If you scan the headlines, you may have seen that I've written a new book, "Ally: My Journey Across the American-Israeli Divide." Clearly, it has touched a nerve.
This is hardly surprising. The book is out precisely when the United States looks poised to sign a nuclear deal with Iran – a deal that is bad for Israel, bad for America and bad for the world.
For Israel, Iran's nuclear program poses not one, but several existential threats. The first and most obvious is that Iran will develop nuclear warheads and will place them atop one of the many intercontinental ballistic missiles it has built, missiles whose sole purpose is to carry such warheads. Israel, according to the "moderate" former Iranian leader Akbar Hashemi Rafsanjani, is "a one-bomb country."
The second threat derives from the fact that Iran is the world's largest state sponsor of terror, backing attacks against Israeli civilians and Jews across five continents and in dozens of cities. If Iran acquires nuclear capabilities, so too will the terrorists, who will not need an ICBM to deliver their weapon, but only a ship container.
Lastly, but no less nightmarishly, once Iran acquires nuclear capabilities, so too will many of the countries in the Middle East, transforming an already unstable region into a nuclear powder keg.
For Israelis, the Iranian nuclear issue is not about legacy, but our children's lives. However, the Iranian nuclear program threatens not only Israel and the Middle East, but also America and the world.
Iranian proxies are second only to al Qaeda in the number of Americans they have killed in recent years. This is the same regime that took over the U.S. Embassy and took its staff hostage in 1979, that was responsible for the attacks on the U.S. Embassy and Marine barracks in Beirut in 1983 and the Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia in 1996. In 2011, as the U.S. attorney general noted, it even endorsed a plot to blow up a crowded popular restaurant in Washington.
In the short run, perhaps, America can at least gamble on whether the Iranian regime is rational and a potentially responsible regional actor. But what if Israel's estimation is correct – that the Iranian regime is irrational and will devote tens of billions of dollars in sanctions relief not to peaceful development, but to enhancing its global terrorist networks?
Well-intentioned advocates of the proposed Iranian nuclear deal, the deadline for which has been pushed back to July 7, will argue that it provides for intrusive inspections of Iranian nuclear facilities, will remove a large portion of Iran's stockpile of enriched uranium, and, for a 10-year period, will prevent Iran from producing a nuclear weapon in less than 12 months. Yet other experts – including leading American scientists – have concluded that, under this agreement Iran could break out military nuclear power in a far shorter period and could develop the wherewithal to create not just one bomb, but an atomic arsenal.
In the interim, the agreement will also bestow legitimacy on an Iran that is attempting to overthrow pro-American governments throughout the Middle East, such as Saudi Arabia and Yemen, and is propping up the Syrian dictator who has killed many tens of thousands of his own citizens. The regime seeks to extend its hegemony throughout the region and beyond.
Distance can be emotionally deceiving. The nuclear deal imperils the United States as much as Israel, just not as immediately. The Supreme Leader directs crowds in chanting "Death to America." The Iranian navy practices blowing up U.S. aircraft carriers, and its armed forces bear responsibility for the deaths of hundreds of American soldiers who fought bravely in Iraq.
There has been a suggestion from those conducting the negotiations with Iran that the alternative to a deal is war. It's not true. The alternative is a better deal brought about by ratcheted-up sanctions, a deal that dismantles Iranian nuclear facilities and is linked to a fundamental change in Iran's behavior: It must cease trying to overthrow pro-American governments, it must cease sponsoring terror worldwide, and it must stop threatening to destroy America's cherished ally, Israel.
This op-ed originally appeared on cnn.com
(4) Anonymous, July 21, 2015 4:03 PM
Iran is ruled by insane religious zealots who love death not lifel
The ayatollahs have stated time and again that they love death as much as (most normal people!) love life. If they wish to die they can do so whenever they like, suicide included. The aspire to dying for whatever reason is a simptome of insanity. No animal (and we humans are also animals) strive to stay alive as long as possible. To desire death is madness.
(3) Anonymous, July 5, 2015 11:24 PM
A blessing for a blessing
According to Genesis 12:3 the nations that are a blessing to Israel will themselves receive a blessing and the nations who curse Israel will themselves be cursed.
Could that be why the nations that did not stand up for Israel during the war are now in financial difficulties?
(2) Eugene levich, July 5, 2015 10:00 PM
Obama sincerely believe in muslim supremacy
Sherlock Holmes once explained to Dr. Watson; "Watson he said; when you investigate a crime and all versions are ruled out except one thiat explains everything is the truth, however improbable this may seem". History will see this truth with amazement and disbelief. How indeed could it happen on the 4th of July?
(1) Anonymous, July 5, 2015 7:02 PM
hogwash
Firstly, Iran is no worse than any other player in this game of insanity. The USA some can argue is the worlds largest terrorist on all fronts Who one sides with is all about one's own self interest.
If people like you and all the right wing red necks here in the USA cares so much about the world, why dont all of you give your nuclear weapons in order to encourage others to forego development of such destructive devices. I do not hear any of you offering to get rid of your stock pile. why ? Because you want to maintain the power to destroy others while you seek to deny them the ability to defend themselves. There is a word for that, its called hypocrisy.. The change you wish to see in the world has to start with you. Until you are advocating positive change with yourself, I say go diddle yourself.
Ben (of Ben's Tallit Shop), July 6, 2015 1:29 PM
Iran wants to defend itself?
The US seeks to deny other countries the ability to defend themselves? You could say that about the Obama administration in regards to Israel, but I don't think that's what you have in mind.
Against whom does Iran seek to defend itself? Iran is the world's leading aggressor state and in the Middle East the only rival it has in its belligerence is Isis.
It might be a good idea for you to take a look at the record: Except in the case of kamikaze Japan, the US has never used nuclear weapons, and obviously has no intention of using them offensively. The same applies to Israel.
LarryB, July 18, 2015 11:23 AM
Speaking of Hogwash.
There is real fear of a new nuclear arms race in the middle east because of this agreement the president wants. Our congress must not sign this agreement.
Lea, July 21, 2015 1:36 AM
Reponse to Anonymous
You do not give up your ability to defend yourself, with the hope the other will do the same. That is called suicide. Iran is shouting Death to America and Death to Israel all the while lying through their teeth. G-d will not allow anyone to destroy Israel, and anyone who tries will have consequences. Just look at history to see how many nations have tried to eliminate the Jewish people, and see what happened to them? The list is very long, but the Jewish people live. It will be interesting to see how this plays out. Am Yisrael Chair!