click here to jump to start of article
Join Our Newsletter

Get latest articles and videos with Jewish inspiration and insights​




Bereishit(Genesis 1:1-6:8)

The Philosophy of the Snake

The central part of this parsha involves the story of Adam and Chavah's brief stay in Gan Eden. God gave them permission to eat all the fruits in the garden, except for the fruit of the eitz hada'as tov va'ra (tree of knowledge of good and evil). The snake came to Chavah and persuaded her to eat of the forbidden fruit. The Torah provides us with the exact conversation:

The woman said to the snake, "We may eat from the fruit of the trees in the garden. But God has told us that we may not eat nor touch the fruit of the tree in the middle of the garden, lest we die." The snake said to the woman, "You will surely not die." (Bereishis 3:2–4)

You will surely not die — he shoved her until she touched the tree, then said to her, "Just as you didn't die from touching it, so too, you won't die by eating from it." (Rashi loc. cit.)

The snake's logic appears flawed. Chavah was pushed against the tree by the snake, and no adverse consequence resulted. The snake claimed that this proved that eating the fruit of her own volition would also not have a bad outcome. But the touching was unavoidable; the eating would be deliberate. How can they be compared? The following principle should surely apply:

The Torah exempts from punishment those who act under duress. (Nedarim 27a)

There is another problem. God had promised Adam and Chavah that if they ate from the fruit, on the day that you eat from it, you will surely die. (Bereishis 2:17)

How could the snake know (or claim to Chavah) that death would not ensue from eating the fruit? Perhaps only that day Chavah would die from touching the tree. After all, the "day" mentioned by the verse was not yet over. Let us try to resolve this by considering an important quote from the Rambam.

Understanding the Consequence of Mitzvos

The majority of mitzvos are advice from afar...to fix one's ideas and to straighten all actions. (Rambam, Yad, Hilchos Temurah 4:13)

Put into ordinary terms, this means that the actual mitzvah may be several stages away from its consequence. For example, forbidden fat is not actually poisonous, and so a Jew who eats it will not suddenly be struck down with fatal symptoms. Instead, consuming the fat has some slight effect, which in turn affects something else, and so on, until the punishment mandated by the Torah manifests itself. All the mitzvos work like this. Overall, the consequence of mitzvah observance is to push our actions and general spiritual disposition toward the Torah ideal, and, conversely, the consequence of failure and sin is that we are pushed away from that ideal. One must believe that the consequence of a particular action described by the Torah will eventually manifest itself, whether for good or otherwise. But it is clear that no instant results should be expected.

The Twisted View of the Snake

This view of the mitzvah system and the way it functions was rejected by the snake. Indeed, the Rashiwe quoted above contains enough information for us to deduce the snake's entire, twisted Weltanschauung. The snake's claim, as expressed by his words, was that causes have immediate effects. He saw the world in an apparently more simplistic way than we have described: if the tree and its fruit are prohibited under pain of death, then as soon as one touches it or eats from it one should die. If one doesn't die, reasoned the snake, then the punishment is not going to happen at all.

This Weltanschauung has a converse, a viewpoint espoused not only by the snake, but by wicked people throughout the ages: a mitzvah, if valid, should produce an immediate result. If it doesn't, this reasoning continues, then it's not worth performing mitzvos at all; they just don't achieve anything. Of course, this totally omits the more subtle rationale offered by the Rambam.

Blurring the Distinction

If one looks at the claim of the snake a little more deeply, an interesting and unexpected consequence emerges. Consider the case of two people who fell into a fire. One jumped in deliberately, and the other slipped and fell in by accident. Each is equally badly burned, regardless of how he came to be in the fire in the first place.

Likewise, if two people take poison, one deliberately and one accidentally, they will both die, irrespective of the circumstances. The snake saw mitzvah observance in this light. An action produces an immediate effect. This means that he blurred the distinction between those acts perpetrated deliberately and those committed accidentally. After all, the action produces a result. If death was promised for eating the fruit of the forbidden tree, then of what relevance is it whether the act was deliberate or not? It's like taking poison by accident — you still die! At the very least, symptoms which will result in death should manifest themselves as soon as the act is committed.

The Snake's Logic

It should now be clear why, according to the snake's viewpoint, his logic was sound. We recall that he said to Chavah,

You will surely not die — he shoved her until she touched the tree, then said to her, "Just as you didn't die from touching it, so too, you won't die by eating from it." (Rashi, Bereishis 3:4)

Effectively the snake said to Chavah, "When I shoved you against the tree, you saw that nothing happened to you. You are just as healthy as before. If the punishment that God had promised is valid, then you would have died, or at least fallen ill straight away. As you didn't, there's nothing to be afraid of — you can even eat the fruit with no concern."

So by expecting immediate results from actions and blurring the distinction between deliberate and accidental acts, the snake persuaded Chavah to eat the fruit. It is important to realize that the snake expressed a totally warped view of reality to make an apparently logical case to Chavah.

Seeing the Goodness in the Fruit

This analysis can help us resolve another difficulty in the story. The narrative continues:

The woman saw that the tree was good to eat, desirable to the eyes, and that the tree was pleasant to the intellect, and she took from its fruit and ate. She also gave some to her husband with her and he ate. (Bereishis 3:6)

The difficulty here is obvious. How can one describe a taste with the sense of sight? The quality of taste is determined by the tongue, not the eyes. But now that we understand the snake's Weltanschauung, we can deal with this problem. We can assume that since Chavah went ahead and ate the fruit she accepted the claim of the snake and therefore the philosophy which lay behind it. She reckoned that as she had not been affected by touching the tree, then eating from it would also do her no harm.

It is with her sense of sight that she detected that the fruit was harmless, as it is this sense which loses its full capacity when illness and death approach. Since she could still see the tree, her sense of sight operating at full capacity, she deduced that its fruit was in fact "good to eat," that is, completely free from danger.

The Curse of the Snake

After the episode of the fruit, God cursed the snake in the following way:

May you be cursed over all the animals and all the beasts of the field. You shall crawl on your belly and eat dust all the days of your life. (Ibid., 14)

In his Aramaic translation and elaboration on this verse, Rabbi Yonasan ben Uziel remarks:

...and deadly poison shall be in your mouth. (Targum Yonasan ben Uziel loc. cit.)

This is poetic justice. The snake claimed, as we have seen, that when God promises a punishment for a certain act, it means that performing that act is like taking lethal poison — it will kill immediately. Therefore, it is most fitting that the snake's punishment forevermore is to have the taste of deadly poison permanently in his mouth. He must realize the wicked consequences of his twisted life philosophy by tasting the real effects of poison for eternity.

Excerpted from Shem MiShmuel by the Sochatchover Rebbe, rendered into English by Rabbi Zvi Belovski. Click here to order.

 

Published: September 29, 2009

Give Tzedakah! Help Aish.com create inspiring
articles, videos and blogs featuring timeless Jewish wisdom.

Visitor Comments: 10

(8) John C Shore, October 11, 2012 5:49 PM

The philosophy of the snake

First. when we receive knowledge it is not tasted by the tongue. Second to speculate of what the snake thought or did not think is confusing to people. I do not see any indication that the snake pushed Chavah. We do no know how Chavah picked the knowledge and speculation is no answer. When people speculate about what the text says there is no answer and having two or three different Rabis give an opinion to me is not an answer. Adam and Chavah ate and they died spiritually and there is no need to speculate all the other except to fill pages of books.

(7) Yehudith Shraga, October 11, 2012 1:25 AM

Thanks a lot

Very intresting observations and insights, an article which makes rethink a lot of points of view to our decision-making process.

(6) John Wakefield, October 16, 2009 8:13 AM

Now and Future

May I put forward an alternative hypothesis and that is that, prior to the fruit being eaten, death was unknown in Eden. The linkage is, perhaps, not that eating the fruit and gaining knowledge of good and evil (also previously unknown, by definition) will cause instant death, but that, through disobedience, death, as a phenomenon, comes into existence, where it was not present or known before.

(5) Anonymous, October 16, 2009 3:43 AM

Hadn't the serpent used Adam's 'fence'?

According to my understanding of the Midrash, Adam was the one who placed a 'symbolicor metaphoric fence about touching the tree ; in that way he also had aresponsibilit in misleading Chava. Why is this not cited?

(4) Rena, October 16, 2009 12:36 AM

to Ariel

I have learned that one day in G-d's terms is 1,000 years in human terms. Adam lived 930 years (having given 70 of his years to King David) and I believe that Chava lived 1,000 years and not a day more. I don't remember the source for this information but I'm sure with some research it can be easily found. I hope that helped.

See All Comments

Submit Your Comment:

  • Display my name?

  • Your email address is kept private. Our editor needs it in case we have a question about your comment.


  • * required field 2000
Submit Comment
stub