The Guiding Light Parshat Bo: Thinking
click here to jump to start of article
Join Our Newsletter

Get latest articles and videos with Jewish inspiration and insights​




Bo(Exodus 10:1-13:16)

Thinking

One of the most distinctive aspects of the Ten Plagues was the persistent refusal of Pharaoh to recognize the error of his ways and accept that the God of the Jews was indeed all-powerful. Miracle after miracle failed to persuade him of the veracity of Moses' claims of being God's messenger and not merely an expert sorcerer.

During the first five plagues he refused to release the Jews while in full control of his free will. In the second five plagues he would have sent the Jews out of Egypt had God not hardened his heart. The Seforno explains, however, that this does not mean that the plagues caused Pharaoh to repent from a recognition of God's greatness. Rather his inability to bear any more plagues would have been the cause of permitting the Jews to leave. Accordingly, God's hardening of his heart gave him to strength to overcome his natural fear and make a 'reasoned' free will decision to continue to refuse Moses' requests.(1)

Pharaoh's seemingly superhuman stubbornness aroused great wonderment in Rav Aaron Bakst, Rosh Yeshiva of Lomza. He used to give a class in his home every Friday night after the meal. On one occasion his students entered his house and were surprised to see him walking back and forth in his room, speaking to himself, "What was Pharaoh thinking when he saw these great miracles in front of his very eyes?!" Suddenly, he stopped walking, turned to the students and explained, "He did not think at all! Only through lack of thinking can a person come to ignore such great miracles without allowing them to influence him in the slightest!" (2)

This explanation of Pharaoh's illogical behavior sheds great light on why people fail to change when they experience great events. They may even recognize that miracles have occurred but they do not think about their consequences.

An example of this was people's reaction to the open miracles of the Gulf War in which 39 scud missiles succeeded in killing just one person.(3) Many people acknowledged that the nation had clearly witnessed then hand of God. Yet, they did not necessarily act upon their newfound realization of Divine Providence. One may ask, what were such people thinking? They had clearly seen God's hand in protecting the Jewish people and yet they didn't change. The answer is found in Rav Bakst's explanation: they did not think. Had one sincerely reflected on the remarkable events, he would have surely changed in some way.

Another striking illustration of this phenomenon is told over by Rav Dovid Kaplan. Rav Yehcehzkel Levensteil was traveling in a taxi with a non-religious driver. The driver turned to Rav Yechezkel and told him the following remarkable story: Several years earlier, he had been traveling in the jungles of Africa with some friends. Suddenly, a snake attacked one of them, wrapping its large body around him, causing him to suffocate. After concerted efforts to save him, they realized that there was no hope, so they told him to say the Shema before he left the world. He quickly said it and immediately the snake uncurled itself and left. This man was profoundly affected by this event, and gradually returned to Judaism and he was now a fully observant Jew. After hearing how this even so drastically changed the friend's life, Rav Levenstein turned to the driver and asked him why he had not changed as a result of this miracle. The driver explained, "Oh no, it didn't happen to me, it happened to him." (4)

The driver saw a potentially life-changing event but did not change. Why? Because he did not think, he did not let the obvious consequences of this miracle cause him to reflect on his life direction. It is also instructive to note that his friend, the subject of the miracle, did change - sometimes an event can be so powerful that a person cannot help but think about it and allow it to influence his life. However, often, we ourselves are not the subject of the miracle and therefore it requires far more conscious effort to force ourselves to 'think' about the ramifications of events that we see and hear about.

The first stage of changing as a result of the world around us is to learn the lesson of Pharaoh and to 'think' - to let events that happen in the world at large, and that occur in our own private lives, cause us to reflect on our lives, and make necessary changes. May we all merit to think about that which happens around us.

 

NOTES

1. Seforno, Va'eira, 9:12, 35; Bo, 10:1.

2. Quoted in 'Mishluchan Gavoa,' Parshas Bo, p.70.

3. In the same war, a single scud missile in Saudi Arabia succeeded in killing dozens of people.

4. Kaplan, Impact, p.85.

 

Published: January 2, 2011

Give Tzedakah! Help Aish.com create inspiring
articles, videos and blogs featuring timeless Jewish wisdom.

Visitor Comments: 3

(3) Jong, January 3, 2014 7:08 PM

Not thinking is a universal trend

If we do think, a change should be inevitable, but constant exposure to the external stimulation somehow makes us numb to the all miracles and consequences. This is why we commit the same mistakes over and over again and stay same without growth. Another great insight Rabbi. Thank you so much.

(2) Yehonasan Gefen, January 11, 2011 8:55 PM

Reply to Andy's comments

Thank you Andy for your comments - I appreciate your taking the time to read my essay and comment on it. I'd like to respond to what you wrote. Your title stated that my great story about the scuds was "not at all similar" to the plagues - I strongly beg to differ as I will explain. You later wrote that it was a bit Hutzpah of me to claim that ALL those who do not believe that God intervenes in human affairs are guilty of not thinking. In truth, I never wrote that ALL those who do not believe are guilty of not thinking. I was clearly merely discussing one kind of reaction to miracles - that of not attempting to think about them at all. I have no doubt that there are serious thinkers on both sides of the 'God' debate but I was not addressing that issue at all. I was focussing on people who admit they see miracles and often even admit (or would admit if pushed) that what happenned is beyond nature, and yet, apparently fo rno reason at all, they refuse to react and think about the ramifications of what happenned. You further wrote that I should not assume that those blessed with my clarity are guilty of lack of effort to achieve it. I am not assuming anything, rather passing over the tradition given over by great Rabbinic thinkers - with regard to this particular issue of people who see miracles and do not change even without rationalizing that no miracles took place. I hope that clarifies what I wrote.

(1) Andy, January 7, 2011 1:07 PM

while great story re scuds and snake not at all similar to the plagues

it seem to me big hutzpah to claim that all those who do not believe that God intervenes in human affairs are guilty of not thinking. The issue appears to be more copmplex and there are serious thinkers on both sides of the question re God.With respect, if you are blessed with such clarity do not assume that those who do not share this clarity are guilty of a lack of effort to achieve it. It's a mistake to confuse your gifts for your accomplishments

Submit Your Comment:

  • Display my name?

  • Your email address is kept private. Our editor needs it in case we have a question about your comment.


  • * required field 2000
Submit Comment
stub