I received a text from my daughter recently – all in caps and full of excited exclamation marks, too numerous to count. If I didn’t know better, I would think she had just gotten engaged or had her first child. But no, this joy was in response to getting out of jury duty. I was happy she was happy but a little chagrined by her lack of desire to do her civic duty and a little surprised by the amount of emotion attached to it.
Then, a few weeks later, I met a friend for coffee. My friend is a very successful lawyer whose love of her work I have always respected and admired. She picked me up with a big smile on her face. Eagerly anticipating good news, I got into the car. “I just got out of jury duty” she said. “I didn’t even come close to being impaneled.”
Now, if I am honest with myself, I will acknowledge that, sense of responsibility and gratitude to this country aside, I am also glad to be relieved of jury duty. I also dread the prospect of being trapped for days on end in some nightmare case not of my own choosing and unable to do the work I love. I don’t welcome that notice in the mail and try to delay for a time when I’m guessing it will be short. I’ve even developed my own theory about how wonderful it would be to fill the jury boxes with the “wise and retired” who have the time and experience to bring to this project…
But, despite my reservations, I don’t think I bring the level of joy that my daughter or friend did to being excused from jury duty. And it makes me think. If we are capable of such joy for such a relatively trivial matter, how much more are we capable of for the things that really count? Do we bring that level of joy to those endeavors?
A friend recently told me that she imagines I wake up singing that song from “Oklahoma”, “Oh, what a beautiful morning.” She has an overactive imagination. It’s more likely I wake up tired and cranky and overwhelmed by the day ahead. I mumble Modeh Ani and slowly rise to begin the day’s efforts. But if I looked at the day as if I had jury duty and then been released, perhaps I could bring more excitement to it. If I really focused on the time and opportunity in front of me, I would jump out of bed with greater energy and enthusiasm.
And what about the opportunity to do mitzvot, to help others and connect to the Creator? Am I joyful about those efforts? Do I eagerly welcome them? Or do I, like most American citizens, grudgingly go off to do my duty? The truth is – it depends – on my energy and focus and mood. But it shouldn’t. Because the opportunity is the same.
I was appalled by my daughter’s reaction to the release from jury duty and surprised by my friend’s. But they’ve both reminded me of something invaluable. Just as a blind man who recovers his sight is most appreciative of his eyes, someone who thought their day was going to be spent in unpleasant activities and finds herself freed from that restriction appreciates the day so much more and is more likely to use it to its fullest.
I’m not looking for my jury notices in the mail, nor do I relish my next trudge down to the courtroom – but I wouldn’t mind being released from jury duty just one more time so I can focus on the appreciation and the opportunity of the day in front of me.
(7) howard Sanshuck, January 4, 2016 4:51 AM
The Good and the Bad of Jury Duty
I've never served on a jury because I had a job with a police department during a time when it was standard practice to be exempt. It was lucky for me that that was the case. I would not have voted someone guilty if the evidence did not meet the standard to justify a conviction in accordance with the judges instructions. If I were on a criminal case and did that and it got back to my employer as the district attorney would have seen that they knew, it would have a problem at work. Later after I retired, I got a few summons for jury duty and I tried to get on a panel. In all cases one of the attorneys rejected me. Now because of my age, I don't get called anymore.
(6) Marvin Fellner, January 2, 2016 6:35 PM
I totally disagree with the sentiments
I disagree with Emuna Braverman. I have served on juries several times, and I have been called for panels many more times. I am old enough to opt out, but I consider it my civic duty to the legal system to be available. I also consider it a mitzvah to serve. If everyone were able to avoid duty, or to do it grudgingly, those who are being represented in court, on either side, will not be able to get a fair hearing by their peers. I have helped find people both guilty and innocent of charges, and I cringe at those who think that it is their obligation to avoid jury duty.
(5) Miryam, January 2, 2016 12:44 AM
It's not trivial
It isn't trivial to be called to voir dire; it is terrifying. I may be desensitized to many things, but to receive a threatening letter insisting that no excuse is good enough (as if I should need one in a free country) to freely reject having my privacy invaded and my security threatened is not one of them. I don't feel I owe anything positive to criminals who would violate me, whether common criminal or judicial criminals.
Rachel, January 3, 2016 3:28 PM
Clearly you weren't paying attention in civics
This is a free country because people can get a free trial by an impartial jury of their peers. Crime rates are relatively lower in dictatorships because their is no check on state power to lock up anyone. You owe your time and judgment to the system. And you also owe it in lawsuits, in which neither side is accused of a crime but someone was damaged by the defendants actions.
Marvin Fellner, January 3, 2016 3:42 PM
A violation of privacy??
A juror may be asked to determine that an accused criminal is guilty and should be incarcerated, or that an innocent person should go free. And what about civil cases where someone has been financially wronged? We are obligated by Jewish law to help our neighbors and the stranger among us to be fairly compensated for the wrong. Another article in this issue says that we are all family. As such, we have a duty to hello everyone. Yes, jury duty may disrupt our lives temporarily, but by moral, civil, and religious laws and obligations, we are not allowed to avoid it.
(4) Victoria, January 1, 2016 10:41 PM
Neat.
(3) Anna, January 1, 2016 7:46 AM
SusanE: It is hardly avoiding jury duty if one is not chosen from the people who are called,.What should they do-force their way in and demand to be on the jury ? A friend was rejected when he was called to be on a jury-the reason was that he was acquainted, albeit slightly with the victim of what looked like a murder (it's a longgggg story) so there was nothing personal in it-one of the detectives ? lawyers ? knew that J lived in the same street as the dead man. He was very glad later as the case went on and on and on.
Most people don't choose not to do it, they just aren't chosen for some reason. Why shouldn't they be glad about that ?
(2) SusanE, December 31, 2015 2:28 AM
Love Jury Duty
Been called 7 times and picked 5 times. Everyone deserves a jury of their peers. Everyone. How can anyone claim to be a good citizen if they try to avoid jury duty. That is even worse than not voting. - - What could possible be more important that day?
(1) Nancy, December 28, 2015 12:50 PM
I'm always glad to do mitzvot.
At the risk of sounding showy, this statement is true. Doing mitzvot is a win/win concept for more than one person. Without going into details, I did one yesterday. I was very happy to help the recipient, and this person was very appreciative of my efforts. It is also healthy to do mitzvot. (No, I have no actual proof to back up that last statement.)