“Nothing vast enters the life of mortals without a curse.” – Sophocles
This quote opens the docudrama, “The Social Dilemma,” a hard-nosed indictment of Big Tech and the social media platforms it has created. These platforms have transfixed us, angered us, entertained us, used us as human click bait for billions of dollars of advertising revenue, divided us socially and politically, and purposefully reduced us to social media addicts.
The titanic power of social media platforms has never been more in the news, but in addition to the big picture questions about their power to promote or to silence, we need to also understand what they try to do to us on an individual level. Now streaming on Netflix and directed by Jeff Orlowski, “The Social Dilemma” features a host of former tech insiders from Google, Facebook, Pinterest, Instagram, Twitter and more. Several were high ranking executives, and all have one thing in common: they eventually turned against the products and mindset that drives Big Tech.
Here are some of the more dramatic indictments these insiders leveled against the industry:
“Facebook discovered that they were able to detect real world behaviors and emotions without triggering the users’ awareness.”
“If you’re not paying for the product, you are the product. You are clickbait.”
“There are only two industries that call their customers users: illegal drugs and software.”
Tristan Harris is a former design ethicist at Google and co-founder of the Center for Humane Technology. He became frustrated with the lack of moral concern for what social media was doing to people. “I felt we had lost our way,” he said. “No one at Google was talking about the obvious addictive quality to email, but instead was fixated on simply the colors of the in box.” He wrote a manifesto, “a call to arms,” urging Google colleagues to face up to their responsibilities regarding the larger moral issues involved with social media participation.
“There are only two industries that call their customers users: illegal drugs and software.”
“Never before in history had only 50 designers, all of them white guys between the ages of 20-30, influenced the behavior of 50 million people,” he said. Initially, his manifesto created some buzz. It was downloaded hundreds of times at Google, and people talked about it for a day or two, telling Harris they agreed completely. Then, nothing. He left Google, citing “ethical concerns.”
“Your friend just tagged you in a photo.” Facebook sends these messages but doesn’t show you the photo. They want you back on their platform to see it, hoping you’ll stay. We see this kind of lure through the fictionalized scenes in the movie, interspersed with the interviews, of a typical family and social media’s impact on them. During these scenes, viewers see three very young guys – stand-ins for Artificial Intelligence programs – working tirelessly to manipulate the behavior of a college-age young man in the family, who has a crush on a girl who is seeing someone else. The AI guys ruthlessly track his movements online and tempt him to follow the posted activities of the girl he pines for. As frustrated as the AI team is when he ignores the notifications, they celebrate when he finally clicks on an ad they placed in his feed. They cheer that it cost them only 3.2 cents for that ad impression. Success!
Tide of Danger
Nearly every interviewee had once seen their role in Big Tech as a force for good, but once the proverbial genie was out of the bottle, it was impossible to stem the tide of danger: the growing and unchecked power of Big Tech to control what you see and hear; its addictive nature and the resulting alienation and anxiety in many people; and the relentless monetization of each person through tracking their actions and manipulating what they see to generate desired responses, such as clicking on ads. All of social media’s three main goals: engagement, growth (come back and invite friends) and advertising, are each powered by algorithms. (I strongly resent the bombardment of ads I see for anti-aging cosmetic treatments.)
The film is a bit heavy handed, allowing almost no comment about social media being a tool for good. People can make valuable connections online, can enjoy enriching, educational and entertaining content, create awareness for causes, advertise small businesses, and teach all kinds of skills. Even organ donors may be found online. But this film was made to underscore the extent to which average individuals are in the dark about how Big Tech really operates, and about how even the owners and rulers of the kingdom have no idea how to tame the beast.
Impact on Gen Z
The children born after 1996, often called Gen Z, are the first kids in history who went through middle school on social media. This generation is more anxious, fragile, depressed, and insecure than previous generations. As older teens, they are less likely to get a driver’s license or to begin to date.
A girl around 10 or 11 years old, the youngest in the fictionalized family, is shown as completely unable to be away from her phone even during a family dinner. Breaking a glass bowl to grab her phone and escaping with her phone to her room, she immediately checks how many people admire her digitally “beautified” image on TikTok. Her smile turns to tears when another girl makes a mean comment about her. Her expression becomes haunted.
Jonathan Haidt, PhD, social psychologist at the New York University’s Stern School of Business and author of “The Righteous Mind: Why Good people are Divided by Politics and Religion,” was also interviewed. He noted the shocking rise in depression and anxiety among American teenagers, which began around 2011-2013. Until 2009, he said, the number of girls admitted to hospitals every year for cutting or other self-harming activities had been stable, then shot up by 62 percent among girls ages 15-19 and by 189 percent in girls 10-14. “Snapchat dysmorphia” is the name used to describe this particular kind of warped self-image, in which young girls demand plastic surgery to look more like the pictures they see online in filtered selfies.
On the topic of children and social media, Harris noted, “We used to protect children. Certain products were not allowed on Saturday morning kids’ TV shows. But YouTube for Kids has no regulations, no protections.”
Many tech industry leaders were trained at the Stanford Persuasive Technology Lab, where they learn to become “behavior change geniuses,” according to one Lab instructor. Persuasive Tech has given rise to the field called “growth hacking” – infiltrating people’s psychology with the goal of manipulating behavior.
“We become the product. We are the commodity. We are the clickbait"
Tristan Harris states that Big Tech and social media are run on a “disinformation business model,” where everyone ends up with their own facts. Did you know that Google provides different definitions of things depending on what your interests are, and where you are Googling from? Because we end up seeing information that only reinforces our own views, we become hostile toward, or even develop hatred for, those who believe differently.
Placing Limits
Many of these former insiders fell prey to the systems they created. Tim Kendall, a former Facebook executive and former president of Pinterest, admitted that he would come home and type emails in his pantry while his kids waited for his love and attention. “I told myself 1,000 times I wouldn’t bring my phone to the bedroom, then 9 p.m. rolled around and I thought, so I’ll bring it to the bedroom.” Now, he and his wife do not allow their kids to be on social media until they’re in high school.
Here is how many of them deal with and limit social media in their lives:
Several have uninstalled all social media apps from their phones and disabled all notifications unrelated to anything critical to their lives. A European tech expert no longer uses Google but the search engine Quant, which doesn’t store data. One is careful to never choose a video recommended by YouTube. “You should always make the choice,” he said. One woman had to write her own software to cure herself of a Reddit addiction.
They also advise:
- Fact check before you share. If it’s designed to stir your emotions, it probably is.
- Get information from different sources. Follow people of different points of view.
- Zealously protect young children from screen time.
- No devices in the bedroom past a fixed time every night.
- Work out a time budget with kids for screen time. Talk to them about it; they will often make reasonable suggestions.
Jaron Lanier, author of “Ten Arguments for Deleting Your Social Media Accounts Right Now” and considered the “founding father” of Virtual Reality, was among the most vehement about the destructive force of social media. He said, “It’s the gradual, imperceptible change in your own behavior and perception that is the product. There’s nothing else on the table. If even a few people delete all their social media accounts, it makes space for conversation. Get off the stupid stuff. The world’s beautiful.”
The film did not totally lose its sense of humor. At the end of the credits, the screen said, “Follow us on social media! Just kidding.”
(9) Eleanor Skibo, January 31, 2021 7:06 AM
Social Media
It’s true, social media comes with many prices. When you first sign up, you think that the world is your oyster, unfortunately, it comes without a pearl. You’ve just sold your identity, your time, and your common sense. And you can’t buy it back; it haunts you in every dark back alley then gives you insomnia. People don’t make a fortune off of the stock exchange without your participation. Do you want to sell your soul to an idol or G d!
Orrin, February 6, 2021 11:51 AM
Well put
Great writing!
(8) Anonymous, January 24, 2021 7:34 PM
Amazing & eye-opening article! Thank you!
I'm so grateful that we got rid of our TV in the 70s, when our kids were really young. I deliberately avoid social media; I find even listening to news on the radio is no longer an unbiased experience. Seem everyone has an agenda. The huge political divide in the USA is scary. Social media has contributed to this.
Can anyone give me sources for the connection of social media to cutting in teenagers?
(7) LarryB, January 21, 2021 9:05 PM
Your in control
My kids first phone they bought themselves. They were 17 or 18. I didn’t buy one until I was 61. I used a company phone but never for personal calls. My kids were not allowed to get on the computer in privacy only at the dinner table until junior or senior in high school. They also never asked to either. It was very natural and not heavy handed. A phone and a computer are tools but will become much more if you aren’t careful. Even games like Nintendo were played in front of the family in the living room only. If that sounds harsh they didn’t nor their friends because 5 and 6 were at our house daily. I have fond memories of all the children and their laughter. I joined Facebook for a couple of months at the almost begging request of a former colleague. Just like I had thought it turned out to be glorified email. One of the dumbest programs I have ever seen.
(6) Dhianna, January 21, 2021 3:48 PM
It was time to go
As the election rolled around, I found myself on social media constantly and watching t.v. which is strange for someone who grew up without one. I even listened to shirum with a headphone in one ear, and the other ear had a headphone tuned to talk radio. I realized I was not learning or growing as a Jew. I shut off the t.v. (o.k. I do watch the Great British Baking Show; Peter won.) and walked from social media.
I cook (made paneer, beer, ghee and vanilla this week), started talking to my husband (who was doing the same thing). I picked up sefarim and started learning. I started learning about instead of just reciting Tehillim. I daven regularly and pay attention to what I am reciting. I started becoming the Jew HaShem wanted me to be.
It made a complete change in my life. Thanks to Mark, Bill and Mr. Dorsey, I am now a real human instead of an experiment for big-tech and much better for it.
(5) Nancy, January 21, 2021 11:52 AM
Our weekly privilege
As Jews we of course are privileged to be able to disconnect from social media once a week for 25 hours. IMO this is a privilege that we should not overlook. Btw--It is great to see you here Judy!
(4) Anonymous, January 18, 2021 1:51 AM
Thank you. It’s difficult to manage kids access after they are 14 or 15.
As kids get older and tech smart, it becomes impossible to manage or control their use of social media. Start early with no access to TV until maybe 9 or 10.
(3) Rachel, January 17, 2021 5:10 PM
Where are Orthodox leaders?
While I am Modern Orthodox and have television, many of my friends do not because they believe the negative influence outweighs the positive content. Yet my husband and I are among a minority who do not use social media, which I believe is a much more problematic medium because there is so little oversight. I wish Orthodox leaders would speak out against use of these platforms. I do not include email, which is similar to postal mail or fax.
Yael, January 18, 2021 2:33 AM
They're there.
Although rabbis and mentors aren't very vocal, if you seek guidance you will find it. I've never heard a Rav promote social media.
There's this incredible organization called TAG (Technology Awareness Group), created for Orthodox technology users. This organization educates about social media, among other things, and guides people to devices and filters that work for what they need and won't damage them spiritually.
Dassie, January 19, 2021 10:43 PM
A bit surprised to hear these comments.
For years, Orthodox rabbis & rebbetzins have been speaking against social media.
Just as one example: The main reason I never went on Facebook (or any other social media) is because of Rabbi Zechariah Wallerstein's lectures speaking against Facebook.
Maybe it depends on which community you're in?
Great recommendation of TAG, Yael. And kudos to Rachel & husband for doing the right thing with regard to social media. There is a lot of social pressure to be on social media. It's not always easy to swim against the current.
And Judy Gruen: This was a very well-written, pertinent, and compelling article—as usual. Yashar koach!
(2) H.E.Brown, January 17, 2021 12:09 PM
Social media and dilemma.
RIGHT ON. Amazing thing it's. Showing my age. I remember when Radio was king. Then TV which changed everything including home life. Before TV people would sit as family around the radio and at the kitchen table together. TV ruined that type of get together. So now we have are cell phones and laptops that have made it worse. I'm as guilty as the next guy with this high tech stuff. What is the answer. I don't know. Try to discipline ourselves and use it wisely. Much of all this stuff is wireless. NOTE: God has always been wireless so pray to Him to help us use it wisely.
Nancy, January 21, 2021 10:30 PM
To H.E. Brown
I am probably also showing my age, but I remember when my parents only had one TV in the house. I had a radio in my bedroom and enjoyed listening to top 40 songs by the hour. :-) I now own more than one TV but my living room, kitchen and dining room are TV free zones. However, I still listen to the radio. I keep a large radio in the kitchen and listen to classical music while I am cooking.
(1) Alan S., January 17, 2021 12:09 PM
Excellent article by Ms. Gruen.
Facebook, Google, and Instagram are merely tools. Ms. Gruen makes an excellent point in that it can be used for good as well as bad. Facebook and Instagram can exert some control of your mind if you allow it. Just like books were thought to be a form of 'mind control' - and burned -- 'everything in moderation' is the best way to prevent becoming addicted to these big online sites. Many times I've commented on Aish.com and on other sites, that Facebook and Instagram give certain people a form of 'self-validation'.