What's Bothering Rashi? Parshat Noach: In His Generations
click here to jump to start of article
Join Our Newsletter

Get latest articles and videos with Jewish inspiration and insights​




Noach(Genesis 6:9-11:32)

In His Generations

Genesis 6:9

"These are the generations of Noah; Noah was a righteous man and perfect in his generations, and Noah walked with God."

 

RASHI

In his generations - RASHI: Some of our Rabbis explain it to his credit: (he was righteous even in his generation;) certainly if he was in a generation of righteous men he would have been even more righteous. And some explain it to his discredit: In HIS generation he was righteous. But if he had been in the generation of Abraham he wouldn't have been considered anything.

Much has been discussed about this comment. Let us state first that the argument is not about the degree of Noah's righteousness. There is no argument about how righteous he was. He was what he was. The question is what the word "in his generations" means. Certainly it is a redundant word - when else would he be righteous, if not when he lived? What then does this word teach us? Was he righteous EVEN in his generation or was he righteous ONLY in his generation? Putting aside the merits of each side, we would ask: Why does Rashi change his language when he presents both views? On the credit side he says: "If he lived in a generation of righteous men he would be even more righteous." On the discredit side: "If he lived in the generation of Abraham, he wouldn't have been anything," and not, "he wouldn't have been this righteous."

 

WHY THE "GENERATION OF ABRAHAM"?

Some answer that the next righteous man after Noah was Abraham. He came after Noah's generations. So the comparison was made with him. I would say that the meaning is this: Noah was righteous in a particular sense; he was "perfect with God." He wasn't a very social fellow, he had little to do with his peers. He wasn't particularly righteous with his fellowman. He didn't try to teach them to improve their ways, as Abraham did. Abraham put himself out for his contemporaries even though they were not righteous individuals. Only by comparing Noah to Abraham can we see what he was lacking in his righteousness. He was lacking the basic element of true righteousness, "Love thy neighbor as thyself." Had he been in Abraham's generation "he wouldn't have been considered anything" because Abraham's love for mankind would have overshadowed Noah's insular-type righteousness.

 

THE LESSON

True righteousness is to be true to your God and to be true to your fellow man. Our finest example is Abraham, not Noah.

 

Shabbat Shalom,
Avigdor Bonchek


Published: October 31, 2005

Give Tzedakah! Help Aish.com create inspiring
articles, videos and blogs featuring timeless Jewish wisdom.

Visitor Comments: 3

(3) lisa, October 27, 2011 3:00 AM

If G-d chose to save Noach...he must have been pretty OK!

There are those of us who are "Noachs" & those of us who are "Avrahams".....it's all good!!

(2) Anonymous, October 19, 2009 7:16 PM

In his generations.

I take exception to the statement "There is no argument about how righteous he was." This could very well be a purely comparative statement meaning that he was righteous in comparison to those of his generations however he would not have been considered righteous when held to a higher standard of comparison.

(1) Anonymous, October 12, 2007 11:25 PM

generationS

perhaps generationS does not speak of Noach but of his neshama. Whose soul has been righteous in its generationS, this particular one of Noach.

This being a potential, then would it not be that this neshama was righteous as Avraham? The wisdom acquired, that the neshama of Noach did not plead for the redemption of the people. The neshama of Avraham ascended to this level.

"If there were but two righteous men it would be my son and I." "If there be only one it is I." Alludes to the individuality of the soul, yet that two is only a concept, because One Righteous, I. Echad. The allusion back to the neshama of Noach/Avraham = "only One, it is I."

My thoughts .....

Submit Your Comment:

  • Display my name?

  • Your email address is kept private. Our editor needs it in case we have a question about your comment.


  • * required field 2000
Submit Comment
stub