The great advocate of non-violent resistance, Mahatma Gandhi, never threw rocks.
Martin Luther King Jr. never threw rocks.
But according to the New York Times, Palestinians who throw rocks are following the “path of unarmed resistance.”
For its March 17 cover story (“Is This Where the Third Intifada Will Start?”), the Times’ Sunday magazine profiled the Palestinian village of Nabi Saleh. But not until over 1,000 words into the story does reporter Ben Ehrenreich mention that the “unarmed” resisters routinely throw stones at Israelis. One of the Palestinians quoted explains that “I want to help my country and my village… I can just throw stones.” Another says, “We see stones as our message.”
When it comes to whitewashing Palestinian violence, this is just the tip of the iceberg.
In the West Bank town of Bilin, where Palestinian rioters regularly hurl rocks, Molotov cocktails and burning tires, 170 Israeli soldiers were injured during one 18-month period. So how did the Christian Science Monitor describe this violence? “Peaceful Palestinian Resistance is Paying Off” (February 11, 2010). The Los Angeles Times – under the front-page headline, “Palestinians Who See Nonviolence as Their Weapon” – described how Palestinian weapons consist of innocuous “bullhorn, banners, and a fierce belief” in “peaceful protest” (November 4, 2009). Incredibly, the Times suggests that 170 Israelis were injured after being overwhelmed by bullhorns and banners.
This same media mentality can spin even the most violent Palestinian groups as passive and calm. The Globe and Mail, Canada’s newspaper of record, bought into the false notion that Hamas – best known for perfecting the art of bus bombings, rocket fire and restaurant explosions – has evolved into “ethical,” “truthful,” "pragmatic” peaceniks who advocate “non-violent resistance.” (Patrick Martin, July 7, 2009; Orly Halpern, February 26, 2008)
As shards of glass hit the driver’s eyes, the bus veered off the road.
If anyone had any doubt about whether rock-throwing was perhaps “peaceful,” the events of March 14, 2013 have proved otherwise. Rock-throwing Palestinians hit an Israeli bus, sending shards of glass into the driver’s eyes and causing the bus to go off the road.
As a truck swerved to avoid the bus, a car crashed and became trapped under the truck, resulting in serious injuries to a mother and her three children. One of them, 2-year-old daughter, Adele, is in life-threatening condition.
On a single evening last week, seven people were injured in 10 different rock-throwing attacks. One 10-month-old baby was severely injured by glass fragments to the face.
Over the years, dozens of Israeli civilians have been murdered and maimed by this "innocent act of "resistance" that should be more accurately defined as “low-tech terror.”
Tragically, the more the media presents Palestinian violence as peaceful, the more Israel is stripped of its license to fight against them – endangering the very foundation of Israel’s security.
This leaves just one question: Why does the media insist on covering all this up?
(7) Rachel, March 28, 2013 5:18 PM
Cruelty
Anyone who would throw rocks at a baby is a cruel and heartless person who should be thrown out of holy land. The Arabs supporters should be thrown out as well. They have no compassion for the baby and blamed the mother who almost died as well.
(6) moshebenlevi, March 24, 2013 12:54 PM
let throw rocks back
What the New York Times will say if we start throwing rocks back? Definetely we will use hitech rock throwers, like the potato gun... but it will be within the media acceptable rock standards.
(5) Ari, March 23, 2013 6:18 PM
Media Bias!
If we were the rock throwers, then rocks would be dangerous but because they are, rocks are just rocks and we are still the bad guys.
It is just really sad.
Lynette, April 29, 2013 11:21 AM
Rock Throwing
Dear Ari, People with half a brain can see the tide of antisemitism rising. The news is so biased towards the arabs no matter what they do. Don't you worry, have courage and know there are those that love and support Israel who are not Jews. You are in my prayers for peace and safety for God 's precious chosen people.
(4) Adam, March 22, 2013 6:15 PM
"This leaves just one question: Why does the media insist on covering all this up?"
The good Rabbi asks naively, "This leaves just one question: Why does the media insist on covering all this up?"
I can answer this question. Because in this conflict they chose the side of the Arabs.
Period. Myself, I am totally puzzled how anyone cannot understand this.
(3) Mary Zimmerman, March 21, 2013 7:03 PM
Rocks not harmful? What did David kill Goliath with? Some of us in the States can read between the lines. Rest assured, everything belongs to God, even that mosque on temple mt. One well placed earthquake will take it down, but when it happens brace yourself cause its gonna be your fault! They will blame you if the sun shines or doesn't, so who cares what they think. I sure don't. I have read the Bible cover to cover, I know how it ends. Shalom!
(2) Anonymous, March 21, 2013 6:57 PM
NON-VIOLENT RESISTANCE????
"This same media mentality can spin even the most violent Palestinian groups as passive and calm. The Globe and Mail, Canada’s newspaper of record, bought into the false notion that Hamas – best known for perfecting the art of bus bombings, rocket fire and restaurant explosions – has evolved into “ethical,” “truthful,” "pragmatic” peaceniks who advocate “non-violent resistance.” (Patrick Martin, July 7, 2009; Orly Halpern, February 26, 2008)"
This is what certain media term "non-violent resistance" - "unarmed resistance."
Stones hurled at the windscreen of a bus that caused the bus to overturn resulting in severe injuries (one 2 year old girl is in a life - threatening condition) to the innocent passengers is in no way "unarmed resistance!"
Stones are weapons when put in the wrong hands - so "unarmed" is not the true situation.
The media, as usual, have cashed in on terrible happenings - without telling the true facts. They should be taken to court and given the severest sentences available for misrepresentation.
(1) Anonymous, March 21, 2013 2:57 PM
because they hate the message
As long as Israel exists, as long as Jews exist, the Message is Clear that the God of Israel exists.
And, if the God of Israel exists, all other gods are fake gods, and the Torah is correct.
All who hate this Message, hate the jews, and will use any possible means to get rid of the Message and the messenger.