In June 2016 Canada legalized euthanasia and assisted suicide, referred to as "Medical Assistance in Dying" (MAiD). In under 4 years,13,000 people have died by euthanasia. This represents about 2% of all deaths in Canada, a number that will rise substantially under a new bill, Bill C-7, that is currently being proposed. Canada's rate has increased more rapidly than other permissive jurisdictions and is approaching current rates in the Netherlands and Belgium, where euthanasia has been legal for almost 20 years.
Bill C-7 will alter the practice of medicine, as it expands MAiD to virtually everyone who is seriously sick and suffering. Canada will become the world leader in administering death if the bill is passed in its current form.
Some of the key changes proposed by Bill C-7 are:
-
Death does not have to be "reasonably foreseeable" (those who are not dying can end their lives)
-
A 90-day waiting period when death is not "reasonably foreseeable" is proposed, while just to see a psychiatrist can easily take more than 90 days
-
When death is reasonably foreseeable, a 10-day waiting period between a request for assisted suicide and its execution, to allow for a "change of heart", is eliminated (In 2019 there were 263 such requests within this 10-day time period. Under C-7 a person can be diagnosed, assessed and euthanized all in one day).
-
Doctors will face sanctions if they refuse to refer a patient seeking MAiD to another doctor who will end the patient's life. This has a serious impact on doctor's freedom of conscience.
I sent the following letter to the Canadian government.
Dear Senators,
I am writing to you after reviewing the update on the revisions to the MAiD laws.
As a practicing Jew, I disagreed with the philosophy behind these laws from their inception. Judaism believes in the sanctity of human life. As the Talmud says, “If you save one life it is as if you have saved the entire world.” Every moment of life on earth is of intrinsic, infinite value, and beyond our understanding in its future implications for the soul in the next world.
I witnessed firsthand how my mother’s care in the hospital was affected by MAid. I am even more horrified by our country leading the world in euthanasia practices by allowing patients and others easy access to choose death at a time when they are at their weakest and most vulnerable.
My mother was in the hospital June 2016 when Bill C-7 was first passed and Medical Assistance in Dying was being offered. Both her doctors and palliative care team had decided she was unable to be treated and they would therefore make her ‘as comfortable as possible’. This meant that every morning the palliative care doctors would be by her bedside as early as 8 AM offering to increase her pain medication. As laypeople we figured they knew what they were doing and that they were simply guiding my mother along the inevitable course of her illness. We later found out that increasing one’s pain medication is often a way of shortening a person’s life.
When the doctors recommended that we deny our mother ‘liquids’ even though she was capable of eating and drinking, we knew something was terribly wrong.
When the doctors called a meeting to recommend that we deny our mother ‘liquids’ even though she was still capable of eating and drinking, we knew something was terribly wrong.
Meanwhile a practicing Jewish oncologist and family friend kept insisting that my mother was treatable. In the nick of time, we rushed her out of the first hospital which had condemned her to death and put her in the care of this new doctor who does not believe in MAiD. It is important to note that under this new law, a doctor who refuses to refer his patient who has requested euthanasia can lose his medical license.
In this doctor’s care, my mother lived another 15 months, celebrated two weddings of grandchildren and experienced the joy of three great grandchildren being born. She lived long past the day that an arrogant medical student at the first hospital announced would be her last.
If not for this new oncologist, who takes the Hippocratic oath seriously and practices with the desire to save lives and not end them, my mother would have died before her time.
It was absolutely unbelievable, dear Senators, to witness how psychiatrists and palliative care doctors alike were helping my mother to die, all the while believing themselves to be the compassionate ones. Either they were raising the dosage of her pain medication so that she would be too drugged to get out of bed or even have the energy to eat, or convincing her psychologically that her life was no longer meaningful and that at 85, it was no longer worth living without the ability to play tennis or paint.
“I think you are trying to kill me!” Stupid, my mother wasn’t.
When my mother got out of bed for the first time, as we began to insist they lower the dosage of her pain meds, she turned to the palliative team early one morning and said to them, “I think you are trying to kill me!” Stupid, my mother wasn’t.
If not for having been blessed with a family who were able to be by her side around the clock, doctors and lawyers among them, and all of us third generation English-speaking Canadians, I shudder to think what her chances would’ve been. How much more intimidated must those less acquainted with the English language and new immigrants to Canada be, facing these doctors at such an emotionally charged time.
As my sister-in-law, a doctor, explained to me drily on a drive home together from the hospital one night. “It’s very simple, they need the bed. Its’ all about scarce resources.”
This law is dangerous. It is a slippery slope and the ramifications of where it begins and ends are horrendous.
Getting rid of the weak and unproductive members of society is an act of cruelty, not compassion. As Jews, we know very well where this kind of thinking leads to.
Only a society with a total disregard for the sanctity of human life could practice medicine in this way and call this progress.
How dare doctors play God and encourage death rather than life!
I beg of you to reconsider passing this law and thereby make the option to choose death easily available to anyone, young or old, healthy or sick, who is having a bad day, week, month or year.
You, our esteemed Senators, have been put in positions of leadership to choose life over death and encourage Canadians to overcome challenges rather than giving in to them.
Thank you for reading this letter and reconsidering the ramification of Bill C-7 and MAiD.
It’s never too late to take the proper and sane course to end this MAiD madness.
Sincerely,
Devorah Vale
For more information, visit https://www.facebook.com/MAID2MAD.AMMdevientMAM
Here's what you can do:
- Contact as many Senators as you can and let them know you oppose this legislation on moral and religious grounds.
- Write letters to the editor of newspapers.
- Use social media to let people know the dangers inherent in this proposed law.
(12) Samuel Hollander, January 26, 2021 7:00 PM
I live in Israel, where euthanasia is forbidden.My mother was 91 years old, she had been suffering of myeloma. By 2017 her state worsened. Yet her mind remained completely clear. It looked as she had 2, maximum 3 months to live... She lived in a house for retired. She needed a round-the-clock care. The administration of the house was impatient: there is always a huge queue of people waiting for lodging. Keeping a round-the-clock carer is forbidden there.
Her doctor warned that moving to any other place, especially to a nursing home, might cause the most grave consequences. I attached his report, when I applied for a temporary permit for a nurse to live with her. The ministry official refused. He stated that "the doctor is incompetent". And that 'we have perfectly organized institutions for such people, with well trained staff'. And my mother left her home. 'I only hope they will do away with me very soon' she said.Visiting hours in the nursing home where very limited. A mobile phone was put out of her reach. My next visit was only 4 days later. The stench in the room for 3 was horrible. While it was ventilated my Mum was in a wheelchair in a hall. The air-conditioner used for heating burnt oxygen. Bad environment, even for healthy people, and my mother already had serious lung problem. I found her condition worsened dramatically and her memory confused.In the end, one of the "well trained staff" came up and, with his rude and inept actions, broke her arm (her bones were extremely fragile, which was the cause of her disease). There was no point to discuss the surgery. Doctors in the hospital had offered morphine. Euthanasia? - I asked. '-Not actually. She suffers of severe pain, we have to ease her suffering". Could I say 'No'?! For another 2 days, my mother lied under injections of morphine, which soothed her pain and suppressed her breathing..The whole 'recycling process', since she left her home, took 7 days..And is this how a human should leave the world?!!
(11) Anonymous, January 22, 2021 10:56 AM
Hippocrates
Your thoughts are very justified and written beautifully.
(10) Mike.J.Greenwald, January 21, 2021 10:20 PM
Eye opener
Thank you for this writ. It was an eye opener for me. I would not expect this liberal King, Trudeau of being of such callous soul!
Obviously, we need to take some serious actions, by at least writing to the senators, thus advising them on the sanctity of life.
(9) Maria Eugenia Olavarria de Ersson, January 20, 2021 7:01 PM
Standing up for others to end horrific medical practices
Dear Devorah,
I admire you for your courage in writing to Canadian Senators to end the lunacy of offering and enlarging euthanasia. Your concern is most valid particularly in light of what you and your siblings went through. I live in Sweden where euthanasia is not allowed by law, but where it is practiced as a matter of course to many cancer patients and today to many Covid-19 patients.
I wish you success in your plea and admire you for having stood up for your mother and for standing up now for potential victims of a horrific practice.
Sincerely,
Maria Eugenia
(8) Rivkah Ozersky, January 20, 2021 6:49 PM
I am so outraged that I have to see all these infamous laws as a travesty and perversion of basic moral values which are a result of the imminent arrival of Mashiach. When darkness is the darkest just before Dawn.
(7) Anonymous, January 19, 2021 8:25 PM
Very good article well written , author should write a book
Makes murder very easy for how do you proof that suicide was not requested? Particularly in cases like dementia and where the individual has no next of kin? Also, given such regulations one should be able to request hydrocholorquine in case of COVID if one consents to its alleged lethal side effects. But strangely enough here the honorable "profession" gets very uptight for the sake of "life" regarding a drug that seems to have more side effects incase COVID than Malaria which makes one wonder.....
anon, January 20, 2021 3:17 AM
Very good point about HCQ
(6) Andrea Schonberger, January 19, 2021 8:17 PM
It must be a personal decision
I reside in Washington state and in 2008 the voters passed the Death with Dignity Act (Initiative 1000, codified as Chapter 70.245 RCW). I did vote to pass this initiative as I strongly feel that people who have less than 6 months to live, are of sound mind, and have exhausted all treatment possibilities should have the option to peacefully end their life. I do not take this option lightly. I'm a cancer survivor and my mother-in-law is in stage 4 breast cancer and recently underwent a mastectomy. We should have end of life choices whether it be hospice care, traditional medical care, or request a prescription from our doctor to end our life peacefully. When I die, I want a good death and want my family to have good last memories of me and not as a bed-ridden, poor soul who's as helpless as a new born baby.
(5) Daniel, January 19, 2021 3:44 PM
Wonderful
What a beautiful and enlightening article. Made it Be successful in abolishing despicable murder.
(4) Anonymous, January 19, 2021 3:01 PM
How dare you?
Just because Jews, Muslims, Jehovah's Witnesses etc do not believe that we can end our own lives, WE HAVE NO RIGHT to try to force our beliefs upon everybody else.
I totally and fundamentally disagree with this author. Everybody should have the right to decide if they want to end their own life early in the case of impending death.
For the record, I, also, am a Jew. I would never take this option because it is against my beliefs, however I wholeheartedly believe in the right for people to have this option if they so choose.
Please remember that just because euthanasia is illegal, it doesn't mean that it won't happen - it just means that a person will have to die alone in a cabin in the woods rather than in the comfort of his or her own home surrounded by the family they love.
Daniel, January 19, 2021 3:57 PM
Reply
Dear ‘How dare you?’
When it comes to politics, social conventions, mannerisms, language etc. everyone’s opinions matter and should be counted. However when God told the Jewish people not to commit murder, which includes euthanasia according to the laws of the Torah, this is a law that does not just apply to the Jewish people, it applies to all of humanity. I assume you have forgotten that all non-Jews are obligated by the creator of the world, God, in seven Commandments, one of them being Do Not Murder. If other religions do not recognize these laws of God or they are atheists completely denying God, such beliefs deserve zero respect and consideration from others since we are commanded by God to uphold his laws regardless of other peoples views. No, people do not have the freedom of choice to choose to murder.
anon, January 19, 2021 4:44 PM
How dare THEY?!
Interesting. I would say the exact opposite, that is: how DARE a person take his own life?
He is not the "master" of his life. He did not create it, and he does not have the right to end it. For him to end his life is to TRESPASS, to presume rights that are not his. How DARE he trespass into G-d's domain?!
Furthermore, how DARE he endanger other people's lives in this manner? Someone else's choice to end his life has a definite effect on the perceived value of MY life. That makes it personal. How dare HE degrade, and possibly shorten, MY life in this manner? How DARE he?
Dvirah, January 19, 2021 5:23 PM
Whose Choosing?
If it were just a matter of giving a choice, your argument might be allowable. However, this article makes clear that euthanasia is already the preferred practice for most doctors - even against the patients' and their families' wishes. How long will it take for there to be NO choice - and even minor illnesses requiring hospitalization will be a death sentence?
Anonymous, January 19, 2021 9:22 PM
Sorry, but for that one you neither need doctors nor medical insurance
all you need is a rope which no doctor can top..Luckily the Almighty has set up boundaries beyond which man cannot go and assisted suicide is one of them. If they proceed with this idea doctors and hospitals will run out of business. For those that seek life won't trust them anymore and those that truly seek death can have it better and cheaper by doing it themselves. He who has a pet knows that it isn't that simple as the medical profession makes it appear. I once learned from a horse owner that it took an eternity till a vet finally succeeded in putting it "to sleep" Any efficient slaughterer would have been better and cheaper. With this bill going through, subsequent rumours abounding and patients running away our medical profession may well end up like J. Roumanille's "Le Médecin de Cucugnan" a short story that tells of doctor who desperate for patients, advertised to the village community his services to re-awaken the dead of Cucugnan..... (his project failed as the assembly he gathered at the cemetery could not agree on a single one to be re - awakened
Anonymous, January 20, 2021 2:41 AM
Protection From Undue Pressure
Opposition to this law is not about forcing our beliefs on anyone. It's has to do with giving people the right to exercise their personal beliefs without interference from others. As the situation now stands,, medical professionals routinely coerce seriously ill people to end their lives. Similar pressure is put on the families of such patients.
The law needs to be amended so that interest in euthanasia is raised by the patient and not the doctor. There must also be more independent oversight.
It is only with adequate safeguards in place that vulnerable patients and their loved ones are protected from being preyed upon by the many medical professionals who subscribe to the culture of death that now permeates hospitals and long term care homes.
(3) bet, January 19, 2021 2:46 PM
THANK YOU FOR GIVING VOICE TO THE LIVING THE DYING AND THE DEAD
THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR THE INTEGRITY TO POST ABOUT THIS MOST DIFFICULT BUT IMPORTANT TOPIC. THANK YOU MORE FOR YOUR CANDOR IN CALLING ALL OF US TO THE CARPET. IT IS NOT JUST THE RESPONSIBILIY OF DOCTORS WHO WE ENTRUST CARE TO. NOT JUST OUR ELECTORS WHO WE SELECT TO REPESENT US. BUT THE REPONSIBILITY OF US ALL TO GIVE REASON AND VOICE CONSCENCE AND HOPE TO THOSE WHOS VOICES AND LIVES WOULD BE SILENCED.
(2) John, January 18, 2021 8:54 PM
How we long for Messiah!
(1) Jeff Pearce, January 18, 2021 12:17 AM
Bill C-7 is against God's Law and decent Mora;l;lity.
I am an Australian Christian with Jewish Blood in my Ancestry. For some time I have been researching the way Hitler treated over 20 million Poles, Checz, Hungarians, Germans and others. At least 6 million of them were Jewish, God's chosen people. It makes me feel angry to see this euthanasia being propagated as "help" for the patient. It is quite possibly the forerunner to more evil practices as put in to action by Hitler anf his henchmen. It must be stopped!