click here to jump to start of article
Join Our Newsletter

Get latest articles and videos with Jewish inspiration and insights​

Toldot(Genesis 25:19-28:9)

Esau Despised the Birthright

The parsha tells of the birth and development of Isaac's sons, Jacob & Esau, and two pivotal events in their lives: (a) Esau selling the birthright to Jacob for a bowl of porridge, and (b) Jacob fooling Isaac and taking Esau's blessing and the ensuing hatred between them.

Let's look at a Rashi on the selling of the birthright.

Genesis 25:24

"And Jacob gave Esau bread and porridge of lentils and he ate, he drank, he rose up and went. And Esau despised the birthright."



And Esau despised - RASHI: The verse testifies to his (Esau's) evil, in that he despised the service of God.

What would you ask on this simple comment?

Your Question:



A Question: Rashi seems to tell us the obvious. We see how Esau traded in the birthright (which meant the service in the Temple in the future ? which originally was to be the privilege of the firstborn) for a bowl of porridge. It was clearly evidence that Esau despised the birthright. What has Rashi added to our understanding with his comment?

Your Answer:



An Answer: Precisely! It is obvious, so why must the Torah add the words that Esau despised the birthright? The phrase is superfluous since the whole story reeks with his low opinion of the value of the birthright.

This is what Rashi is referring to ? why the need for the added phrase? How does his comment deal with this?

Your Answer:



An Answer: Rashi points out that the verse stresses Esau's belittling attitude towards the significance of the birthright. Esau himself had said, "I am going to die ? so what good is the future privilege?" But actually we might have thought that Esau was forced to sell the birthright, not because he despised it but because it was "pikuach nefesh." He was in a life-threatening situation - he was dying of hunger - and had no choice.

So Rashi tells us not to be fooled by Esau's statement of despair. He really sold it because it was valueless in his eyes. This, Rashi says, is the reason the Torah adds the phrase of Esau's despising the birthright.

Can you find support for Rashi's comment, that Esau sold it, not under duress but because he really despised it?

Your Answer:



An Answer: The Torah tells us in machine-gun style, "He ate, he drank, he rose and he went" rat tat tat.

If Esau sold the birthright purely out of duress, we would expect some expression of regret from him once he had sated his appetite. This is totally lacking. "He went" without looking back.

So Rashi says this is the evidence of his true motivation ? the birthright had absolutely no value for him for he despised it.



We would add another insight here. Granted that Esau saw no religious or other value in the birthright. It was worthless in his eyes. But "despise"! Why the extreme expression of "despise"?

I would say that, psychologically, Esau needed this defense mechanism in order to completely abandon the heritage of his forefathers. He was hungry. He was even, we could say, a glutton. But this wasn't enough even for Esau's weak conscience. Remember: he was raised in Isaac's home and also Abraham was alive during his youth.

He needed even more justification to throw away such a heritage than just hunger. So, psychologically, he had to belittle the birthright even more ? even to despise it ? in order to quiet his conscience and allow him to slurp the porridge to his heart's content.

For those interested, we find a similar psychological message in Megillas Esther (3:6) where it says: "It was despicable in his (Haman's) eyes to lay a hand on Mordecai alone." We see the same phrase ? and the same psychological need on Haman's part to justify killing one Jew for his inflated ego. For more insights, see the new "What's Bothering Rashi?" on Megillat Esther.


Shabbat Shalom,
Avigdor Bonchek

November 26, 2005

Give Tzedakah! Help create inspiring
articles, videos and blogs featuring timeless Jewish wisdom.

Visitor Comments: 2

(2) eliyahu.klimek, October 28, 2013 4:57 PM

Esav's intent was to set up Ya'aqov to be killed

Sepher haYashar relates that Esav killed Nimrod the same year Avraham died. As a hunted fugitive, he came to his brother exhausted, being pursued by the avengers of blood. The twins were fifteen at the time, and Ya'aqov valued (and envied) the right of Bechor. Esav knew this envy, and sought to exploit it by bestowing it upon his younger sibling, and thus make him the target of the avenger of blood who was seeking his life. It is the first recorded attempt on the part of Esav, to seek his brother Ya'aqov's life cut short, but it resulted in transfer of the birthright over to him. This occurred when Yitzchaq was 75 (5 x 15) years old, and the cycles of redemption are seen in the numbers, as the identity of the number 15 means redemption. It also calls to mind that Abram was 75 when the Covenant of Promise was given to him, and Sarah was 90 (6 x 15) when she had given birth to Yitzchaq. Accordingly her 90 years his 75 years = 165 (11 x 15). Recall too, that is exactly 1500 years from the Exodus until 30 c.e., a time of strategic importance that was forty years prior to the destruction of the Beit Mikdash in 70 c.e. The midpoint of this time 722 b.c.e and was the year of the last deportations of the northern tribes. This took place 200 years before the 'handwriting on the wall' episode in Daniel 5, which ends with Darius the Mede taking the kingdom that night. Two other places this is mentioned is in Daniel 9:1 and 11:1 and what is significant about this is that the gematria of Mene Mene Teqel Upharsin is 2520, think gerah as in ger, an exile, and precisely 2,520 (7 x 360) years from Daniel 5, comes 9/11/2001 in NYC, when the Twin Towers fell. Don't deny the obvious.

(1) Yonah Yaffe, November 15, 2012 9:37 AM

Thank you.

Thank you

Submit Your Comment:

  • Display my name?

  • Your email address is kept private. Our editor needs it in case we have a question about your comment.

  • * required field 2000
Submit Comment