God allow unimaginable iniquity? The theological problem demands an answer. And as hard as it is to accept we must ultimately grasp that God's seeming indifference is in fact an expression of His greatest gift to mankind. Let me explain. God created us in His image. What does that mean? He intended us to be like Him -- masters of our own fate, deciders of our destiny. God gave us the ability to choose between doing good or evil.
God loves us -- and to love somebody means letting that person be himself or herself. The name for that gift which He gave humankind so that we could be ourselves is free will. Without that freedom to choose, we would be no more than puppets acting out a script not of our choosing. God wanted more for us. So God gave us the free will that could make us greater than angels -- or more evil than Satan. Yes, sometimes there are things that happen in the world that profoundly upset the Almighty. But He allows them to happen nevertheless. Indeed He must often restrain Himself. For if God were to always interfere to prevent us from going against His will we would never be capable of really doing good, because we would simply be powerless to commit its alternative! The very fact that God gave us a commandment, "Thou shalt not murder" shows that we have the choice to obey or to violate it. God warns us not to and reminds us that the consequences of such an act will be very severe, but if a person decides to murder another human being, he may very well succeed. It is not God's will. It is the evil choice of man. But it is God's will that man's choices bear fruit even if death is the outcome. Consider the first murder in history. It was Cain the wicked who killed Abel the righteous. And where was God? God was the heavenly observer who permitted the free-will act that infuriated Him - and then declared the divine punishment. And what about poor Abel? Where was justice for the victim? The problem would be unanswerable if this world was the only place reward and punishment could find expression. The wrongs of this earth are rectified by a Ruler who has infinity to undo the effects of crimes committed during a lifetime. Martyrs who have suffered on earth merit eternal blessings. According to the teachings of Kabbalah, those who died before their time may be granted another opportunity at life -- just as Abel returned once more as none other then Moses. God is powerful enough and certainly wise enough to find ways to set right the unfair consequences of man's misuse of free will. So God was in Virginia Tech. And it should give us some comfort to know that God also wept with us. His silence was far from indifference; it was absolutely necessary by the very nature of the great gift He shares with us -- the freedom to act in accord with our will. Faith allows us to empathize with the Almighty as He mourns the consequences of His willingness to let us choose our actions. And faith gives us the strength to move on in the knowledge that those for whom we mourn will enjoy God's everlasting kindness and compassion.
Published: Sunday, April 22, 2007
If you would like to receive "Spirituality" or other features via e-mail, please enter you email address here:
|
|
If you would like to receive "Spirituality" or other features via e-mail, please enter you email address here:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
His wording for this article was helpful to me and I
learned from it. We know Hashem is everywhere, and
somehow we "expect" Him to intervene when man's
intention is to do evil onto others. This article
reinforces the notion that man has free will and it is
that free will that Hashem permits us to always have
and maintain, regardless of its outcome. So where
does the responsibility belong to somehow prevent such
an occurrence? Personally, with my "20-20 hindsight",
I believe other people involved with the murderer, way
before his terrible evil act took place, should have
done more in the way of psychologically helping him,
and/or taken more drastic measures to prevent him from
even attending the college. Perhaps too, most people
are more trusting than they should be, and the
security has to tightened and highly maintained
everywhere; as at airports, so too especially at
educational institutions in the US and around the world.
(2) Joel 5/12/2007 6:21:00 PM
One about their choice
It is very challenging when I read an article like the one above. Why you may ask, well let me tell you. The Rabbi does not explain at all what happened to the free choice the 32 human beings had? I am pretty sure they didn't want to die in a hail of evil bullets held by a mentally unbalance person.
It is so simplified when you use the balance of Good and Evil. i have talked with some of the very learned Rabbi's and even they do not fully understand the going on in a situation like this and where is G-D's role. So please do not again simplify it, to make everything come out like a Rose when really we or most of us are trying to just working with the the thorns and how to smooth them out so it doesn't hurt so much.
(3) Scott 5/11/2007 8:36:00 AM
Yes Virginia, there is a Santa Claus
According to Blech:
"Yes, sometimes there are things that happen in the world that profoundly upset the Almighty. But He allows them to happen nevertheless. Indeed He must often restrain Himself. For if God were to always interfere to prevent us from going against His will we would never be capable of really doing good, because we would simply be powerless to commit its alternative!"
and
"So God was in Virginia Tech. And it should give us some comfort to know that God also wept with us. His silence was far from indifference; it was absolutely necessary by the very nature of the great gift He shares with us -- the freedom to act in accord with our will."
As I read the article again, I thought to myself, where have I read this before. And then I remembered – a famous and oft re-printed essay From the Editorial Page of The New York Sun, written by Francis P. Church, September 21, 1897 excerpted here:
"Yes, Virginia, there is a Santa Claus. He exists as certainly as love and generosity and devotion exist. … Alas! how dreary would be the world if there were no Santa Claus! … There would be no child-like faith then, no poetry, no romance to make tolerable this existence.
"Not believe in Santa Claus! You might as well not believe in fairies! You might get your papa to hire men to watch in all the chimneys on Christmas eve to catch Santa Claus, but even if you did not see Santa Claus coming down, what would that prove? Nobody sees Santa Claus, but that is no sign that there is no Santa Claus. "
So, if it makes people feel better to believe that God or Santa Claus help people feel the world nicer, and to ignore actual horrors, so be it. I think that believing a fact, despite all evidence to the contrary, just because it makes you feel better is more often than not destructive. It may make me feel better to "believe" that it won't rain on my picnic this weekend, but it would be wiser to check the weather reports (and bring an umbrella if indicated).
Can someone explain to me how Blech's argument and the famous "Santa Claus" piece differ in any way?