click here to jump to start of article
Join Our Newsletter

Get latest articles and videos with Jewish inspiration and insights​

Naso(Numbers 4:21-7:89)

Permission to Protect

Have you ever met permissive parents -- the ones that worship the concept of "openness" so much that they don't mind exposing their kids to just about anything? "After all", they claim, "We teach our kids proper values, it doesn't really matter what the kids see or hear. Kids should be allowed to look into 'the real world' so they don't become naive. They'll simply reject foreign ideas antithetical to proper values."

Are these parents correct? Of course, not. A Rashi in this week's Torah portion, Nasso, tells us why.

"Why was the section of the nazarite laws placed next to the laws of sotah, the suspected adulterous wife? To tell us that anyone who sees the sotah in her disgrace, should abstain from wine(one of the nazarite laws), since wine leads to adultery." (Rashi, Bamidbar 6:2)

The common question on this Rashi is that we would have thought the opposite. Wouldn't someone who sees a sinner, like the sotah, being humiliated, become inspired to not dare come close to transgression? If you saw your co-worker being yelled at for coming late, wouldn't you be extra careful not to come late yourself? So why does the Torah suggest that witnessing the sotah's embarrassment will make you more afraid that you'll sin? Why would one establish safeguards to avoid sin by refraining from wine, once he has seen a violation of the Torah in the sotah woman?

The answer is that our preconceived notion is not true. In reality, witnessing sin, no matter if we see the sinner being degraded or not, weakens our spirituality. Whenever someone "breaks the rules" in school, inevitably the rules become less hallowed and it's only a matter of time until "breaking the rules" becomes the rule. So too with the Torah. While God's "rules" and mitzvot will never cease, witnessing a breach in them automatically removes levels of respect and awe that we have for His commandments. We subconsciously feel that the transgression is no longer an untouchable and although we may never dream of doing it, it becomes a possibility. Once the slippery slope of possibility has been opened, terrible results will inevitably occur.

This is why Rabbi Moshe Feinstein writes (Igrot Moshe, Yoreh Deah 1:156) that just as it is a mitzvah to see and be involved in a mitzvah, so too it is a transgression to witness a transgression being performed where one can avoid it. By watching a violation of God's Torah, he writes, you are watching God being humiliated and disrespected. And this negatively affects your own service of God because, on some level, you lose respect for God as well.

So the nazir decides to enter the institution of the nazarite vows because he has seen the sinning sotah. He realizes that he temporarily needs special laws of holiness in order to return to his former state of awe for God's laws and commandments which have been breached.

Environment and nurture play vital roles in human development. There is no way of denying this fact. As Maimonides states (paraphrased): "It is the way of humankind to be drawn after the manners and actions of friends and countrymen. Therefore, one should connect with and befriend righteous people in order to learn from their ways and to distance oneself from wicked people." Maimonides uncharacteristically does not bring a source from a verse in the Torah as a proof. It is a simple fact of life.

What is not widely realized though is that anything and everything we see and experience becomes part of our nature. If we allow our kids to watch television and movies without any restraints, we open them up to potentially harmful influences. As Nicholas Johnson, former commissioner of the U.S. Federal Communications Commission, once said, "All television is educational. The question is what does it teach?"

It is clear that the high increase among children of sexual promiscuousness and activity, violence and guns in schools, and the trend of reduced achievement and intelligence have its roots in the effects of television and movies. (See Lawrence Keleman's 'To Kindle a Soul' for detailed scientific studies and research.)

So much for openness in parenting. It is an experiment that has failed miserably. If we are responsible parents we must try our best to shield bad influences from our kids as much as possible. They should not witness thousands of killings and violence on TV year after precious year in their youth. If they are allowed to, they will lose sensitivity toward hurting others and become more vicious people.

What we see becomes part of us. We must try to avoid exposing our children to the evils of the world. Society recognizes that the 'movie ratings system' for kids is a positive thing. Although, as a result of the moral descent of this country, what used to be a relatively acceptable and tame PG rating, now probably is the equivalent of a severe 'R' rating, there are still some things that we deem inappropriate for children.

What we should be asking ourselves is: if we agree that it is inappropriate for children, why is it any more appropriate for us? We must be extremely careful with what we see and experience, as well.

Remember, what you see is what you get -- inside your mind and soul.

May 18, 2002

Give Tzedakah! Help create inspiring
articles, videos and blogs featuring timeless Jewish wisdom.

Visitor Comments: 9

(6) Mary, May 18, 2013 7:59 PM

This is an excellent article, and food for thought. By disrespecting Torah we are disrepecting God. If something should not be viewed by children,should one really be watching it?

(5) Marlene Wiltshire, May 18, 2010 12:20 AM

Thanks. You're so right!

I totally agree. Parents need to shield their children from the profainity, violence and all questionable material present in our world today. They need to guard their eyes and their heart. I also agree that what is not appropriate for our children is also inappropriate for us, parents, and by extension the home.

James Pozzi, April 18, 2011 10:25 PM


Today's world is filled with profanity and violence. It is around us everyday and anyone who denies this is naive. You cannot turn on the news without seeing another murder or go to a sporting event without hearing a rude profanity. The parents who shield their children from these things are only are raising their children in an ideal non-exsistent world. If you want your son or daughter to be truely just and good, you need show them the beauty and the ugliness of the world so they can understand and be able overcome wrongs of the world. When children are shielded from these things they will have a hard time understanding the world because the parents only taught them the world they wanted to teach their children and in doing so failed them in preparing them for reality.

Malkiel, May 17, 2013 10:13 PM

Disagree with Disagree

I wonder if we are getting caught up in what it means to "shield" or "protect" our children? Surely, there are all too many examples of parents who, themselves, have not been able to handle the problems and vicissitudes of life and (unsurprisingly) leave their children poorly equipped to handle an even wider array of circumstances. We should not confuse this with "shielding" or "protecting" our children. Similarly, whilst "permissive" parents may desire that their children be well-prepared for life by "experiencing it all", these same parents can neither prepare their children for everything nor protect them from every harm. This, also, is not "shielding" or "protecting" our children. The problem with the "permissive" parents is secondarily that they are allowing their children to take in anything and everything but primarily that they are not actively involved in their childrens' lives. They are not " up their children in the way they are to go...". They are not providing their children a moral -- or even logical -- framework for how to understand and interact with the world. This is simply antithetical to "shielding" and "protecting" our children. Thus, to shield and protect our children is to raise them actively, being involved in their lives, and guiding their development without expecting that we are creating our own clones. And it is one of our highest callings as parents.

Esther, May 17, 2013 4:20 PM

I agree the gates should be guarded

A child's gates should be guarded. What should be done to rectify the problem with children that have already been overexposed? Such as adopted children.

See All Comments

Submit Your Comment:

  • Display my name?

  • Your email address is kept private. Our editor needs it in case we have a question about your comment.

  • * required field 2000
Submit Comment