It’s the season. I’ve just finished marking papers and submitting grades. I gave them all A’s for the semester. You’re thinking, “Easy grader.” I’m thinking: “I actually care about learning.” My students all worked hard, showed seriousness of purpose and mastery of what they read. I want them to feel good about what they learned, take it with them and feel confident about themselves as future teachers. When you give grades, you hold immense power over people. Every grade you give is a label you force students to wear that tells them what you think of them, regardless of what you actually think of them.
And here’s a big secret that’s no secret at all: Nothing gets in the way of learning more than grades.
I didn’t say it first. Read Alfie Kohn’s “Feel-Bad Education” or his challenge — to go from degrading to de-grading in schools. You can be a member of the No-Grades Movement or join the thousands in the Teachers Throwing Out Grades Facebook group who believe that observation, feedback, iteration and student self-evaluation will make real learners out of students. Grades won’t. You might read about the 40-plus schools in New York City that have moved to mastery-based learning. Better yet, you might sign your kid up.
But don’t wait too long. Kids who don’t get good grades can find their report cards a confirmation of failure to those whose opinions matter most to them: parents and teachers. Bad grades can cripple a child’s sense of self-worth — no matter who they are outside of the classroom. Good grades can have an equally deleterious impact. The drama. The self-hate. The recriminations. The judgment. The humiliation. The outsized, Olympic expectations that drive children to over-perform make robots, not learners. As the adage goes, “The notes of the teacher become the notes of the student without passing through the brains of either.” This was the perfect description of everything I crammed in my brain for finals that stayed there precisely until the test was over.
The stress levels experienced by “good” students today are simply not worth the price of the paper of that impressive diploma. And because good is a moral judgment above all, let’s talk about how much goodness we squeeze out of grades when they are the No. 1 reason students cheat, take short-cuts or act brutally competitive. What grades produce more than anything else is anxiety, and we cannot afford any more anxiety in schools today than we already have.
Eliminating grades moves motivation from the extrinsic to the intrinsic.
In “The Case for Not Giving Grades,” Marty Nemko asserts that “Eliminating grades moves motivation from the extrinsic to the intrinsic,” and reminds us that issuing grades is a way for professors and teachers to get away with poor instruction. Sometimes kids work hardest in classes that are the most poorly taught. They don’t want to ruin their GPA because a teacher is lazy or incompetent. Teachers who give up on grades have found alternative, meaningful ways to bring students into assessments and together create personalized learning plans. It takes time. It takes intention. It takes good teaching to make good learners. And when it’s done well, it’s called education.
Yes, I am passionate about this subject, nowhere more than in Jewish studies in Jewish day schools. You’ll argue that if we don’t give kids grades, they won’t take their classes seriously. I argue that most kids aren’t taking bad teaching seriously anyway. They’re just throwing away a love of subject to something more worthy, where they feel good about themselves. A Talmud teacher confessed to me that he had an excellent student but gave him a B-plus because he often came late to class. Not surprisingly, that student disengaged from Talmud study altogether. He saw his teacher as a person with the wrong priorities. Think about it. Most of us can’t remember what we learned years ago. We remember feelings about certain teachers that got transmitted to the subjects they taught. Associations linger.
Some schools, dare I say it, give grades in prayer. Imagine the judgment. Tender spirituality is squashed. Sure, it’s hard to get kids quiet, but consider the long-term soul-damage. It’s simply irreparable. Do you think God gives us grades? You cannot have a warm, loving, intimate relationship with a God who gives grades. Even if you’re an A student.
There will come a day when a few courageous Jewish day schools have the vision to take a bold step out of an outmoded system and do what Jews have done for millennia: study for its own sake. You brave few will make life-long learners out of your students. You will foster curiosity and love. You will nurture engagement and intellect. You will grow the soul. You will show the rest of us the way.
(7) Anonymous, June 5, 2018 12:16 AM
You are spot on!
Having taught for over 20 yrs, I can only offer a resounding thank you to the author of this article, who has hit the proverbial nail squarely on the head!
Thank you for having the courage to express an opinion that is 'out of the box' and yet so beneficial to those who are genuinely interested in learning and not merely in acquiring a piece of paper to prove it!
In truth- there is a place for grading - but ONLY when done in the context of real learning - not mere memorization.
Much of what is defined as learning within our current school system isn't retained in the student's long term memory.When asked info a mere few weeks after completion of their finals, many will likely respond with a blank look. The entire focus of their study is to get that grade onto their test- then it 's time to burn the textbooks!
We've created a very superficial generation of learners, who mostly regard their studies as a means to an end.
A toddler begins life with an endearing fascination with the world, but by the time he has completed his education, we've beaten that incredible joy out of him, teaching him how to fail!
No one claims that they should be taught to cop out- on the contrary- there's so much to learn out there and most kids are actually interested in learning it- particularly if blessed with creative teachers who understand that one size doesn't fit all.
Our current methods of assessment have created higher stress levels in kids than ever recorded. Stress does not equal beating laziness out of children- because believe it or not most kids actually love learning- until they are taught to hate it!
Let's get our act together- take a look at the revolutionary educational ideas initiated in Sweden - where formal learning has been tweaked - the scores-AND student satisfaction are higher than anywhere else..
Better yet- how about taking advice from the Torah itself that exhorts us to teach each child- 'al pi darko'
(6) Canucj, June 4, 2018 11:57 PM
I'm with you 100%, Dr. Erica.
So what's my background? Well, I've spent over 50 years in public education (including post-retirement subbing),. I have served as a HS teacher, dept. head, & president of a teachers' union. All this varied experience has totally convinced me that grading is COPUNTERPRODUCTIVE to learning. There are many reasons for this opinion, but here are just a few: (a) Frequently, more than half a teacher's time & energy goes into student evaluation -- & this is time & energy stolen from the real job of teaching; (b) In today's narcissistic culture, so many parents are outraged if their kids don't get high marks that the teachers often pad the marks just to preserve their sanity (& even their jobs), -- therefore, why bother to grade at all if the marks are fake? (c) Much evaluation is subjective & thus subject to bias (e.g., female teachers might automatically give higher marks to girls than to boys); (d) Even so-called "objective" tests, e.g., multiple choice, have on occasion been shown to be faulty, because the tests were later tampered with by school personnel. Well, 4 reasons are all I have time to provide, but I'd sure like to see what some other commenters can come up with.
(5) JB Destiny, June 4, 2018 8:20 AM
What’s lazier than giving every student an A?
Does the author of this piece honestly believe that her students think they’re all A students, because they each got an A from a teacher who only gives As? Even by her own criteria, is it likely that her students - every one of them - applied themselves to the best of their abilities, working hard showing purpose and mastery of the material? I suppose if she teaches five or so students in a purely elective class and gives constant feedback and uses little red ink. Otherwise, stop deluding yourself, Dr. Brown. Not all students will show equal mastery of all subjects, and it’s an insult to all of them to hand them identical grades. Preschoolers understand that there’s no value in a trophy when everyone gets one, but you don’t? If you’re going to do that (and are not just trying to give your students a false sense of accomplishment), be honest and give them each a C, which indicates that the student has completed all the requirements to pass. A or B means they exceeded the requirements. Teach your class as P/F. Once, I even had a teacher who gave each student the choice of letter grade or P/F so they could choose the method that motivated them best. Please stop corrupting the system and claiming nobility for it. (Yeah, I know, *other* people *wrongly* value As, so that’s what you give out. I believe that’s called justifying the means because of the ends.)
(4) Dr. Lyone Fein, June 3, 2018 11:19 PM
Keep Grades and Add All the Other Things
I am so relieved to read the other negative reactions to this essay. Throwing out grades is clearly not the answer to fixing the many things that are wrong with American education. Retaining grades means retaining a method of objectively measuring a child's progress in relation to other children, in relation to fixed educational goals, and in relation to her own previous accomplishments.
Crucially, this is not an either/or situation. It is possible to incorporate all of the "observation, feedback, iteration and student self-evaluation" ( and so much more besides!) while still using grades. And we all can point to educators at all levels who do precisely this.
Grades represent goals for students to strive for. Without something concrete, like a grade or a score, the short and long term objectives of education can become rather murky for students and parents alike.
(3) Emil, June 3, 2018 7:43 PM
Are you restricting this advice to Limudei Kodish?
If one wants to get into a highly selective university or and then graduate school, one needs to have a history of higher grades than those one is competing with.
(2) Anonymous, June 3, 2018 3:51 PM
How do you evaluate your students
How you evaluate your students if you don't give them any grades?
How they know if their knowledge is adequate without having any grades. How do you tell a student that he have to improve his knowledge without having grades, both the student and you must know what is his achievement ' is he ready to pass to a higher level/
What is the criteria to pass to a higher class or higher level of learning ?
I would appreciate your insight to the topic.
Canuck, June 11, 2018 6:30 PM
How do you evaluate your students if you DO grade them?
If you read my comment above (by Canuck), one point I made is that much grading is FAKE. Nowadays, failing or even mediocre passing grades are often attributed to the incompetence of the teacher, rather than to a student's lack of effort or suitability for the subject/level. As a result, an increasing number of teachers just give everybody high grades in order to survive! But, you might ask, what about objective (multiple-choice) tests that are put in a sealed envelope & later marked externally? Well, these are not foolproof either. During my ed. career I heard many stories about sealed envelopes (containing tests) being placed in freezers to unglue the tabs, after which the teats would be removed...& then quickly & efficiently altered by means of templates. This is especially likely in jurisdictions where govt. funding is contingent on the results of these so-called "objective" tests. So, how confident are you in grading now?
(1) deb webster, June 3, 2018 3:32 PM
illiterate socialism doomed to failure
Open any tally re academic world achievement. The U.S., used to be #1. now, it's 25th. It used to be that quality educators strived to challenge, elevate, inspire. It used to be that being the best, doing ones best, was the goal. You, Madame, would seek to remove pride, individuality, excellence, competition, discipline, dignity, for the sake of a feel-good moment in the classroom. 11 books and GWU aside, Dearie, you dont have a clue what made this nation great; which is why it's struggling mightily at the present time. The dumbing down of American education is due to folks like you. I bet you don't want winners in sports, in business, in industry, in science in government, either. Just the ooze of kinda, oughta, shoulda; "make nice."
For Heaven's sake. Grades, testing, pressure, effort, are all ingedients that create maturity, and allow one to practice coping with adulthood and the real world. Grades, tests, are relative forms of measurement. They indicate accomplishment. This, in part, is why Jews and Jewish education are so remarkable--they have always been a cut above. You, Dr. Brown, would eradicate excellence in favor of sameness, equality, and levelling education to the lowest realm of mediocrity, so everyone could be happy.
Part of being "happy" is to do the best one can do, be the best one can be. Not in your world. Wash away determination and effort. Laud herd mentality. Tell every kid that he understands what he's doing, whether he does or not.
Mazel Tov: Idiots Delight; robotic thinking. If you would take the time to conect the dots, you would discover that time/tests/ grades,/definitions/classifications/etc., are all means of measurement--comparisons. Without comparisons and measurements, we could not survive as a civilization. That's how we determine Jews from non-Jews: We compare and contrast; we measure. So it is with grades and tests--we measure. The best and the brightest are about individual achievement.